|
Re: Additional hardening options
I guess you can submit a patch, and it can be taken for a spin on the autobuilder?
Alex
I guess you can submit a patch, and it can be taken for a spin on the autobuilder?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#55988
·
|
|
Re: Additional hardening options
Another quirk of this - with dunfell, the buildepoxy SDK test fails on Ubuntu
18.04 with -fstack-clash-protection because the version of meson in dunfell
uses the same LDFLAGS value for both host
Another quirk of this - with dunfell, the buildepoxy SDK test fails on Ubuntu
18.04 with -fstack-clash-protection because the version of meson in dunfell
uses the same LDFLAGS value for both host
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#55987
·
|
|
Re: linux-firmware_20211216
Thanks, Khem. I sent a patch to OE.
--
Rudolf J Streif
CEO/CTO ibeeto
+1.855.442.3386 x700
Thanks, Khem. I sent a patch to OE.
--
Rudolf J Streif
CEO/CTO ibeeto
+1.855.442.3386 x700
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
·
#55986
·
|
|
Re: linux-firmware_20211216
<rudolf.streif@...> wrote:
seems an oversight.
<rudolf.streif@...> wrote:
seems an oversight.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#55985
·
|
|
Re: build yocto 2.6 on Ubuntu 20.04
It's been a while, but I was able to build yocto sumo (2.5) using https://github.com/crops/poky-container
It's been a while, but I was able to build yocto sumo (2.5) using https://github.com/crops/poky-container
|
By
Bill Plunkett
·
#55984
·
|
|
Python3 app install best practice
Hi all
I'd like to install my python3 application in a custom folder with all local packages and data.
The source code folder has this
Hi all
I'd like to install my python3 application in a custom folder with all local packages and data.
The source code folder has this
|
By
Mauro Ziliani
·
#55983
·
|
|
linux-firmware_20211216
I got a question about the linux-firmware-bcm4373 package. The link
/lib/firmware/brcm/brcmfmac4373-sdio.clm_blob -> ../cypress/cyfmac4373-sdio.clm_blob
is packaged into linux-firmware and not into
I got a question about the linux-firmware-bcm4373 package. The link
/lib/firmware/brcm/brcmfmac4373-sdio.clm_blob -> ../cypress/cyfmac4373-sdio.clm_blob
is packaged into linux-firmware and not into
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
·
#55982
·
|
|
Re: build yocto 2.6 on Ubuntu 20.04
I think the best way out for you is to set up a container with a supported older distribution. Usually you need an older gcc version from the host machine, so the container will have that.
Alex
I think the best way out for you is to set up a container with a supported older distribution. Usually you need an older gcc version from the host machine, so the container will have that.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#55981
·
|
|
build yocto 2.6 on Ubuntu 20.04
Hi,
Has anyone tried to build yocto 2.6 on Ubuntu 20.04?
I know it's not supported, but it's a major task for me to upgrade to yocto 3.x.
I tried it myself and it fails on building qemu-native.
I
Hi,
Has anyone tried to build yocto 2.6 on Ubuntu 20.04?
I know it's not supported, but it's a major task for me to upgrade to yocto 3.x.
I tried it myself and it fails on building qemu-native.
I
|
By
Jacob Avraham
·
#55980
·
|
|
Preferred provide base-utils issue
Hello,
so I'm a bit at a loss. I admit, I've not yet been using Yocto for a long time. I'm trying to use base-utils as provided by packagegroup-core-base-utils to have a more full featured set of base
Hello,
so I'm a bit at a loss. I admit, I've not yet been using Yocto for a long time. I'm trying to use base-utils as provided by packagegroup-core-base-utils to have a more full featured set of base
|
By
pvanberlo@...
·
#55979
·
|
|
Re: [oe] Inclusive Language Proposal for YP/OE
Hi,
Please don't include CVE twice in the variable name, that's was annoying and just
got used to the CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST one. CVE_CHECK_IGNORE would do.
Cheers,
-Mikko
Hi,
Please don't include CVE twice in the variable name, that's was annoying and just
got used to the CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST one. CVE_CHECK_IGNORE would do.
Cheers,
-Mikko
|
By
Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...>
·
#55978
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] run-docs-build: fix checkout of releases.rst from master
Hi Michael,
One change at a time please ☺️
This should be done right after the git checkout. It's better to ensure what you build is clean that try to ensure the next oneto build has a clean
Hi Michael,
One change at a time please ☺️
This should be done right after the git checkout. It's better to ensure what you build is clean that try to ensure the next oneto build has a clean
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#55977
·
|
|
Building yocto image for RPi CM4
#raspberrypi
Hello All,
Advice on working with Yocto and Raspberry Pi CM4 Lite would be helpful.I recently got my hands on with CM4 and now I want to build Yocto image with u-boot as bootloader. I have few
Hello All,
Advice on working with Yocto and Raspberry Pi CM4 Lite would be helpful.I recently got my hands on with CM4 and now I want to build Yocto image with u-boot as bootloader. I have few
|
By
Sourabh Hegde
·
#55976
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.5_M2.rc6)
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.5_M2.rc6. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.5_M2.rc6. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
|
By
Teoh, Jay Shen
·
#55974
·
|
|
Re: Inclusive Language Proposal for YP/OE
The layer index does already support this, it's just not exposed (at the time
I introduced it - some time ago - I thought it might encourage people to
deviate from the release branch names, but in
The layer index does already support this, it's just not exposed (at the time
I introduced it - some time ago - I thought it might encourage people to
deviate from the release branch names, but in
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#55973
·
|
|
Additional hardening options
Hi folks
I've been looking into a couple of compiler flags for hardening that I think we
might want to consider enabling by default in security-flags.inc:
1) -fstack-clash-protection
This option
Hi folks
I've been looking into a couple of compiler flags for hardening that I think we
might want to consider enabling by default in security-flags.inc:
1) -fstack-clash-protection
This option
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#55972
·
|
|
[yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] schedulers.py: run AUH twice a month
Once a week has proven a bit too hectic: it's better to have
more time to test, submit, review and integrate the updates
before AUH runs again.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
Once a week has proven a bit too hectic: it's better to have
more time to test, submit, review and integrate the updates
before AUH runs again.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#55971
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] Inclusive Language Proposal for YP/OE
Jon,
I've looked over all the changes and agree with Ross on his one suggestion
and that the rest of the changes are fine.
The new terms are equally or in some cases more clear so hopefully that
Jon,
I've looked over all the changes and agree with Ross on his one suggestion
and that the rest of the changes are fine.
The new terms are equally or in some cases more clear so hopefully that
|
By
Randy MacLeod
·
#55970
·
|
|
OpenEmbedded Happy Hour January 26 5pm/1700 UTC
All,
Our next OpenEmbedded Happy Hour is on January 26 for Europe/Americas
timezones @ 1700/5pm UTC (12pm ET / 9am
All,
Our next OpenEmbedded Happy Hour is on January 26 for Europe/Americas
timezones @ 1700/5pm UTC (12pm ET / 9am
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#55969
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] Inclusive Language Proposal for YP/OE
The idea is we're trying to use the language which makes sense and "devel" says
what the branch is/does.
Cheers,
Richard
The idea is we're trying to use the language which makes sense and "devel" says
what the branch is/does.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#55968
·
|