|
Re: who are using archlinux?
thanks your reply, indeed, this is not the first email thread about the
gconf compile problem. it in there only because of no echo.
I have installed python2, and made a symlink in the build
thanks your reply, indeed, this is not the first email thread about the
gconf compile problem. it in there only because of no echo.
I have installed python2, and made a symlink in the build
|
By
niqingliang
·
#5576
·
|
|
Re: Support of meta-kde for Poky
I don't think any is needed (at least I don't think anyone asked for any of
the other layers).
That's right, the layer is supposed to be used as a unit; which means those
units are supposed to be
I don't think any is needed (at least I don't think anyone asked for any of
the other layers).
That's right, the layer is supposed to be used as a unit; which means those
units are supposed to be
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#5575
·
|
|
Re: Support of meta-kde for Poky
2012/3/26 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>:
Do I need an official statement, and from whom can I get it in case?
My assumption is that the initial request, that started this
discussion,
2012/3/26 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@...>:
Do I need an official statement, and from whom can I get it in case?
My assumption is that the initial request, that started this
discussion,
|
By
Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@...>
·
#5574
·
|
|
Re: who are using archlinux?
I use Archlinux for OE/Yocto, could you post your error so we can get an idea of the problem you are having?
One note for Archlinux is that it ships Python 3 as default, to you must install Python2
I use Archlinux for OE/Yocto, could you post your error so we can get an idea of the problem you are having?
One note for Archlinux is that it ships Python 3 as default, to you must install Python2
|
By
Jack Mitchell <ml@...>
·
#5573
·
|
|
Re: Deleting layers in Hob
By
Lu, Lianhao <lianhao.lu@...>
·
#5572
·
|
|
Deleting layers in Hob
When using Hob in Yocto Project, I found a issue when deleting layers. I
think I ever raised this problem before.
Let me briefly introduce how layer removal works in Hob. When user
changes a layer,
When using Hob in Yocto Project, I found a issue when deleting layers. I
think I ever raised this problem before.
Let me briefly introduce how layer removal works in Hob. When user
changes a layer,
|
By
Xu, Dongxiao <dongxiao.xu@...>
·
#5571
·
|
|
Re: pseudo interaction issue
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> wrote:
I think that part could be, but this doesn't explain why adding the
popen() wrapper doesn't fix it. Oh, wait. Yes, it does. I think I
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> wrote:
I think that part could be, but this doesn't explain why adding the
popen() wrapper doesn't fix it. Oh, wait. Yes, it does. I think I
|
By
Peter Seebach <peter.seebach@...>
·
#5570
·
|
|
Re: who are using archlinux?
my sutdent.
By
James W. <wjn740@...>
·
#5569
·
|
|
who are using archlinux?
who are using archlinux? I want to talk about gconf compile fail
problem.
--
Yi Qingliang
niqingliang@...
https://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
who are using archlinux? I want to talk about gconf compile fail
problem.
--
Yi Qingliang
niqingliang@...
https://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com
|
By
niqingliang
·
#5568
·
|
|
Re: tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary
Thanks, Richard. Clearer now but not entirely.
Yes, it removes it from being parsed. I used, for test although not sensible, BBMASK = "base-passwd". If I then tried building core-image-minimal it
Thanks, Richard. Clearer now but not entirely.
Yes, it removes it from being parsed. I used, for test although not sensible, BBMASK = "base-passwd". If I then tried building core-image-minimal it
|
By
Rudolf Streif <rudolf.streif@...>
·
#5567
·
|
|
Re: tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary
BBMASK removes recipes from being parsed. It does not remove them from
images although that would I guess be an indirect result since you could
no longer build them.
Its designed so that if you for
BBMASK removes recipes from being parsed. It does not remove them from
images although that would I guess be an indirect result since you could
no longer build them.
Its designed so that if you for
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#5566
·
|
|
Re: can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?
Rudi,
Great comments! Thanks very much. I will immediately update the revision history tables to show the 1.2 release as WIP. Not having it there did cause you confusion. Good suggestion.
Rudi,
Great comments! Thanks very much. I will immediately update the revision history tables to show the 1.2 release as WIP. Not having it there did cause you confusion. Good suggestion.
|
By
Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...>
·
#5565
·
|
|
Re: can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?
Scott,
Yes, I looked at that one but I now noticed that I referenced it incorrectly. This is the latest version, however, in the revision history it shows "Revision 1.1, October 6, 2011, Released with
Scott,
Yes, I looked at that one but I now noticed that I referenced it incorrectly. This is the latest version, however, in the revision history it shows "Revision 1.1, October 6, 2011, Released with
|
By
Rudolf Streif <rudolf.streif@...>
·
#5564
·
|
|
Re: pseudo interaction issue
This is why I'm not saying lets just set PSEUDO_PREFIX. Its bothering me
too.
Obviously :). Except the code does this and I've watched it happen. I'm
not claiming to understand it...
When we poke
This is why I'm not saying lets just set PSEUDO_PREFIX. Its bothering me
too.
Obviously :). Except the code does this and I've watched it happen. I'm
not claiming to understand it...
When we poke
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#5548
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/2] sato: Remove questioned ISO image
[YOCTO #1487]
For the liveCD image, interactive bootup is needed, but psplash prevents from
booting interactively. In such case ISO image is not usable, so remove ISO image
and the corresponding link
[YOCTO #1487]
For the liveCD image, interactive bootup is needed, but psplash prevents from
booting interactively. In such case ISO image is not usable, so remove ISO image
and the corresponding link
|
By
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...>
·
#5546
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/2] initrdscripts: fix init-live.sh and use unionfs
[YOCTO #1487]
Use unionfs to mount rootfs and make root file system can be writen when using liveCD to boot up.
Set UNION_FS variable depending on kenrel config, so that it can work with kernel which
[YOCTO #1487]
Use unionfs to mount rootfs and make root file system can be writen when using liveCD to boot up.
Set UNION_FS variable depending on kenrel config, so that it can work with kernel which
|
By
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...>
·
#5545
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/2] Fix init-live.sh to use unionfs for live CD and remove questioned ISO image
Use unionfs to mount rootfs and make root file system can be writen when using liveCD to boot up.
Set UNION_FS variable depending on kenrel config, so that it can work with kernel which doesn't
have
Use unionfs to mount rootfs and make root file system can be writen when using liveCD to boot up.
Set UNION_FS variable depending on kenrel config, so that it can work with kernel which doesn't
have
|
By
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...>
·
#5547
·
|
|
Re: can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?
Rudi,
I would like you to examine the “latest” documents (the ones under development). I have added some new licensing information and would like your feedback for this upcoming version.
Rudi,
I would like you to examine the “latest” documents (the ones under development). I have added some new licensing information and would like your feedback for this upcoming version.
|
By
Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...>
·
#5544
·
|
|
Re: can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?
The ability of collecting licensing information, tracking license changes and providing the license information automatically with the images and packages for deployment is in my opinion a major
The ability of collecting licensing information, tracking license changes and providing the license information automatically with the images and packages for deployment is in my opinion a major
|
By
Rudolf Streif <rudolf.streif@...>
·
#5543
·
|
|
Re: pseudo interaction issue
Oh, nevermind, I just realized: We use antimagic as the implementation
goo for PSEUDO_DISABLED.
So a call to os.popen() from a program which has PSEUDO_DISABLED set is
going to think it's in
Oh, nevermind, I just realized: We use antimagic as the implementation
goo for PSEUDO_DISABLED.
So a call to os.popen() from a program which has PSEUDO_DISABLED set is
going to think it's in
|
By
Peter Seebach <peter.seebach@...>
·
#5542
·
|