|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder2 2/2] meta-arm doesn't use meta-kernel anymore
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@...>
---
config.py | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.py b/config.py
index a723e3f..520de47 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@...>
---
config.py | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.py b/config.py
index a723e3f..520de47 100644
---
|
By
Ross Burton <ross@...>
·
#53314
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder2 1/2] meta-arm has a hardknott branch now
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@...>
---
schedulers.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py
index 8b166e0..93b8f34 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@...>
---
schedulers.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/schedulers.py b/schedulers.py
index 8b166e0..93b8f34 100644
---
|
By
Ross Burton <ross@...>
·
#53313
·
|
|
Re: Bitbake build failures?
Because your networking is broken in some way and you cannot fetch
from downloads.yoctoproject.org.
Outside of bitbake, try:
wget
Because your networking is broken in some way and you cannot fetch
from downloads.yoctoproject.org.
Outside of bitbake, try:
wget
|
By
Ross Burton <ross@...>
·
#53312
·
|
|
Re: AppArmor with BusyBox
Hi Khem,
Not sure to really understand the question, but the -d option of xargs
is for specifying a delimiter different than the default space.
There is no support for such a thing in Busybox
Hi Khem,
Not sure to really understand the question, but the -d option of xargs
is for specifying a delimiter different than the default space.
There is no support for such a thing in Busybox
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#53311
·
|
|
Re: AppArmor with BusyBox
You are using systemd.
There is a comment regarding coreutils and findutils
|# Add coreutils and findutils only if sysvinit scripts are in use
Patches welcome.
- Armin
|
You are using systemd.
There is a comment regarding coreutils and findutils
|# Add coreutils and findutils only if sysvinit scripts are in use
Patches welcome.
- Armin
|
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#53310
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 6/7] default-distrovars.inc: add wayland/opengl to default distro features
Thanks for the notice. Hmm, it seems that we have done little validation
for the weston image on the Yocto BSPs, I got a boot failure with the
weston image on my beaglebone black board. I will try to
Thanks for the notice. Hmm, it seems that we have done little validation
for the weston image on the Yocto BSPs, I got a boot failure with the
weston image on my beaglebone black board. I will try to
|
By
Kevin Hao
·
#53309
·
|
|
Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for April 27, 2021
Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for April 27, 2021
archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit
== announcements ==
The upcoming Yocto
Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for April 27, 2021
archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit
== announcements ==
The upcoming Yocto
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53308
·
|
|
Re: AppArmor with BusyBox
I think it will be useful to dig a bit further and find out what option does it need from findutils package sometimes this could be solved by using compatible options etc
If we find out that it has
I think it will be useful to dig a bit further and find out what option does it need from findutils package sometimes this could be solved by using compatible options etc
If we find out that it has
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53307
·
|
|
Re: Can layer maintainers add yocto-X.Y tags for yocto-3.3 and later?
Adding Robert, Hongxu and Qi who are likely interested in this topic
for future releases.
Yes. It's always bothered me that the tag wasn't there and now
that oe-core/bitbake/... have been doing it,
Adding Robert, Hongxu and Qi who are likely interested in this topic
for future releases.
Yes. It's always bothered me that the tag wasn't there and now
that oe-core/bitbake/... have been doing it,
|
By
Randy MacLeod
·
#53306
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] config.json: update variable for change in buildstats.bbclass
Signed-off-by: Sakib Sajal <sakib.sajal@...>
---
config.json | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
index fc83012..f82664c 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Sakib Sajal <sakib.sajal@...>
---
config.json | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/config.json b/config.json
index fc83012..f82664c 100644
---
|
By
sakib.sajal@...
·
#53305
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 6/7] default-distrovars.inc: add wayland/opengl to default distro features
Em ter., 27 de abr. de 2021 às 13:10, Randy MacLeod
<randy.macleod@...> escreveu:
Adding wayland seems Ok but forcing the opengl support doesn't seems a
good default. Especially because we
Em ter., 27 de abr. de 2021 às 13:10, Randy MacLeod
<randy.macleod@...> escreveu:
Adding wayland seems Ok but forcing the opengl support doesn't seems a
good default. Especially because we
|
By
Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@...>
·
#53304
·
|
|
Re: AppArmor with BusyBox
I've added `IMAGE_INSTALL += "findutils"` to my `conf/local.conf`
file, and it seems like it was enough. There weren't any build
conflicts.
Should the AppArmor recipe be upgraded in some way to
I've added `IMAGE_INSTALL += "findutils"` to my `conf/local.conf`
file, and it seems like it was enough. There weren't any build
conflicts.
Should the AppArmor recipe be upgraded in some way to
|
By
Konstantin Aladyshev <aladyshev22@...>
·
#53303
·
|
|
Bitbake build failures?
When I trying using bitbake to build openembedded Linux kernel, it dies with these download failures:
NOTE: Fetching uninative binary shim
When I trying using bitbake to build openembedded Linux kernel, it dies with these download failures:
NOTE: Fetching uninative binary shim
|
By
jchludzinski
·
#53302
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 6/7] default-distrovars.inc: add wayland/opengl to default distro features
Randy,
Thanks for bring this issue up.
Err, are they going to check my BSP ; )
The layer index BSP list is long so waiting for feedback may not be
practical. I think it may be more of an
Randy,
Thanks for bring this issue up.
Err, are they going to check my BSP ; )
The layer index BSP list is long so waiting for feedback may not be
practical. I think it may be more of an
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#53301
·
|
|
Re: OpenEmbedded Happy Hour April 28 9pm/2100 UTC
Reminder, next Happy Hour is in one day - everyone is welcome to meet with
fellow developers and chat about any interesting topics over Zoom. BYOB -
bring your own beverage.
--
Regards,
Denys
Reminder, next Happy Hour is in one day - everyone is welcome to meet with
fellow developers and chat about any interesting topics over Zoom. BYOB -
bring your own beverage.
--
Regards,
Denys
|
By
Denys Dmytriyenko
·
#53300
·
|
|
Re: Can layer maintainers add yocto-X.Y tags for yocto-3.3 and later?
So the official starting point is what you are looking for? is there any
expectation to tag for dot release alignment?
What's more important, tag or branch? Many layers hosted on git.yp.org
don't
So the official starting point is what you are looking for? is there any
expectation to tag for dot release alignment?
What's more important, tag or branch? Many layers hosted on git.yp.org
don't
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#53299
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 6/7] default-distrovars.inc: add wayland/opengl to default distro features
Wait a moment, I am not sure I understand the argument about software rendering. Can you please elaborate?
What is the scenario where enabling opengl would regress from something hw-accelerated to
Wait a moment, I am not sure I understand the argument about software rendering. Can you please elaborate?
What is the scenario where enabling opengl would regress from something hw-accelerated to
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#53298
·
|
|
Re: Can layer maintainers add yocto-X.Y tags for yocto-3.3 and later?
<randy.macleod@...> wrote:
I think this could be a good thing, although it does put the burden on
release maintainers. mostly they
test against the tip of the release branch, So if yocto
<randy.macleod@...> wrote:
I think this could be a good thing, although it does put the burden on
release maintainers. mostly they
test against the tip of the release branch, So if yocto
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53297
·
|
|
Re: Can layer maintainers add yocto-X.Y tags for yocto-3.3 and later?
This would be a helpful addition for us when upgrading between named
Yocto releases. Normally, when we are ready to upgrade, we checkout the
HEAD for the named branch and try to get everything
This would be a helpful addition for us when upgrading between named
Yocto releases. Normally, when we are ready to upgrade, we checkout the
HEAD for the named branch and try to get everything
|
By
Claude Bing
·
#53296
·
|
|
Can layer maintainers add yocto-X.Y tags for yocto-3.3 and later?
Hi,
I've CCed some of the maintainers of more widely used Yocto layers
to get comments on about tagging. Please add in people who I may
have missed.
For a while now, oe-core has had a yocto-X.Y
Hi,
I've CCed some of the maintainers of more widely used Yocto layers
to get comments on about tagging. Please add in people who I may
have missed.
For a while now, oe-core has had a yocto-X.Y
|
By
Randy MacLeod
·
#53295
·
|