yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org

[meta-zephyr][PATCH v2 2/4] intel-x86-64.conf: add common MACHINE for x86 (64-bit) BOARDS

User need to specify board value to ZEPHYR_BOARD in local.conf ZEPHYR_BOARD = "ehl_crb" By default it set to Elkhart Lake CRB 'ehl_crb' Currently 64-bit supported boards: * up_squared *

By Naveen Saini · #53602 ·

[meta-zephyr][PATCH v2 1/4] zephyr-kernel-src: fix efi generation failure for x86 boards

With zephyr v2.5.0, EFI binary support has been added for x86 board (64-bit mode). To achieve this, an python tool[1] has been added to convert zephyr ELF file into an EFI appliable. But currently

By Naveen Saini · #53601 ·

[meta-zephyr][PATCH v2 0/4] Fix efi generation and add x86 MACHINE confs (cover letter)

(1) zephyr-kernel-src: fix efi generation failure for x86 boards With zephyr v2.5.0, EFI binary generation support has been added for x86 board (64-bit mode). To achieve this, an python tool[1] has

By Naveen Saini · #53600 ·

Re: hostile freenode takeover

We have registered #oe and #yocto on libera already, so we can easily transition irc servers as the situation develops. Philip

By Philip Balister · #53599 ·

Re: hostile freenode takeover

On 5/20/21 3:32 PM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: First let me say, there is nothing wrong with matrix, have used it every day for years Second the discussion is now about

By Yocto · #53598 ·

Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.3.1.rc1)

Hello All, This is the full report for yocto-3.3.1.rc1: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults ======= Summary ======== No high

By Sangeeta Jain · #53597 ·

Re: hostile freenode takeover

I think the question of setting up Matrix for our community is a valid question, though I think it's orthogonal to the current problem. If freenode goes away , we need an alternate plan to move *right

By Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@...> · #53596 ·

Re: hostile freenode takeover

Hi Khem, all, I disagree. Matrix just does not work. I've been using with a few friends with mixed homeservers, chat.privacytools.io, matrix.org, converser.eu and self-hosted homeservers... I've

By Quentin Schulz · #53595 ·

Re: [meta-zephyr][PATCH] qemuzephyrrunner.py: use existing qemu conf file

Hi Jon,

By Naveen Saini · #53594 ·

[meta-dpdk][PATCH] dpdk: fix build with GCC 11

From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...> Fixes: | In function 'memset', | inlined from 'test_table_stub' at test_table_tables.c:151:4: |

By Yu, Mingli · #53593 ·

Re: [meta-zephyr][PATCH 2/2] zephyr-kernel-src.inc: set default preferred version to 2.6.0-rc1

Hi, Even if we don't have the 2.6.0-rc1 release default (to which I agree), I still think having support for it (as a non default) is beneficial. Especially given that 2.6.0 will be an LTS so people

By Andrei Gherzan · #53592 ·

Re: hostile freenode takeover

<nicolas.dechesne@...> wrote: perhaps good time to consider matrix

By Khem Raj · #53591 ·

Re: hostile freenode takeover

OFTC is very good, IMO. It's been reliable, well managed, provides a good selection of services, provides a web client for anyone not particularly familiar with IRC clients, and supports SSL + CertFP

By Joe MacDonald · #53590 ·

Re: hostile freenode takeover

Thanks for your email. We are aware, and have started to look into that. It looks like some open source communities have started to move to https://www.oftc.net/ or https://libera.chat/.. If anyone

By Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@...> · #53589 ·

hostile freenode takeover

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dear all, there have been recent reports of a hostile takeover of the freenode service, as described

By Jasper Orschulko · #53588 ·

[meta-security][PATCH 3/3] sssd: update to 2.5.0

Add new depends Drop obsolete patches Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- ...AC_CHECK_FILE-when-building-manpages.patch | 34 --------

By Armin Kuster · #53587 ·

[meta-security][PATCH 2/3] ossec-hids: musl not compatable

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-ids/ossec/ossec-hids_3.6.0.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/recipes-ids/ossec/ossec-hids_3.6.0.bb

By Armin Kuster · #53586 ·

[meta-security][PATCH 1/3] packagegroup-core-security: exclude ossec-hids from musl

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git

By Armin Kuster · #53585 ·

[yocto-autobuilder2][dunfell] config.py: enable fedora33 workers for dunfell

Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@...> --- config.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/config.py b/config.py index 520de47..2565bd7 100644 ---

By Steve Sakoman · #53584 ·

Re: PREEMPT_RT patches

Yocto has supported a PREEMPT_RT kernel as long as I can remember. There are recipes for linux-yocto-rt for the kernel itself, and a core-image-rt image recipe right in poky. It's also pretty

By codusnocturnus · #53583 ·

Messages