The linux-yocto recipes have been renamed to include explicit version numbers. The meta-intel bbappends must be updated to follow the new naming convention. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield

Tom/Darren/Saul, Not sure who wants to proxy these into meta-intel for me, so I've copied you all. Now that the recipe renames for linux-yocto in the main repos, meta-intel needs to be updated as

Ooops. The content is fine here, but when composing email directly with git send-email. Don't forget to put in a valid sender and subject line, or you get strange looking email!! Sorry about the

The linux-yocto recipes have been renamed to include explicit version numbers. The meta-intel bbappends must be updated to follow the new naming convention. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield

Not sure who wants to proxy these into meta-intel for me, so I've copied you all. Now that the recipe renames for linux-yocto in the main repos, meta-intel needs to be updated as well. These are the

ack'd. These look good. I'm just finishing up the recipe renames for linux-yocto and will start feature merging into the kernel repo shortly. I'd expect to have this in by end of day. Bruce

Ah, I see. OK. OK. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel

Tested-by: Tom Zanuss <tom.zanussi@...>

Hmm, not following you here - why would I want a new image recipe for systemtap? Systemtap fits in with the other profiling tools in the task-core-tools-profile as far as I can see; this patch

Wouldn't it make more sense to add systemtap to and image recipe, either a new recipe or a bbappend? Also, it seems to me that RRECOMMENDS would make more sense than RDEPENDS - as it isn't required

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> To configure crownbay, crownbay-noemgd, fishriver, jasperforest, n450, and sugarbay as compatible machines for systemtap. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> To configure this is a compatible machine for systemtap. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> --- .../systemtap/systemtap_git.bbappend

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> Add a 'utrace feature' that turns on the kernel options required for utrace, used mainly to enable userspace tracing for systemtap. Signed-off-by: Tom

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> This adds a utrace feature, in support of userspace tracing for systemtap. It's been tested on actual x86 and x86-64 hardware, as well as qemux86-64 and

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> Used by SystemTap. Patch generated by diff of 2.6.37 base and utrace branches of the official utrace git repo

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> This adds support for utrace to linux-yocto, for userspace tracing in systemtap. Please pull into the yocto/base branch linux-yocto. Pull URL:

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> Removing any old references to systemtap from meta means we need to add it here. It also adds systemtap support for the other, previously uncovered

Hi all, The open bug number of last week increased to 210. QA finished Yocto 1.1 M1 testing with no critical bugs open now. Bug status of WW24 could be found on

It's my intention to get the document updated ASAP so that we don't confuse anyone else as to which version to download. Regards, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Build System Monkey

I have pending fixes for a number of the build_errors list, many where dependency issues that build on a full build, I am going to research those. We have bugs for alsa-tools, gobject-interospection