Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- {recipes-security => recipes-scanners}/checksec/checksec_2.1.0.bb | 0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename {recipes-security

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- {recipes-security => recipes-scanners}/clamav/clamav_0.101.5.bb | 0 .../clamav/files/clamav-freshclam.service | 0

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-scanners/rootkits/chkrootkit_0.53.bb | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-security/fail2ban/python3-fail2ban_0.10.4.0.bb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

add findutils Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- meta-security-compliance/recipes-auditors/lynis/lynis_2.7.5.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Also as Quentin suggested it might be needed to remove the "-mt" suffix, but I see it in the do_install() method of the "boost" recipe for revision 1.64. Kind regards, Laurent. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020

Hi again Emily, You have put your finger on the core issue there. The name of the boost python library which is linked in your "opc-ua-server-gfex" recipe is "boost_python-mt" where it seems that it

Hi Emily, I should have read more carefully, sorry. So... After googling a little bit I stumbled upon: https://askubuntu.com/a/486184 "The -mt suffix had been removed. The installed Boost libraries

It was pointed out to me that there is no Maintainer selection process or criteria defined. This will have to be sorted out before we move forward on this transition. - armin

I'm trying to build am image that supports X11 and will use the official 7" touch screen from the Raspberry Pi organization for the raspberrypi2. To test I've built both core-image-x11 and core-image

That fragment is part of the BSP definition, and has been defined as "hardware dependent", which is why you get the warning when you disable it. What you are doing, is the right way to do things,

What is the best way of excluding a kernel configuration fragment? I am trying to disable sound support in the kernel. I can create a fragment for this but then this conflicts with the other existing

Hi Laurent - Thanks for the suggestion. It looks like there are a few packages that provide libboost_python3: find tmp/work/*/*/*/packages-split -name

Hi Emily, To find the solution to your issue in a rational and deterministic way we need to start from the error message. What I understand is that while build recipe "opc-ua-server-gfex" you get an

Hi Quentin - That's what I tried originally! DEPENDS on boost and not boost-python gives me the following error when trying to build my original recipe:

Hi Emily, Ok so two things. Yes, I'd say you need python in PACKAGECONFIG for boost. However, it seems it's already part of the default value of PACKAGECONFIG,

Hi all - I'm trying to build an opca recipe (https://github.com/kratsg/meta-l1calo/blob/add/opcServer/recipes-core/opc-ua/opc-ua-server-gfex_git.bb) and it's giving me a build error like: |

Current Dev Position: YP 3.1 M4 - Stabilization Next Deadline: YP 3.1 M4 build date 3/30/2020 Next Team Meetings: Bug Triage meeting Thursday Mar. 19th at 7:30am PDT

Hi! I am building a solution on top of raspberrypi 3a+. I am having problem that around 50% of available memory never gets used by the node applications and instead the kswapd kicks in and after a

Hello Khem Raj, Sorry for the late reply. I was not available during last week. So, I post here my recipe. But before I want to make two comments: I found a variable in the cmake\*.bbclass (i.e.