|
Re: edison/denzil patches (post-1.1.2 and 1.2.1)
Great, the best thing would be to submit a pull request against the
edison branch with a suitable subject.
Congratulations! I appreciate your effort in sharing this work.
Joshua
Great, the best thing would be to submit a pull request against the
edison branch with a suitable subject.
Congratulations! I appreciate your effort in sharing this work.
Joshua
|
By
Joshua Lock <josh@...>
·
#7927
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] Fix for psplash segmentation fault
Merged into psplash upstream, if you would like to send a patch to Openembedded-Core updating the psplash recipe that would be welcome also.
Thanks
Sau!
Merged into psplash upstream, if you would like to send a patch to Openembedded-Core updating the psplash recipe that would be welcome also.
Thanks
Sau!
|
By
Saul Wold <sgw@...>
·
#7920
·
|
|
Re: edison/denzil patches (post-1.1.2 and 1.2.1)
Thanks Scott,
I'm closing up on the edison branch changes and testing and I will be
adding more to the denzil branch soon.
-M
Thanks Scott,
I'm closing up on the edison branch changes and testing and I will be
adding more to the denzil branch soon.
-M
|
By
McClintock Matthew-B29882 <B29882@...>
·
#7919
·
|
|
Re: edison/denzil patches (post-1.1.2 and 1.2.1)
Cool, this is a fairly convenient way for me to merge in these commits. Like Joshua has pointed out, as long as they are bugfixes and don't introduce significant feature additions or create backward
Cool, this is a fairly convenient way for me to merge in these commits. Like Joshua has pointed out, as long as they are bugfixes and don't introduce significant feature additions or create backward
|
By
Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@...>
·
#7918
·
|
|
Re: edison/denzil patches (post-1.1.2 and 1.2.1)
I'm fine to have some of them rejected, such is how things work ;)
I know what you mean ;)
Yep, I've made my best effort to only backport commits already upstream.
I understand. I'm fine with
I'm fine to have some of them rejected, such is how things work ;)
I know what you mean ;)
Yep, I've made my best effort to only backport commits already upstream.
I understand. I'm fine with
|
By
McClintock Matthew-B29882 <B29882@...>
·
#7917
·
|
|
Re: edison/denzil patches (post-1.1.2 and 1.2.1)
Indeed, that's likely the sum of it but the changes in isolation don't offer any context as to why they're required for PPC so my gut reaction is to reject them as they violate the suggested
Indeed, that's likely the sum of it but the changes in isolation don't offer any context as to why they're required for PPC so my gut reaction is to reject them as they violate the suggested
|
By
Joshua Lock <josh@...>
·
#7916
·
|
|
Re: edison/denzil patches (post-1.1.2 and 1.2.1)
OK.
Yes.
I see very little of this, the valgrind series and/or the a few other
image generation bits.
So is poky edison dead now? How do I support folks that still want to
use it? I understand that
OK.
Yes.
I see very little of this, the valgrind series and/or the a few other
image generation bits.
So is poky edison dead now? How do I support folks that still want to
use it? I understand that
|
By
McClintock Matthew-B29882 <B29882@...>
·
#7915
·
|
|
Re: edison/denzil patches (post-1.1.2 and 1.2.1)
I don't know how much work will be done on Edison after the 1.1.2 release. I personally will no longer be working on it and I don't think the team here as enough resources to maintain it
I don't know how much work will be done on Edison after the 1.1.2 release. I personally will no longer be working on it and I don't think the team here as enough resources to maintain it
|
By
Joshua Lock <josh@...>
·
#7914
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/2] emgd/pvr: get it building with v3.4 kernel
From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@...>
Add emgd config option (DRM_EGD) and modify Makefiles for in-tree
builds.
rebased to v3.4 code
Fix build errors caused by changes to kernel
From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@...>
Add emgd config option (DRM_EGD) and modify Makefiles for in-tree
builds.
rebased to v3.4 code
Fix build errors caused by changes to kernel
|
By
nitin.a.kamble@...
·
#7945
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/2] yocto/emgd: emgd 1.14 driver
By
nitin.a.kamble@...
·
#7949
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/2] emgd 1.14 driver for kernel v3.4
From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@...>
These commits add emgd 1.14 driver support for linux kernel v3.4
These commits need to go in a new branch named "emgd-1.14", so
that it can be merged
From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@...>
These commits add emgd 1.14 driver support for linux kernel v3.4
These commits need to go in a new branch named "emgd-1.14", so
that it can be merged
|
By
nitin.a.kamble@...
·
#7944
·
|
|
Re: Yocto and Qt embedded
Thanks Khem,I successfully found g++ compiler path which is:
/opt/poky/1.2.1/sysroots/i686-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/armv7a-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-g++
now I was able to
Thanks Khem,I successfully found g++ compiler path which is:
/opt/poky/1.2.1/sysroots/i686-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/armv7a-vfp-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-g++
now I was able to
|
By
Giovanni Foiani <fnognn@...>
·
#7913
·
|
|
Building a custom dtb kernel
Aloha all,
I have successfully managed to build a custom kernel, thanks to the
help on IRC. Unfortunately this is only step one of my travels with
Yocto. I now need to be able to build the kernel
Aloha all,
I have successfully managed to build a custom kernel, thanks to the
help on IRC. Unfortunately this is only step one of my travels with
Yocto. I now need to be able to build the kernel
|
By
Andrew Wafaa <awafaa@...>
·
#7912
·
|
|
Multilib build problem
Hello,
With a recent poky tree (updated on 16.07.2012) I'm unable to make a
multilib build. I added these lines to my conf/local.conf:
require conf/multilib.conf
MULTILIBS =
Hello,
With a recent poky tree (updated on 16.07.2012) I'm unable to make a
multilib build. I added these lines to my conf/local.conf:
require conf/multilib.conf
MULTILIBS =
|
By
Marinescu, Bogdan A <bogdan.a.marinescu@...>
·
#7911
·
|
|
Re: beagleboard not booting
Hmmm. And here I was just thinking that things had been quiet on this
front and it was time to get supported move to the 3.4 kernel tree.
Which exact beagleboard (model/revision) is this ? Was the
Hmmm. And here I was just thinking that things had been quiet on this
front and it was time to get supported move to the 3.4 kernel tree.
Which exact beagleboard (model/revision) is this ? Was the
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#7910
·
|
|
Re: linux-xilinx: uImage.dtb files not being generated anymore
Hi,
I found the solution, I had to ensure that the KERNEL_DEVICE tree variable evaluate to the following
KERNEL_DEVICETREE = "${S}/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/virtex440-ml507.dts"
i.e. it was missing
Hi,
I found the solution, I had to ensure that the KERNEL_DEVICE tree variable evaluate to the following
KERNEL_DEVICETREE = "${S}/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/virtex440-ml507.dts"
i.e. it was missing
|
By
Elvis Dowson
·
#7909
·
|
|
Re: linux-xilinx: uImage.dtb files not being generated anymore
Hi Khem,
I tried various combinations, but all of them did not yield a dtb file.
KERNEL_DEVICETREE = "virtex440-ml507.dtb" (as you suggested in your original email, but I guess it might have been a
Hi Khem,
I tried various combinations, but all of them did not yield a dtb file.
KERNEL_DEVICETREE = "virtex440-ml507.dtb" (as you suggested in your original email, but I guess it might have been a
|
By
Elvis Dowson
·
#7908
·
|
|
Re: Error while adding a new recipe
I did the mentioned modification and it worked..
Thanks a lot..
I did the mentioned modification and it worked..
Thanks a lot..
|
By
Navani Srivastava <navani.srivastava@...>
·
#7904
·
|
|
[Package Report System]Upgrade recipes name list
This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers believe some of them needn't to upgrade this time, they can fill in
This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers believe some of them needn't to upgrade this time, they can fill in
|
By
Saul Wold <sgw@...>
·
#7903
·
|
|
[Package Report System]Manual check recipes name list
This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
It will list all the recipes which can't check upstream version by script, and will show how long it is since their last mannual version check.
You can
This mail was sent out by Package Report System.
It will list all the recipes which can't check upstream version by script, and will show how long it is since their last mannual version check.
You can
|
By
Saul Wold <sgw@...>
·
#7902
·
|