What does it mean when a bbappend files does something like the following to a task layer ? do_install() { : } Thanks, Steve

Hello, I am trying to create a recipe for a package that contains a whole systemd-nspawn container (a rootfs that goes into /var/lib/machines/mycontainer) and a system nspawn config file that goes

Hello, I am trying to build a image that work on a raspberry pi 3 and 4. Does anyone know a way of doing this? I have tryied copying over bcm2710-rpi-3-b.dtb kernel7.img (the RPi3 kernel) over to

Yes, there are significant diffferences in gcc, see: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/porting_to.html https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/porting_to.html The recipes in public

and a short example of how it's used inherit rubygems LICENSE = "BSD-2-Clause" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://License.txt;md5=8f085d0bb9ef0d1705dc5fd61aaaffa1" SRC_URI[sha256sum]

Please find attached, it's basically the old ruby class with only support for pure RubyGems (i.e. no cross-compiling) with some influence from the pypi class for grabbing and compiling a

Thankyou for your comments and guidance. Currently i am trying to first move from krogoth version of yocto to rocko version first that will suffice our requirements but i need to understand whether

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Jack Mitchell wrote: ... snip ... > Hi Robert, > > This is something I would be interested in. I have a developed a > much more basic rubygems class privately which I had

Hi, I had installed a library into the build by writing my own recipe, but cmake couldn't find my installed package. Please anyone suggest what I have to add in my recipe? CMake Error at

Using master branch MACHINE=96b_nitrogen bitbake zephyr-helloworld creates a configure error due to a failure for native python to import ruamel. I fixed this temporarily by creating a

Hi Robert, This is something I would be interested in. I have a developed a much more basic rubygems class privately which I had intended to opensource and create a similar later, so it would be nice

since it appears that i will be diving head-first into messing with ruby in some current YP builds, is there any interest in creating a meta-rubygems layer to start collecting recipes based on what

Hi All, This is the full report for yocto-3.3_M2.rc1: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults ======= Summary ======== No high

Thanks, Richard. That's what I thought it is. Essentially, the includes are, as expected, resolved at parse time of the recipes, which makes entirely sense. The include files themselves conditionally

I suspect that at this point in the parse, the mulitlib code hasn't swizzled the bits around so it still looks like the main lib rather than the mutlilib. Including a variable in a require like that

I have been scratching my head over building openjdk-8 with multilib for an aarch64 system. Essentially, I want to use 32-bit OpenJDK on the 64-bit system. Theoretically adding to local.conf require

All, YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW04 are listed below: Priority Bug ID Short Description Changer Owner Was Became Medium+ 13888 Toaster is not starting for

All, The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week! Who Count anuj.mittal@... 2 akuster808@... 1 richard.purdie@... 1 david.reyna@... 1 Grand

All, Below is the list as of top 50 bug owners as of the end of WW04 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.3. There are 67 possible work days left until the final

Current Dev Position: YP 3.3 M3 development Next Deadline: 1st March 2021 YP 3.3 M3 build Next Team Meetings: Bug Triage meeting Thursday Jan. 28th at 7:30am PDT