|
Re: Strange USB behavior
I'll give it a try (will be a while as I've moved to the 5.0.1 release and the build has just started!).
Thanks for the suggestion :-)
Chris Tapp
opensource@...
www.keylevel.com
I'll give it a try (will be a while as I've moved to the 5.0.1 release and the build has just started!).
Thanks for the suggestion :-)
Chris Tapp
opensource@...
www.keylevel.com
|
By
Chris Tapp
·
#2407
·
|
|
Re: Strange USB behavior
I asked Sarah Sharp if she had any thoughts, she responded in part:
One thing I might suspect is a problem with the host controller going
into suspend. I think 2.6.34 didn't have support for USB
I asked Sarah Sharp if she had any thoughts, she responded in part:
One thing I might suspect is a problem with the host controller going
into suspend. I think 2.6.34 didn't have support for USB
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2406
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/2] preempt-rt support for meta-yocto BSPs
I haven't seen this merged yet, been a week. Is there a concern with the
series, or maybe it just got lost in the mix?
Thanks,
Darren
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto
I haven't seen this merged yet, been a week. Is there a concern with the
series, or maybe it just got lost in the mix?
Thanks,
Darren
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto
|
By
Darren Hart <darren.hart@...>
·
#2405
·
|
|
Re: Strange USB behavior
Aha. We've seen similar things here over the years. At least
this doesn't sound like it caused too much pain.
Cheers,
Bruce
Aha. We've seen similar things here over the years. At least
this doesn't sound like it caused too much pain.
Cheers,
Bruce
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#2404
·
|
|
Re: Strange USB behavior
Looks like this is just a kernel load order issue.
The USB storage device seems to cause the sound device to initialise earlier in the boot so it's ready when ALSA loads. Without it, it's not
Looks like this is just a kernel load order issue.
The USB storage device seems to cause the sound device to initialise earlier in the boot so it's ready when ALSA loads. Without it, it's not
|
By
Chris Tapp
·
#2403
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 06/12] meta-crownbay: update README
Right, but it doesn't work and isn't exactly user-friendly:
COMMERCIAL_LICENSE := "${@oe_filter_out('emgd-driver-bin',
'${COMMERCIAL_LICENSE}',
Right, but it doesn't work and isn't exactly user-friendly:
COMMERCIAL_LICENSE := "${@oe_filter_out('emgd-driver-bin',
'${COMMERCIAL_LICENSE}',
|
By
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
·
#2402
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 06/12] meta-crownbay: update README
Tom,
I thought we talked about using the oe_filter mechanism here instead of a flat override, since this will bring in other COMMERCIAL_LICENSED content.
Sau!
Tom,
I thought we talked about using the oe_filter mechanism here instead of a flat override, since this will bring in other COMMERCIAL_LICENSED content.
Sau!
|
By
Saul Wold <sgw@...>
·
#2401
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs
'%' can be used only at the end and it's expected to produce only 1
match
like 1.0+git%
if there is only one version starting '1.0+git' and we just don't know
exact SRCPV/SRCREV
'%' can be used only at the end and it's expected to produce only 1
match
like 1.0+git%
if there is only one version starting '1.0+git' and we just don't know
exact SRCPV/SRCREV
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#2400
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs
We can get away from it without setting preferred version by
either the default preference scheme, or by virtue of removing
the default preferred version from poky.conf. I'm working on
the latter
We can get away from it without setting preferred version by
either the default preference scheme, or by virtue of removing
the default preferred version from poky.conf. I'm working on
the latter
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#2399
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs
It is a wildcard .. I tried briefly to get it to match the point
release. I had the same problem here, and didn't get the right
combination to match the point release. I'll look at it more today
as
It is a wildcard .. I tried briefly to get it to match the point
release. I had the same problem here, and didn't get the right
combination to match the point release. I'll look at it more today
as
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#2398
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs
Maybe the extra load isn't a big deal, but at least the SRCREVs can
change most of the time without breaking everything like this does.
It would be great not to have to set the preferred version at
Maybe the extra load isn't a big deal, but at least the SRCREVs can
change most of the time without breaking everything like this does.
It would be great not to have to set the preferred version at
|
By
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
·
#2397
·
|
|
Strange USB behavior
I'm running on a platform using the Vortex86DX SoC which includes a CM119 USB audio interface.
I've got a kernel configuration that recognizes and initializes this ok (dmesg reports it as an ALSA
I'm running on a platform using the Vortex86DX SoC which includes a CM119 USB audio interface.
I've got a kernel configuration that recognizes and initializes this ok (dmesg reports it as an ALSA
|
By
Chris Tapp
·
#2396
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs
and 3.0.3 is out...
Don't forget the -rt variant, it is still at 3.0.
It makes a lot more sense to me to specify the kernel to use in the
machine config and not allow whatever recipe claim
and 3.0.3 is out...
Don't forget the -rt variant, it is still at 3.0.
It makes a lot more sense to me to specify the kernel to use in the
machine config and not allow whatever recipe claim
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2395
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs
Another thought on this is that we follow up on the discussion that
we had when I first had to force some boards back to 2.6.37. We drop
all the preferred version manipulations and control this
Another thought on this is that we follow up on the discussion that
we had when I first had to force some boards back to 2.6.37. We drop
all the preferred version manipulations and control this
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#2394
·
|
|
Re: linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs
I made this change due to some other explicit requests about the
kernel version not being obvious. I don't really see this as a big
deal, I'm already updating SRCREVs, we are already updating
I made this change due to some other explicit requests about the
kernel version not being obvious. I don't really see this as a big
deal, I'm already updating SRCREVs, we are already updating
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#2393
·
|
|
linux-yocto 3.0.1 upgrade broke PREFERRED_VERSION setting in BSPs
We have just rolled out PREFERRED_VERSION="3.0+git%", and these now fail
with messages like:
NOTE: preferred version 3.0+git% of linux-yocto not available (for item
virtual/kernel)
I could patch
We have just rolled out PREFERRED_VERSION="3.0+git%", and these now fail
with messages like:
NOTE: preferred version 3.0+git% of linux-yocto not available (for item
virtual/kernel)
I could patch
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2392
·
|
|
setting preferred provider for "virtual/libx11"?
with latest poky git pull, did "bitbake -c fetchall world" just for
fun and got:
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NOTE: Preparing runqueue
ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be
with latest poky git pull, did "bitbake -c fetchall world" just for
fun and got:
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
NOTE: Preparing runqueue
ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#2391
·
|
|
Re: Configuring a layer to support multiple targets
Thanks, but please don't speed too much time on it if 'standard' isn't going to work. This is only a research project at the moment and I can patch my defconf easily enough for now (especially as it
Thanks, but please don't speed too much time on it if 'standard' isn't going to work. This is only a research project at the moment and I can patch my defconf easily enough for now (especially as it
|
By
Chris Tapp
·
#2390
·
|
|
Re: Configuring a layer to support multiple targets
That's what I was trying to say ;-)
I am.
Sounds like a plan. Where can I find a list of the branches in the 4.0.1 meta data? I'm using the following to select one at the
That's what I was trying to say ;-)
I am.
Sounds like a plan. Where can I find a list of the branches in the 4.0.1 meta data? I'm using the following to select one at the
|
By
Chris Tapp
·
#2389
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 10/12] meta-fri2: make the use of emgd-driver-bin COMMERCIAL
Alright, sounds like a bigger project to get it out of the layer.conf
and probably something we need to get into the documentation somewhere.
This series looks fine to me otherwise.
--
Darren
Alright, sounds like a bigger project to get it out of the layer.conf
and probably something we need to get into the documentation somewhere.
This series looks fine to me otherwise.
--
Darren
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#2388
·
|