|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards
Hi Yann,
Thanks for the patch updates. I'll look at them soon.
I feel exactly the same way.
By default all arm64 kernels are configured with the one, in-kernel, generic
arm64 defconfig. That gives
Hi Yann,
Thanks for the patch updates. I'll look at them soon.
I feel exactly the same way.
By default all arm64 kernels are configured with the one, in-kernel, generic
arm64 defconfig. That gives
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#52796
·
|
|
Re: [error-report-web][PATCH V2] Add local.conf and auto.conf into error details
Sorry about the delay on this, we do really need to get this resolved.
I'm wondering if we should replace the angled brackets test with
https://github.com/mozilla/bleach which would then remove the
Sorry about the delay on this, we do really need to get this resolved.
I'm wondering if we should replace the angled brackets test with
https://github.com/mozilla/bleach which would then remove the
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#52795
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards
BTW, I'm also unclear on what to do next to better support those
boards: with the default
kernel config only a subset of the hardware is supported, and for
state-of-the-art hw
support we'll also need
BTW, I'm also unclear on what to do next to better support those
boards: with the default
kernel config only a subset of the hardware is supported, and for
state-of-the-art hw
support we'll also need
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#52794
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v2] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards, 2GB and 4GB variants
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
---
Changes from v1: split in two distinct machines: nanopi-m4 and nanopi-m4-=
2gb
conf/machine/include/nanopi-m4.inc | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
---
Changes from v1: split in two distinct machines: nanopi-m4 and nanopi-m4-=
2gb
conf/machine/include/nanopi-m4.inc | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#52793
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards
Hi Trevor,
Damned that was how I did my first patch, I just felt it was much
better this way :(
Digging up that original commit re rerolling.
Wouldn't it be useful to have a standard way to
Hi Trevor,
Damned that was how I did my first patch, I just felt it was much
better this way :(
Digging up that original commit re rerolling.
Wouldn't it be useful to have a standard way to
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#52792
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards
Hi Yann,
Thanks for your contribution! :-)
Traditionally in meta-rockchip this is done using two separate machine files
with all the common things factored into a common include file.
Hi Yann,
Thanks for your contribution! :-)
Traditionally in meta-rockchip this is done using two separate machine files
with all the common things factored into a common include file.
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#52791
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH] layer.conf: add hardknott compatibility
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index f9de654ad9f4..8e6b15d18d52
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index f9de654ad9f4..8e6b15d18d52
|
By
Jon Mason
·
#52790
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH] Add machine definitions for NanoPi-M4 boards
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This supports both the 2GB and 4GB versions of the board. This is not
done with 2 different machine definitions since only u-boot has to
change between those
From: Yann Dirson <yann@...>
This supports both the 2GB and 4GB versions of the board. This is not
done with 2 different machine definitions since only u-boot has to
change between those
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#52789
·
|
|
Re: Which recipes put qtwebkit in my image?
Hello.
I find it.
Inside a software there two executables programs which need QtWebKit.
So yocto warn me to include QtWebKit in the imge.
MZ
Sent from Mailspring, the best free email app for work
Hello.
I find it.
Inside a software there two executables programs which need QtWebKit.
So yocto warn me to include QtWebKit in the imge.
MZ
Sent from Mailspring, the best free email app for work
|
By
Mauro Ziliani
·
#52788
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] meta: drop IMA_POLICY from policy recipes
From: Ming Liu <liu.ming50@...>
IMA_POLICY is being referred as policy recipe name in some places and it
is also being referred as policy file in other places, they are
conflicting with each
From: Ming Liu <liu.ming50@...>
IMA_POLICY is being referred as policy recipe name in some places and it
is also being referred as policy file in other places, they are
conflicting with each
|
By
Ming Liu <liu.ming50@...>
·
#52787
·
|
|
Re: Enabling Serial console via uart1(serial1) in cm3(rpi3) kernel 5.4.
#cm3
#dunfell
Hi Zoran,
here is the cat /proc/cmdline output of my cm3-
coherent_pool=1M snd_bcm2835.enable_compat_alsa=0 snd_bcm2835.enable_hdmi=1 snd_bcm2835.enable_headphones=1 bcm2708_fb.fbwidth=720
Hi Zoran,
here is the cat /proc/cmdline output of my cm3-
coherent_pool=1M snd_bcm2835.enable_compat_alsa=0 snd_bcm2835.enable_hdmi=1 snd_bcm2835.enable_headphones=1 bcm2708_fb.fbwidth=720
|
By
@prashant2314
·
#52786
·
|
|
Re: spidev.c ?
Not sure if you did represent these values correctly?!
I have for enc28j60:something like this:
interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
Where <&gpio2> is gpio chip name
Not sure if you did represent these values correctly?!
I have for enc28j60:something like this:
interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
Where <&gpio2> is gpio chip name
|
By
Zoran
·
#52785
·
|
|
Re: How is it possible to build a loadable module from spi-altera.c ...?
My problem is I have an 1553 chip (an avionic data bus) connected to the HPS master (an ARM processor) via an FPGA (soft) SPI controller. This is where the spi-altera.c comes in. It provides the
My problem is I have an 1553 chip (an avionic data bus) connected to the HPS master (an ARM processor) via an FPGA (soft) SPI controller. This is where the spi-altera.c comes in. It provides the
|
By
jchludzinski
·
#52784
·
|
|
How is it possible to build a loadable module from spi-altera.c ...?
How is it possible to build a loadable module from spi-altera.c when it has no code for creating udev files (i.e., /dev/spidevXX); it has no:
static int __init spidev_init(void)
{
int status;
How is it possible to build a loadable module from spi-altera.c when it has no code for creating udev files (i.e., /dev/spidevXX); it has no:
static int __init spidev_init(void)
{
int status;
|
By
jchludzinski
·
#52783
·
|
|
Re: spidev.c ?
Using 'make nconfig' I selected the following options:
(Keep in mind I using an Altera/Intel Arria 10 SoC which uses DesignWare hard SPI controllers. BUT the SPI controllers I'm concerned with now are
Using 'make nconfig' I selected the following options:
(Keep in mind I using an Altera/Intel Arria 10 SoC which uses DesignWare hard SPI controllers. BUT the SPI controllers I'm concerned with now are
|
By
jchludzinski
·
#52782
·
|
|
Re: is there a recent explanation of tricks you can play with MACHINEOVERRIDES?
i did write that a while back while i was still figuring it out. :-)
i agree that it would be inappropriate in the *regular* sections of
the docs, but i'm convinced it would be worth explaining
i did write that a while back while i was still figuring it out. :-)
i agree that it would be inappropriate in the *regular* sections of
the docs, but i'm convinced it would be worth explaining
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#52781
·
|
|
Re: is there a recent explanation of tricks you can play with MACHINEOVERRIDES?
Hi Robert,
Don't use _prepend but =. BEFORE the other includes in your machine configuration files otherwise the order in MACHINEOVERRIDES is incorrect. Do NOT use append, or .=, they result in
Hi Robert,
Don't use _prepend but =. BEFORE the other includes in your machine configuration files otherwise the order in MACHINEOVERRIDES is incorrect. Do NOT use append, or .=, they result in
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#52780
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 2/2] swtpm: update to 0.5.2
Add python package
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../swtpm/{swtpm_0.2.0.bb => swtpm_0.5.2.bb} | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Add python package
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../swtpm/{swtpm_0.2.0.bb => swtpm_0.5.2.bb} | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#52779
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 1/2] tpm2-tss-engine: update 1.1.0
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM hash changed between branches.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../{tpm2-tss-engine_1.0.1.bb => tpm2-tss-engine_1.1.0.bb} | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM hash changed between branches.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../{tpm2-tss-engine_1.0.1.bb => tpm2-tss-engine_1.1.0.bb} | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#52778
·
|
|
Re: does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?
it appears (after a *very* cursory investigation) that
shared-mime-info-native is included, which drags in xmlto-native,
which then drags in docbook stuff. i'll confirm that later.
rday
it appears (after a *very* cursory investigation) that
shared-mime-info-native is included, which drags in xmlto-native,
which then drags in docbook stuff. i'll confirm that later.
rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#52777
·
|