|
Re: Why python3 is build native in yocto ???
#python
The python3 build for target doesn't directly depend on python3-native.
Some recipes do depend on python3-native (although by definition there
is a python3 on your host) as they need to run
The python3 build for target doesn't directly depend on python3-native.
Some recipes do depend on python3-native (although by definition there
is a python3 on your host) as they need to run
|
By
Ross Burton <ross@...>
·
#51288
·
|
|
Re: Why python3 is build native in yocto ???
#python
Howdy!
Am Fr., 6. Nov. 2020 um 09:23 Uhr schrieb <william.jacob@...>:
I'm sorry, but I don't really understand the question. You say you
want python3 crosscompiled. This will happen if
Howdy!
Am Fr., 6. Nov. 2020 um 09:23 Uhr schrieb <william.jacob@...>:
I'm sorry, but I don't really understand the question. You say you
want python3 crosscompiled. This will happen if
|
By
Josef Holzmayr
·
#51287
·
|
|
Why python3 is build native in yocto ???
#python
Hi,
I am trying to compile python package for yocto and I found python3 (python3.7) is build native then it cross compiled.I want to know why it is done like this in python.
Basically I want
Hi,
I am trying to compile python package for yocto and I found python3 (python3.7) is build native then it cross compiled.I want to know why it is done like this in python.
Basically I want
|
By
William Jacob
·
#51286
·
|
|
Re: : how to fix "do not ask to insatll a package providing xxxx"?
It's basically about some package conflict & absence.
You could provide more info such as you bb file, the layers you're using, the result of `grep
It's basically about some package conflict & absence.
You could provide more info such as you bb file, the layers you're using, the result of `grep
|
By
Chen Qi
·
#51285
·
|
|
What part of do_package automatically scoops up source files?
Hi all,
I’m hoping that someone can just answer this off the top of their head – don’t bother if you have to dig much.
We’ve got a C recipe (built with cmake, if that’s relevant) that
Hi all,
I’m hoping that someone can just answer this off the top of their head – don’t bother if you have to dig much.
We’ve got a C recipe (built with cmake, if that’s relevant) that
|
By
Sean McKay
·
#51284
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH ] zephyr: Yocto Image Tests Fix
From: yockgenm <yock.gen.mah@...>
Fix bug on Image Test, previously the Image Tests was not working due to update on Yocto Image Test Framework.
The fix has rewritten and restructured existing
From: yockgenm <yock.gen.mah@...>
Fix bug on Image Test, previously the Image Tests was not working due to update on Yocto Image Test Framework.
The fix has rewritten and restructured existing
|
By
yock.gen.mah@...
·
#51283
·
|
|
Re: Reproducible builds and RPM packages
Just to be clear, I’m referring to the RPM metadata. If you build a package, and then run "rpm -q --qf '[%{FILENAMES} %{FILEMTIMES}\n]' -p package” on the output, the listed timestamps will not
Just to be clear, I’m referring to the RPM metadata. If you build a package, and then run "rpm -q --qf '[%{FILENAMES} %{FILEMTIMES}\n]' -p package” on the output, the listed timestamps will not
|
By
Anders Montonen
·
#51282
·
|
|
Re: #yocto overriding a task in a recipe
#yocto
Thanks... that's what I saw this morning...
Thanks... that's what I saw this morning...
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#51281
·
|
|
Re: #yocto overriding a task in a recipe
#yocto
it depends, if the task is having appends etc. they will still be applied. but main task you can override.
it depends, if the task is having appends etc. they will still be applied. but main task you can override.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#51280
·
|
|
# yocto zeus -building a grub image
Can someone provide an answer on how to correct the following grub build issue ?
I am attempting to build a grub image under zeus, and I am seeing the error output below…
It appears that
Can someone provide an answer on how to correct the following grub build issue ?
I am attempting to build a grub image under zeus, and I am seeing the error output below…
It appears that
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#51279
·
|
|
Re: : how to fix "do not ask to insatll a package providing xxxx"?
Hi Byron,
It's a dependency problem. The build system cannot find a recipe to build libdebuglog1. You either need to provide that or you don't install anything that requires
Hi Byron,
It's a dependency problem. The build system cannot find a recipe to build libdebuglog1. You either need to provide that or you don't install anything that requires
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
·
#51278
·
|
|
#yocto overriding a task in a recipe
#yocto
If a recipe has a task “do_something() {…stuff…}”, and for some reason I do not want that task to execute its steps, but a different series of steps, can I over-ride the task from a .bbapend
If a recipe has a task “do_something() {…stuff…}”, and for some reason I do not want that task to execute its steps, but a different series of steps, can I over-ride the task from a .bbapend
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#51277
·
|
|
: how to fix "do not ask to insatll a package providing xxxx"?
Dear all,
I build a libarary in other project. And add a bb file in yocto to add to my yocto project, but it appear error.
who can tell me how to fix it?
thanks,
Byron
Dear all,
I build a libarary in other project. And add a bb file in yocto to add to my yocto project, but it appear error.
who can tell me how to fix it?
thanks,
Byron
|
By
ouyangxuan10@163.com
·
#51276
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] scap-security-guide: fix build with Python 3.9
The getchildren and getiterator functions are deprecated in Python 3.9.
Backport 3 patches to fix the build
The getchildren and getiterator functions are deprecated in Python 3.9.
Backport 3 patches to fix the build
|
By
Yi Zhao
·
#51275
·
|
|
Re: how to use meta-cpan layer in a reproducible way?
right, so usually it means maintainers keep master moving forward and perhaps test with latest release or master or perhaps all releases after the thud branch, you have to ask this question to the
right, so usually it means maintainers keep master moving forward and perhaps test with latest release or master or perhaps all releases after the thud branch, you have to ask this question to the
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#51274
·
|
|
Re: Reproducible builds and RPM packages
On 2020-11-03 6:16 a.m., Anders Montonen wrote:
Hi Anders,
I haven't played with that for a while but I'm pretty sure the answer is yes, it's intentional.
You can
On 2020-11-03 6:16 a.m., Anders Montonen wrote:
Hi Anders,
I haven't played with that for a while but I'm pretty sure the answer is yes, it's intentional.
You can
|
By
Randy MacLeod
·
#51273
·
|
|
Re: Removing postinst script in bbappend
It's a simple operation. They check for the existence of /etc/apparmor.d/cache. If it doesn't exist, then they create it as a directory.
I'm not sure why it can't be moved elsewhere, as we're not the
It's a simple operation. They check for the existence of /etc/apparmor.d/cache. If it doesn't exist, then they create it as a directory.
I'm not sure why it can't be moved elsewhere, as we're not the
|
By
Jim Krantz
·
#51272
·
|
|
Re: Removing postinst script in bbappend
The right way would be to fix the recipe I think? What is doing that has to happen only on target and can't be done during do_rootfs?
Alex
The right way would be to fix the recipe I think? What is doing that has to happen only on target and can't be done during do_rootfs?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#51271
·
|
|
Re: Removing postinst script in bbappend
The recipe is apparmor, layer is meta-security.
We're currently using the 2.x recipe, however the 3.x recipe appears to have the same function.
The recipe is apparmor, layer is meta-security.
We're currently using the 2.x recipe, however the 3.x recipe appears to have the same function.
|
By
Jim Krantz
·
#51270
·
|
|
Re: Removing postinst script in bbappend
What recipe is it and what layer is it in?
Alex
What recipe is it and what layer is it in?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#51269
·
|