From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> Add a new yocto_layer_create() function that will be used to generate a generic yocto layer (for the new 'yocto-layer' command). Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi

I have a recipe layers I use for test videos and audios that I included in prior BSPs I've done. The last I tested it was Danny and it worked fine. Today I tried to add it to a BSP that had

Hi Chris, Yes, that would be exactly what I want, except that it' not working for me. Probably something obvious, but just in case, any reason why this should not work in denzil? Thanks, Alex

Or in Yocto Project context, we kind of use ADT more inclusive that referring what Mark talked about SDK, the eclipse plug-in and other developers tools. And we don't call out SDK that much.

The biggest clarify problem I've seen is the terms being intermingled. There are clear definitions for each. Toolchain, the compiler and related tools that enable compiling software for a given

It's defind in "lib/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py:36". When TOPDIR is not defined in any of the bitbake configuration files, it's set to current working directory automatically. (...) def

You could use the task-<taskname> override. E.g.: EXTRA_OEMAKE_append_task-do_compile = " FOO=bar" -- Christopher Larson

Hi Ross, One question - is that also true for 'fakesink'? I thought that was supposed to accept any format, but it also throws the same error. My pipeline is just uridecodebin ! fakesink Chris

Hi, Added python source parsing abilities to create-recipe. Signed-off-by: David Nyström <david.nystrom@...> --- scripts/create-recipe | 51

Now i got it. Bitbake handles the variable TOPDIR, LAYERDIR internally. Thanks anyway, Biao

Greetings, I am a newbie tying to understand how bitbake works. There is one line as BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}" in the mybuild/conf/bblayers.conf, i would like to know where the TOPDIR is defined?

Hi, I am using EXTRA_OEMAKE to pass extra flags to make. How can I pass different flags for different tasks? In this case I am compiling an external kernel module and I need different make flags

My 2c (USD) is for clarity on ADT vs. SDK vs. Toolchain. Regards, Sean Liming Owner Annabooks Tel: 714-970-7523 / Cell: 858-774-3176

a general preference on my part, but i think it would be useful if any yocto docs that are discussing toolchains or cross-compilation or the like use *non*-x86 architectures to get the point across.

This mail was sent out by Package Report System. This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers believe some of them needn't to upgrade this time, they can fill in

This mail was sent out by Package Report System. It will list all the recipes which can't check upstream version by script, and will show how long it is since their last mannual version check. You can

I assume you're referring to Eren's blog post: http://hambedded.org/blog/categories/bitbake/ I'll be doing the bitbake manual update and will integrate similar information into the manual, or perhaps

Hi Brian, I may be missing a trick here, but for our internal toolchain I pretty much made a copy of meta-toolchain, made a copy of the toolchain-packagegroup, edited the package group to contain the

Hi, I have defined the following variables defined SOC_FAMILY = virtex-5 in my virtex-5.inc file, which is included by my virtex-5-ml507-powerpc-440.conf machine configuration file. I have

<scott.m.rifenbark@...> wrote: Personally I think it would be great if the bitbake documentation could be updated to include some of the information from Eren's document as well. Eren provides a