|
Using U-boot in Yocto
Hello!
I am new to Yocto, and hope that this is the right way to ask for help :-).
I would like to have a way to flash my RPi over USB using `fastboot`, and it seems to me that one way to do that is
Hello!
I am new to Yocto, and hope that this is the right way to ask for help :-).
I would like to have a way to flash my RPi over USB using `fastboot`, and it seems to me that one way to do that is
|
By
Jonas Vautherin
·
#51812
·
|
|
How to add pacemaker and corosync with yocto for aspberrypi with all it's dependencies
#dunfell
#raspberrypi
#yocto
Hello Team,
I need to use High availability cluster in my project. I'm generating OS for Rpi using Ycot. I'm using dunfell poky version 3.1.3.
I'm adding ntp tzdata pacemaker haveged and crmsh command
Hello Team,
I need to use High availability cluster in my project. I'm generating OS for Rpi using Ycot. I'm using dunfell poky version 3.1.3.
I'm adding ntp tzdata pacemaker haveged and crmsh command
|
By
@prashant2314
·
#51811
·
|
|
Re: Is curated SPDX data sharing a thing?
Its going to take someone to stand up and provide the first "version"
of that and I'm not sure anyone wants to step up and be that
person/organisation...
It does depend on which data we're talking
Its going to take someone to stand up and provide the first "version"
of that and I'm not sure anyone wants to step up and be that
person/organisation...
It does depend on which data we're talking
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#51810
·
|
|
Re: Is curated SPDX data sharing a thing?
"Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@...> wrote:
Of course different choices can be made regarding obligations (where
licenses are shown, how sources are distributed) but it in the same
"Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@...> wrote:
Of course different choices can be made regarding obligations (where
licenses are shown, how sources are distributed) but it in the same
|
By
Jérôme Carretero
·
#51809
·
|
|
Re: Is curated SPDX data sharing a thing?
Hi,
The challenge is that Yocto Project lets you build your own custom
software, which means you also end up in your own BoM situation. We
generally therefore provide tooling that can help you
Hi,
The challenge is that Yocto Project lets you build your own custom
software, which means you also end up in your own BoM situation. We
generally therefore provide tooling that can help you
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#51808
·
|
|
Is curated SPDX data sharing a thing?
Hi,
Please correct me if I'm wrong but as far as I understand it, as of
today the flow for generating SPDX data to build software BoMs,
documented eg. in:
-
Hi,
Please correct me if I'm wrong but as far as I understand it, as of
today the flow for generating SPDX data to build software BoMs,
documented eg. in:
-
|
By
Jérôme Carretero
·
#51807
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] glmark2: fix bugs on panfrost
Okay.
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#51806
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] glmark2: fix bugs on panfrost
this patch is generic, perhaps should live with main recipe.
>
this patch is generic, perhaps should live with main recipe.
>
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#51805
·
|
|
Re: Cross compiler which runs on the target architecture
Once the framework is in place adding addtional compile flags like --enable-multilib is relatively easy.. see
Once the framework is in place adding addtional compile flags like --enable-multilib is relatively easy.. see
|
By
Peter
·
#51804
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH] glmark2: fix bugs on panfrost
Alyssa submitted this set of patches for glmark2 to fix/clarify glmark2's
handling of fp16 overflows in a shader (which succeed if the driver doesn't
handle fp16 and uses fp32 instead).
See:
Alyssa submitted this set of patches for glmark2 to fix/clarify glmark2's
handling of fp16 overflows in a shader (which succeed if the driver doesn't
handle fp16 and uses fp32 instead).
See:
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#51803
·
|
|
Re: Cross compiler which runs on the target architecture
Hi Peter,
Am 17.12.20 um 19:59 schrieb Peter:
Thanks for the detail explanation of your solution.
The problem I see is that your solution doesn't scale. What happens if your system have a second not
Hi Peter,
Am 17.12.20 um 19:59 schrieb Peter:
Thanks for the detail explanation of your solution.
The problem I see is that your solution doesn't scale. What happens if your system have a second not
|
By
Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
·
#51802
·
|
|
Re: Cross compiler which runs on the target architecture
The proof of concept layer is http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-exotic/ - https://github.com/peteasa/meta-exotic/wiki. I created a set of cross compilers for the
The proof of concept layer is http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-exotic/ - https://github.com/peteasa/meta-exotic/wiki. I created a set of cross compilers for the
|
By
Peter
·
#51801
·
|
|
how to install/package debug version of library *not* in /usr/lib64/.debug?
just got an interesting request from a colleague ... for reasons i
will explain shortly, it's necessary to build both the normal and
debug versions of a library, but for the debug version to be
just got an interesting request from a colleague ... for reasons i
will explain shortly, it's necessary to build both the normal and
debug versions of a library, but for the debug version to be
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#51800
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Fix Rock Pi 4 serial port
Interesting.
As you know (but for reference for other people) the baud rate of the rock pi
4's serial console is 1,500,000bps and not the usual 115,200bps that
everything else uses.
I have *always*
Interesting.
As you know (but for reference for other people) the baud rate of the rock pi
4's serial console is 1,500,000bps and not the usual 115,200bps that
everything else uses.
I have *always*
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#51799
·
|
|
Re: [[meta-mingw][PATCH] libgcrypt: disable amd64 optimization
Looking at the config.log, I only see the standard Yocto Project (nativesdk)
paths, as well as: --disable-asm --without-capabilities
I'm building on 18.04.4 LTS, I think it's a fairly standard
Looking at the config.log, I only see the standard Yocto Project (nativesdk)
paths, as well as: --disable-asm --without-capabilities
I'm building on 18.04.4 LTS, I think it's a fairly standard
|
By
Mark Hatle
·
#51798
·
|
|
Re: [[meta-mingw][PATCH] libgcrypt: disable amd64 optimization
<mark.hatle@...> wrote:
does it have --enable-optimization switch on ? if so then its probing
the build platform
for features and detects XMM registers and enables them but
<mark.hatle@...> wrote:
does it have --enable-optimization switch on ? if so then its probing
the build platform
for features and detects XMM registers and enables them but
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#51797
·
|
|
Re: [[meta-mingw][PATCH] libgcrypt: disable amd64 optimization
Note, this is still happening. Using meta-mingw w/ gatesgarth to build, and
including libgcrypt I get the same failure. The failure resolves with
"--disable-amd64-as-feature-detection".
Looking at
Note, this is still happening. Using meta-mingw w/ gatesgarth to build, and
including libgcrypt I get the same failure. The failure resolves with
"--disable-amd64-as-feature-detection".
Looking at
|
By
Mark Hatle
·
#51796
·
|
|
Re: Cross compiler which runs on the target architecture
Hi Khem,
Am 09.12.20 um 19:23 schrieb Khem Raj:
The cross-canadian changes the HOST variables and not the TARGET_ variables. I need to change the TARGET variables but keep the HOST variables. It
Hi Khem,
Am 09.12.20 um 19:23 schrieb Khem Raj:
The cross-canadian changes the HOST variables and not the TARGET_ variables. I need to change the TARGET variables but keep the HOST variables. It
|
By
Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
·
#51795
·
|
|
Re: [meta-tensorflow][PATCH 1/25] openjdk-8-native: 212b04 -> 275b01
Is there a project policy reason that all these patches are posted in
the main list instead of a dev list? Isn't there a list specifically
for this kind of thing, to separate questions and info
Is there a project policy reason that all these patches are posted in
the main list instead of a dev list? Isn't there a list specifically
for this kind of thing, to separate questions and info
|
By
Kent Dorfman <kent.dorfman766@...>
·
#51794
·
|
|
Re: Cross compiler which runs on the target architecture
Hi Peter,
Am 09.12.20 um 14:32 schrieb Peter Saunderson:
Thanks for the links but your solution looks very complex. I will try to improve the examples from Richard.
Regards
Stefan
Hi Peter,
Am 09.12.20 um 14:32 schrieb Peter Saunderson:
Thanks for the links but your solution looks very complex. I will try to improve the examples from Richard.
Regards
Stefan
|
By
Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
·
#51793
·
|