|
[RFC 0/8] Integrate yocto documentation into eclipse
From: Timo Mueller <timo.mueller@...>
Hi,
the documentation of the yocto project can currently be viewed online
or as a separate pdf. When using the eclipse ide to develop software
on base
From: Timo Mueller <timo.mueller@...>
Hi,
the documentation of the yocto project can currently be viewed online
or as a separate pdf. When using the eclipse ide to develop software
on base
|
By
mail@...
·
#7989
·
|
|
Re: beagleboard not booting
We are just about to update preferred version of the kernel for the
beagleboard to 3.4 .. but are just finishing with the other hardware
references first.
But everything you need for 3.4.x support is
We are just about to update preferred version of the kernel for the
beagleboard to 3.4 .. but are just finishing with the other hardware
references first.
But everything you need for 3.4.x support is
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#7986
·
|
|
Re: [Solved] Re: Error: PATH contains '.' or '', which will break the build, please remove this.
I'm working on a patch to display the parsed PATH so you'll see the
trailing empty element in that case.
Ross
I'm working on a patch to display the parsed PATH so you'll see the
trailing empty element in that case.
Ross
|
By
Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...>
·
#7985
·
|
|
[Solved] Re: Error: PATH contains '.' or '', which will break the build, please remove this.
Hello,
i've solved the Problem.
A few posts ago there was a hint with a trailing : in a PATH Var.
This was my Problem. Deleting the last : an it works!
This hint could be also integrated in the
Hello,
i've solved the Problem.
A few posts ago there was a hint with a trailing : in a PATH Var.
This was my Problem. Deleting the last : an it works!
This hint could be also integrated in the
|
By
Axel Beierlein <belatronix@...>
·
#7984
·
|
|
Re: Error: PATH contains '.' or '', which will break the build, please remove this.
Actually it's probably worth printing out the parsed PATH when this
warning fires to help solve the problem, I've seen a few people hit
this recently and it's not obvious what the problem is
Actually it's probably worth printing out the parsed PATH when this
warning fires to help solve the problem, I've seen a few people hit
this recently and it's not obvious what the problem is
|
By
Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...>
·
#7983
·
|
|
Re: beagleboard not booting
OK
I know people here will beat me up for my suggestion, but just use the
toolchain you get with Yocto/Poky and build kernel/u-boot as ususal
without it.
Regards,
Robert
..."Rules of Optimization:
OK
I know people here will beat me up for my suggestion, but just use the
toolchain you get with Yocto/Poky and build kernel/u-boot as ususal
without it.
Regards,
Robert
..."Rules of Optimization:
|
By
Robert Berger <gmane@...>
·
#7982
·
|
|
Re: Error: PATH contains '.' or '', which will break the build, please remove this.
That error could be phrased better...
If you don't have a . element, you probably have an empty element
(which is what the '' is trying to say). For example:
/usr/bin:/bin::/home/ross/bin
The ::
That error could be phrased better...
If you don't have a . element, you probably have an empty element
(which is what the '' is trying to say). For example:
/usr/bin:/bin::/home/ross/bin
The ::
|
By
Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...>
·
#7981
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 0/2] emgd 1.14 driver for kernel v3.4
By
Kamble, Nitin A <nitin.a.kamble@...>
·
#7980
·
|
|
Error: PATH contains '.' or '', which will break the build, please remove this.
Hello,
when i start bitbake core-image-minimal i get the Error
"PATH contains '.' or '', which will break the build, please remove this."
But there is definitly no '' a whitespace or a point in my
Hello,
when i start bitbake core-image-minimal i get the Error
"PATH contains '.' or '', which will break the build, please remove this."
But there is definitly no '' a whitespace or a point in my
|
By
Axel Beierlein <belatronix@...>
·
#7979
·
|
|
Re: meta-baryon flexibility
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Joshua Lock <josh@...> wrote:
So if I understand this, it would be better for one of the image.bb files that focused on media to include this particular RRECOMMENDS
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Joshua Lock <josh@...> wrote:
So if I understand this, it would be better for one of the image.bb files that focused on media to include this particular RRECOMMENDS
|
By
Jim Abernathy
·
#7978
·
|
|
beagleboard not booting
Hello,
Close to the USB I see a C and close to speaker XM I am assuming the This is XM-C
What would be the process to use
3.4.x kernel and a mainline u-boot.
I am new to poky and don't know much
Hello,
Close to the USB I see a C and close to speaker XM I am assuming the This is XM-C
What would be the process to use
3.4.x kernel and a mainline u-boot.
I am new to poky and don't know much
|
By
Edward Vidal <vidal.develone@...>
·
#7977
·
|
|
Re: beagleboard not booting
Hi,
Which revison? C?
Can you try to build a mainline 3.4.x kernel and a mainline u-boot and
see what happens?
..."I'm afraid that I've seen too many people fix bugs by looking at
debugger output,
Hi,
Which revison? C?
Can you try to build a mainline 3.4.x kernel and a mainline u-boot and
see what happens?
..."I'm afraid that I've seen too many people fix bugs by looking at
debugger output,
|
By
Robert Berger <gmane@...>
·
#7976
·
|
|
Re: beagleboard not booting
I guess this is what Bruce would like you to try out.
..."I believe it was Andrew Koenig who commented that purists who accept
no compromises in programming languages use either machine code
I guess this is what Bruce would like you to try out.
..."I believe it was Andrew Koenig who commented that purists who accept
no compromises in programming languages use either machine code
|
By
Robert Berger <gmane@...>
·
#7975
·
|
|
beagleboard not booting
Hello,
On a previous posting Bruce Ashfield posted
***********************************
I know that we had to disablePREEMPT to get some of the mmc's to detect and boot, but I can't tellif this is the
Hello,
On a previous posting Bruce Ashfield posted
***********************************
I know that we had to disablePREEMPT to get some of the mmc's to detect and boot, but I can't tellif this is the
|
By
Edward Vidal <vidal.develone@...>
·
#7974
·
|
|
beagleboard not booting
Hello,
The beagleboard that I am using is XM.
I did not modify the kernel at
this is with no uEnv.txt
[vidal@ws009 ~]$ cat no_boot_scr.txt
* - * Qodem 0.1.2 Capture Generated Sun, 15 Jul 2012
Hello,
The beagleboard that I am using is XM.
I did not modify the kernel at
this is with no uEnv.txt
[vidal@ws009 ~]$ cat no_boot_scr.txt
* - * Qodem 0.1.2 Capture Generated Sun, 15 Jul 2012
|
By
Edward Vidal <vidal.develone@...>
·
#7971
·
|
|
Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
Without seeing your configuration, I can't say more. It looks like the
tuning for userspace is 64 and you've built a 32 bit kernel, or vice
versa.
Darren/Tom may be able to help
Without seeing your configuration, I can't say more. It looks like the
tuning for userspace is 64 and you've built a 32 bit kernel, or vice
versa.
Darren/Tom may be able to help
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#7970
·
|
|
Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
By
Bodke, Kishore K <kishore.k.bodke@...>
·
#7969
·
|
|
Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
Can anyone else confirm this ? What BSP is this ? either it isn't
listed above .. or I missed it. Tom ? Darren ? I don't have a build
handy to check.
I can start a build overnight to try and see what
Can anyone else confirm this ? What BSP is this ? either it isn't
listed above .. or I missed it. Tom ? Darren ? I don't have a build
handy to check.
I can start a build overnight to try and see what
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#7968
·
|
|
Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
By
Bodke, Kishore K <kishore.k.bodke@...>
·
#7967
·
|
|
Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build.
Have you tweaked the configuration ?
Cheers,
Bruce
It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build.
Have you tweaked the configuration ?
Cheers,
Bruce
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#7966
·
|