yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org

Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 3.2

All, Below is the list as of top 50 bug owners as of the end of WW21 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.2. There are 110 possible work days left until the final

By Stephen Jolley · #49480 ·

Re: how to un-blacklist a blacklisted recipe?

done, and submitted. it was just my horrific luck that i was testing that feature, and randomly grabbed two recipes that used standard assignment. le *sigh* ... rday

By Robert P. J. Day · #49479 ·

Re: how to un-blacklist a blacklisted recipe?

Yes, it's worth. Thanks

By Martin Jansa · #49478 ·

Re: how to un-blacklist a blacklisted recipe?

never mind, just took a look at the commit which does exactly this. is it worth submitting a patch to tweak the few hard assignments? rday

By Robert P. J. Day · #49477 ·

Re: how to un-blacklist a blacklisted recipe?

i just now determined that that is exactly what is happening -- tried it with nanopb recipe from meta-oe, which contains: PNBLACKLIST[nanopb] = "Needs forward porting to use python3" switched

By Robert P. J. Day · #49476 ·

Re: how to un-blacklist a blacklisted recipe?

Yes, in local.conf or distro config, both work fine. Maybe your PNBLACKLIST you're trying to unblacklist is using normal assignment instead of weak one?

By Martin Jansa · #49475 ·

Re: how to un-blacklist a blacklisted recipe?

*where* did you set it to empty? in your local.conf?

By Robert P. J. Day · #49474 ·

Re: how to un-blacklist a blacklisted recipe?

i tested it ... at least i *thought* i tested it on a blacklisted recipe. i'll try it again, i guess i just misspelled something. rday

By Robert P. J. Day · #49473 ·

Re: how to un-blacklist a blacklisted recipe?

I don't use WR, but setting it to empty works fine for me. Why do you think it shouldn't work? See https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass#n18

By Martin Jansa · #49472 ·

how to un-blacklist a blacklisted recipe?

asking what is almost certainly a silly question, but as i'm poring over the wind river LTS 19 (aka "zeus") developer's guide, i know that WR adds a feature for un-blacklisting blacklisted recipes via

By Robert P. J. Day · #49471 ·

Re: overwrite LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ for different layer

FWIW, you could make the parsing order not matter (at least in thud, from a quick look, master as well). LAYERSERIES_COMPAT is resolved after all layer.conf have been parsed[1]. I do not know if it's

By Quentin Schulz · #49470 ·

gpg: can't connect to the agent: File name too long

Hi, I'm using this command from a new image type ''' gpg --homedir home --encrypt --sign --default-key "server@..." --pinentry-mode loopback --passphrase-file server.passphrase --recipient

By Damien LEFEVRE · #49469 ·

Please unsubscribe me from the mailing list.

By Jean François DAROCHA · #49468 ·

Re: overwrite LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ for different layer

You can add a layer which will set LAYERSERIES_COMPAT for another layer, but it needs to be parsed before the layer you want to change,

By Martin Jansa · #49467 ·

overwrite LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ for different layer

Hi, have an issue with a layer which doesn't have the current dunfell release in it's LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ -> can I overwrite it somehow in a different layer or local.conf? -> can I configure the error

By TRO <thomas.roos@...> · #49466 ·

Re: can i run an arbitrary x86_64-based image under QEMU?

i suspected it was a WR thing, thanks. rday

By Robert P. J. Day · #49465 ·

Re: [ptest-runner] Added output processing to pytest

Is it possible to continue to add ptest for python-XX in the old way at present, and wait for the new recipe to be integrated (uncertain time), and then uniformly process the output? Or suspend the

By zangrc · #49464 ·

Re: [ptest-runner] Added output processing to pytest

I like the idea of format the output at level of pytest, in OEQA there is OETestResult class that is where the changes need to be made to add the option to use AM

By Anibal Limon · #49463 ·

Re: can i run an arbitrary x86_64-based image under QEMU?

To me this seems like Wind River's special sauce. The CHANGELOG in meta-intel says this: Added QEMU support. ------------------- We now build several virtio drivers into the kernel by default,

By Alexander Kanavin · #49462 ·

can i run an arbitrary x86_64-based image under QEMU?

currently poring over wind river docs and in release notes for WR LTS 19 (equivalent to YP 3.0), one of the notes for RCPL 7 for this release of WR states: "New support to deploy a platform project

By Robert P. J. Day · #49461 ·

Messages