|
Re: bitbake: how to resolve a dependency to kernel-devicetree when building rootfs
<fransmeulenbroeks@...> wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. That was indeed the problem. There was no
kernel-devicetree in my deploy/ipk folder.
But now it works :) I actually did two things, I moved
<fransmeulenbroeks@...> wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. That was indeed the problem. There was no
kernel-devicetree in my deploy/ipk folder.
But now it works :) I actually did two things, I moved
|
By
Hans Beckérus <hans.beckerus@...>
·
#12199
·
|
|
Re: Updating uboot to v2013.01
<swaroop.damarla@...> wrote:
Different board, same core, similar problem ;)
Now I get it. Thanks. But still question remains how in earth I
managed to build the kernel if not also having
<swaroop.damarla@...> wrote:
Different board, same core, similar problem ;)
Now I get it. Thanks. But still question remains how in earth I
managed to build the kernel if not also having
|
By
Hans Beckérus <hans.beckerus@...>
·
#12198
·
|
|
Re: Updating uboot to v2013.01
Hey hans, this is what he meant,
In the machine config file add the following
PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2013.01%" or PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2013.01.01%"
By the way did you already
Hey hans, this is what he meant,
In the machine config file add the following
PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2013.01%" or PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= "v2013.01.01%"
By the way did you already
|
By
Satya Swaroop Damarla <swaroop.damarla@...>
·
#12197
·
|
|
Re: Updating uboot to v2013.01
<rstreif@...> wrote:
Hi Rudi, sorry to chime in , but I have a similar problem but do not
really get the last thing you said.
What do you mean by including the u-boot version in the
<rstreif@...> wrote:
Hi Rudi, sorry to chime in , but I have a similar problem but do not
really get the last thing you said.
What do you mean by including the u-boot version in the
|
By
Hans Beckérus <hans.beckerus@...>
·
#12196
·
|
|
Re: Trying to compile mono on target for machine crownbay
In my case I have resolved it in another way:
correct in Makefile for "eglib" folder SUBDIRS variables and excluded "test"
from them values:
-----------------------------------------
egrep
In my case I have resolved it in another way:
correct in Makefile for "eglib" folder SUBDIRS variables and excluded "test"
from them values:
-----------------------------------------
egrep
|
By
Evgheni Antropov <aidjek@...>
·
#12195
·
|
|
Re: Updating uboot to v2013.01
Satya,
Simply look at the u-boot recipes in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot such as u-boot_2012.04.01.bb. You can simply copy it and name it u-boot_2013.01.bb and then modify SRCREV to the revision that
Satya,
Simply look at the u-boot recipes in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot such as u-boot_2012.04.01.bb. You can simply copy it and name it u-boot_2013.01.bb and then modify SRCREV to the revision that
|
By
Rudolf Streif <rstreif@...>
·
#12194
·
|
|
Updating uboot to v2013.01
Hi Guys,
I need support for uboot on Tamonten board but the version on it is v2012.04 but I came to know that v2012.10 or v2013.01 supports the Tamontenboard through some guys here..
It would be great
Hi Guys,
I need support for uboot on Tamonten board but the version on it is v2012.04 but I came to know that v2012.10 or v2013.01 supports the Tamontenboard through some guys here..
It would be great
|
By
Satya Swaroop Damarla <swaroop.damarla@...>
·
#12193
·
|
|
Re: Avionic Tamonten Board - Uboot problem
The easiest way is to just add the meta-ti layer - they have
a recipe for 2013.01.
n.b. It's common courtesy to keep such discussions on the mailing list so
that everyone benefits from the
The easiest way is to just add the meta-ti layer - they have
a recipe for 2013.01.
n.b. It's common courtesy to keep such discussions on the mailing list so
that everyone benefits from the
|
By
Gary Thomas
·
#12192
·
|
|
Re: Weekly build
We continued to have a build issue which I traced back to the recent
bitbake fetcher changes. I've reverted a part of that and rebuilt master
and its looking even better than the previous build, lots
We continued to have a build issue which I traced back to the recent
bitbake fetcher changes. I've reverted a part of that and rebuilt master
and its looking even better than the previous build, lots
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#12191
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] meta: Search also FILESEXTRAPATHS for systemd service files
Hi,
First, mails that patch oe-core should be sent to the oe-core list,
not yocto@ (which is more of a support channel).
Second this patch won't do what you expect - when you find a file
Hi,
First, mails that patch oe-core should be sent to the oe-core list,
not yocto@ (which is more of a support channel).
Second this patch won't do what you expect - when you find a file
|
By
Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...>
·
#12190
·
|
|
[PATCH] meta: Search also FILESEXTRAPATHS for systemd service files
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@...>
---
meta/classes/systemd.bbclass | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@...>
---
meta/classes/systemd.bbclass | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
|
By
Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@...>
·
#12189
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH] meta: Fix error print
<jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
Whoops. Acked-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@...>
Ross
<jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
Whoops. Acked-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@...>
Ross
|
By
Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...>
·
#12188
·
|
|
Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/1] rpi-first-run-wizard: Fix RDEPENDS warning
Thanks.
--
Andrei Gherzan
m: +40.744.478.414 | f: +40.31.816.28.12
Thanks.
--
Andrei Gherzan
m: +40.744.478.414 | f: +40.31.816.28.12
|
By
Andrei Gherzan
·
#12187
·
|
|
Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/7] rpi-default-providers: Remove virtual/libgl provider
Thank you. You hint is OK and will apply patches with your suggestion.
Thanks.
--
Andrei Gherzan
m: +40.744.478.414 | f: +40.31.816.28.12
Thank you. You hint is OK and will apply patches with your suggestion.
Thanks.
--
Andrei Gherzan
m: +40.744.478.414 | f: +40.31.816.28.12
|
By
Andrei Gherzan
·
#12186
·
|
|
[PATCH] meta: Fix error print
Instead of printing
ERROR: %s does not appear in package list, please add it package-systemd
print
ERROR: package-systemd does not appear in package list, please add it
instead.
Signed-off-by: Jukka
Instead of printing
ERROR: %s does not appear in package list, please add it package-systemd
print
ERROR: package-systemd does not appear in package list, please add it
instead.
Signed-off-by: Jukka
|
By
Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@...>
·
#12185
·
|
|
FW: Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
Hi Amit,
If you want to have a chat about any of the Hobs (GTK or Web), get in touch. We have also set up a mailing list for web hob: you might be interested in
Hi Amit,
If you want to have a chat about any of the Hobs (GTK or Web), get in touch. We have also set up a mailing list for web hob: you might be interested in
|
By
Barros Pena, Belen <belen.barros.pena@...>
·
#12184
·
|
|
Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
Attendees:
AlexD, Cidy, Nitin, PaulE, KevinS, Belen, BjörnS, Amit, Corneliu, Song
Notes:
Song: many of our team members are at ELC this week. They may not be able to attend this meeting.
*
Attendees:
AlexD, Cidy, Nitin, PaulE, KevinS, Belen, BjörnS, Amit, Corneliu, Song
Notes:
Song: many of our team members are at ELC this week. They may not be able to attend this meeting.
*
|
By
Liu, Song <song.liu@...>
·
#12183
·
|
|
Re: bitbake: how to resolve a dependency to kernel-devicetree when building rootfs
Is there a kernel-devicetree package in you tmp/deploy ?
I'm using ipk and I have:
tmp/deploy/ipk/syrcxx/kernel-devicetree_2.6.38-r4_syrcxx.ipk
If it is not there that is your problem.
You may also
Is there a kernel-devicetree package in you tmp/deploy ?
I'm using ipk and I have:
tmp/deploy/ipk/syrcxx/kernel-devicetree_2.6.38-r4_syrcxx.ipk
If it is not there that is your problem.
You may also
|
By
Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@...>
·
#12182
·
|
|
Re: Always removing status files in case of IPK
Yes, better with
IMAGE_FEATURES += "package-management"
sorry.
----- Mail original -----
--
Pierre FICHEUX -/- CTO OW/OS4I, France -\- pierre.ficheux@...
Yes, better with
IMAGE_FEATURES += "package-management"
sorry.
----- Mail original -----
--
Pierre FICHEUX -/- CTO OW/OS4I, France -\- pierre.ficheux@...
|
By
Pierre Ficheux <pierre.ficheux@...>
·
#12181
·
|
|
Re: adt-manual.pdf
yes configure.ac is right naming. Have you filed a bug for it in
bugzilla ? if not I would suggest to file one
yes configure.ac is right naming. Have you filed a bug for it in
bugzilla ? if not I would suggest to file one
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#12180
·
|