|
Re: glib-2.0-native build fails on bernard
for bernard (with MACHINE ??= qemux86 and DISTRO ?= poky) glib-2.0_2.26.1.bb is pulled in, so the above
patch does not apply. I tried something similar:
diff --git
for bernard (with MACHINE ??= qemux86 and DISTRO ?= poky) glib-2.0_2.26.1.bb is pulled in, so the above
patch does not apply. I tried something similar:
diff --git
|
By
Andre Haupt <andre@...>
·
#2324
·
|
|
Fullpass test report for Yocto1.1 M3 RC3 build
Hi All,
This is the Fullpass test report for Yocto1.1 M3 RC3 build. There are three new bugs found in this testing compared with weekly testing. Hob and some core build feature tests are added.
Hi All,
This is the Fullpass test report for Yocto1.1 M3 RC3 build. There are three new bugs found in this testing compared with weekly testing. Hob and some core build feature tests are added.
|
By
Fan, WenhuaX <wenhuax.fan@...>
·
#2322
·
|
|
Re: glib-2.0-native build fails on bernard
I had the same issue on 64-bit fedora R15. This patch fixed it for me:
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/8233/
- Jani Uusi-Rantala
________________________________________
Sent: Friday,
I had the same issue on 64-bit fedora R15. This patch fixed it for me:
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/8233/
- Jani Uusi-Rantala
________________________________________
Sent: Friday,
|
By
jani.uusi-rantala@...
·
#2321
·
|
|
glib-2.0-native build fails on bernard
Hi all,
Bitbake glib-2.0-native for the qemux86 target on poky bernard fails
with:
octo-git/builds/qemux86-bernard/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib
| ./.libs/libglib-2.0.so: undefined reference to
Hi all,
Bitbake glib-2.0-native for the qemux86 target on poky bernard fails
with:
octo-git/builds/qemux86-bernard/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib
| ./.libs/libglib-2.0.so: undefined reference to
|
By
Andre Haupt <andre@...>
·
#2320
·
|
|
Re: bbappend - Where should my file be?
Scott / Bruce,
I should have mentioned that ;-) As the bbappend file is in my layer, I was expecting (and want) the defconfig file to be stored/found in it. I created this layer by copying another
Scott / Bruce,
I should have mentioned that ;-) As the bbappend file is in my layer, I was expecting (and want) the defconfig file to be stored/found in it. I created this layer by copying another
|
By
Chris Tapp
·
#2323
·
|
|
ELCE Presentations
Hi all,
The Linux Foundation is rolling out responses to submissions for ELCE. If you submitted a talk that is related to the Yocto Project that was accepted, please let me know so I can keep track
Hi all,
The Linux Foundation is rolling out responses to submissions for ELCE. If you submitted a talk that is related to the Yocto Project that was accepted, please let me know so I can keep track
|
By
Osier-mixon, Jeffrey <jeffrey.osier-mixon@...>
·
#2319
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/2] preempt-rt support for meta-yocto BSPs
Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#2318
·
|
|
Re: bbappend - Where should my file be?
Yep, bitbake is telling us where it is looking. The -wrs_git is the
extension to the recipe, so that isn't where it is looking.
On another note, there's been a lot of fixes to the kern tools
Yep, bitbake is telling us where it is looking. The -wrs_git is the
extension to the recipe, so that isn't where it is looking.
On another note, there's been a lot of fixes to the kern tools
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#2317
·
|
|
Re: bbappend - Where should my file be?
It looks like this is where the file is expected.
I believe also meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux/defconfig should also work.
Scott
--
Scott Garman
Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project
Intel
It looks like this is where the file is expected.
I believe also meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux/defconfig should also work.
Scott
--
Scott Garman
Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project
Intel
|
By
Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@...>
·
#2316
·
|
|
bbappend - Where should my file be?
I've got a linux-wrs_git.bbappend file in a layer (under poky laverne 4.0.1) that contains:
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_Vortex86DX = "Vortex86DX"
WRMACHINE_Vortex86DX = "common_pc"
FILESEXTRAPATHS :=
I've got a linux-wrs_git.bbappend file in a layer (under poky laverne 4.0.1) that contains:
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_Vortex86DX = "Vortex86DX"
WRMACHINE_Vortex86DX = "common_pc"
FILESEXTRAPATHS :=
|
By
Chris Tapp
·
#2315
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/2] allow override of kernel provider
Allow users or layers to override PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel.
This is required to use the linux-yocto-rt kernel, for example.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
---
Allow users or layers to override PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel.
This is required to use the linux-yocto-rt kernel, for example.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
---
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2314
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/2] add linux-yocto-rt_3.0 support for all meta-intel BSPs
All the BSPs build out of the preempt-rt/base branch (rather than a
preempt-rt/$MACHINE branch), so separate KMACHINE and KBRANCH assignments are
required for each BSP.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart
All the BSPs build out of the preempt-rt/base branch (rather than a
preempt-rt/$MACHINE branch), so separate KMACHINE and KBRANCH assignments are
required for each BSP.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2313
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/2][meta-intel] Add linux-yocto-rt_3.0 support to all BSPs
This patch series adds the necessary linux-yocto-rt bbappend files for each
BSP. It also conditionally sets the kernel provider and version so they can
be overriden by the user or a layer.
All the
This patch series adds the necessary linux-yocto-rt bbappend files for each
BSP. It also conditionally sets the kernel provider and version so they can
be overriden by the user or a layer.
All the
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2312
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/2] meta-yocto: add linux-yocto-rt support for all meta-yocto machines
Provide the necessary info in the linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend to
support building the RT kernel for each of the meta-yocto example
BSPs.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
---
Provide the necessary info in the linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend to
support building the RT kernel for each of the meta-yocto example
BSPs.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
---
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2311
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/2] meta-yocto: allow for virtual/kernel override
Conditionally assign the PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel in the meta-yocto
machine configs to allow the user or other layers to override it. This is
required to use the linux-yocto-rt kernel, for
Conditionally assign the PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel in the meta-yocto
machine configs to allow the user or other layers to override it. This is
required to use the linux-yocto-rt kernel, for
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2310
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/2] preempt-rt support for meta-yocto BSPs
This series add build and boot tested support for the atom-pc and mpc8315e-rdb.
The routerstationpro and beagleboard still suffer from build failures and are
commented out.
The following changes
This series add build and boot tested support for the atom-pc and mpc8315e-rdb.
The routerstationpro and beagleboard still suffer from build failures and are
commented out.
The following changes
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2309
·
|
|
Re: Yocto Technical Team - (Tuesday, August 16, 2011 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada))
Since quite some people will be in the LinuxCon next week, I’m thinking cancelling this occurrence of the meeting. We will be in M4 and the focus is on bug fixing. I don’t have any specific agenda
Since quite some people will be in the LinuxCon next week, I’m thinking cancelling this occurrence of the meeting. We will be in M4 and the focus is on bug fixing. I don’t have any specific agenda
|
By
Liu, Song <song.liu@...>
·
#2308
·
|
|
Re: Magic/File problems
Jani,
This patch looks good, can you please do a proper git patch with a Signed-off-by: line.
For details please refer to
http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
The
Jani,
This patch looks good, can you please do a proper git patch with a Signed-off-by: line.
For details please refer to
http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
The
|
By
Saul Wold <sgw@...>
·
#2307
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 02/17] meta/rt: beagleboard preempt-rt support
I'll put something in place when merging. It really isn't
very interesting, and is something that we can better describe
outside of commits if anyone is interested. So a free pass
on this one, and
I'll put something in place when merging. It really isn't
very interesting, and is something that we can better describe
outside of commits if anyone is interested. So a free pass
on this one, and
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#2306
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 00/17][linux-yocto-3.0:meta] preempt-rt update (3.0.1-rt8 scc's)
Ack'd. This is good data, and we'll pull this in, since
it improves the situation greatly. There is no guarantee
that -rt will build and boot on ALL bsps, so having some
non-functional boards is
Ack'd. This is good data, and we'll pull this in, since
it improves the situation greatly. There is no guarantee
that -rt will build and boot on ALL bsps, so having some
non-functional boards is
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#2305
·
|