yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org

Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] layer.conf: Update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for mickledore

LOL :). Depends whose CI was noticed first.

By Khem Raj · #58919 ·

Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] layer.conf: Update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for mickledore

It's nice knowing someone other than me is using this layer :-)

By Trevor Woerner · #58918 ·

Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] layer.conf: Update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for mickledore

Trevor already won this race (I was second, you're third) :) https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/yocto/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=mickledore&archive=&delegate=

By Martin Jansa · #58917 ·

[meta-rockchip][PATCH] layer.conf: Update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for mickledore

oe-core switched to mickedore [1] [1] https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=57239d66b933c4313cf331d35d13ec2d0661c38f Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...> ---

By Khem Raj · #58916 ·

[meta-security][PATCH] layer.conf: Mark master as compatible with mickledore

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- meta-integrity/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- meta-parsec/conf/layer.conf | 2

By Armin Kuster · #58915 ·

Re: bitbake controlling memory use

By all means please do. Everyone will benefit from teaching make to abstain from starting new processes if RAM is tight, even people with xeon/epyc grade hardware. It's not that I don't want to spend

By Alexander Kanavin · #58914 ·

[meta-security][PATCH] layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for mickledore

* oe-core switched to mickedore in: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=57239d66b933c4313cf331d35d13ec2d0661c38f Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@...> ---

By Martin Jansa · #58913 ·

[meta-rockchip][PATCH] layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for mickledore

* oe-core switched to mickedore in: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=57239d66b933c4313cf331d35d13ec2d0661c38f Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@...> ---

By Martin Jansa · #58912 ·

[meta-rockchip][PATCH] layer.conf: update LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for mickledore

Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index

By Trevor Woerner · #58911 ·

Re: Remove kernel image and modules from rootfs

Hi Konstantin, So, you needed the extra :beaglebone-yocto because the machine configuration file is parsed after local.conf, therefore since beaglebone-yocto.conf file has: MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS

By Quentin Schulz · #58910 ·

Re: bitbake controlling memory use

Hi Alex, Op 03-01-2023 om 16:37 schreef Alexander Kanavin: You are completely right for professional use cases. Another way would be to give ssh access to a sufficiently large build server. But the

By Ferry Toth · #58909 ·

Re: Remove kernel image and modules from rootfs

Thank you :-) Dear Quentin, this is correct. It worked this way. I admit, I was not aware the config snippets I copied need to be modified for the local.conf in a way the machine name has to

By Konstantin Kletschke · #58908 ·

Yocto Project Status 3 January 2023 (WW01)

Current Dev Position: YP 4.2 M2 Next Deadline: 23rd January 2023 YP 4.2 M2 Build Next Team Meetings: Bug Triage meeting Thursday January 5th 7:30 am PDT

By Stephen Jolley · #58907 ·

Re: bitbake controlling memory use

Hi Ferry, don't get discouraged from working on jobserver related issues by some remarks. Yes your HW configuration is a bit extreme, but similar issues are easily reproducible on beefier HW as well

By Martin Jansa · #58906 ·

Re: bitbake controlling memory use

On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 16:24, Alexander Kanavin via lists.yoctoproject.org <alex.kanavin=gmail.com@...> wrote: I mean, one can use a virtual machine inside a windows laptop if that's

By Alexander Kanavin · #58905 ·

Re: bitbake controlling memory use

Sorry guys, but this is venturing into the ridiculous. If you embark on building a whole Linux distribution, you need to start with the correct tools for it. Alex

By Alexander Kanavin · #58904 ·

Re: bitbake controlling memory use

Hi Janne, Op 03-01-2023 om 16:03 schreef Janne Kiiskila: Sure, that is easy enough. Setting PARALLEL_MAKE is easy enough too. I was hoping to find a fundamental solution. Yeah, building rust is a

By Ferry Toth · #58903 ·

Re: bitbake controlling memory use

Hei, Is not the easiest solution to build the actual full build in steps, rather than build the whole thing? So, instead of doing a full bitbake <image> Do bitbake nodejs bitbake

By Janne Kiiskila · #58902 ·

Re: lsusb

Hi Ron, The package.manifest only contains packages so it's normal that lsusb does not appear there since there's no package *named* lsusb. E.g. there's no lsusb package in Debian, but you can

By Quentin Schulz · #58901 ·

Re: bitbake controlling memory use

Hi Quentin, Op 03-01-2023 om 15:36 schreef Quentin Schulz: Exactly

By Ferry Toth · #58900 ·

Messages