|
Re: #yocto cmake configurations
#yocto
the cmd seems to pass --sysroot correctly so can you search in SDK sysroot if you have libclang.a libdrm_intel.a and libdrm.a ?
the cmd seems to pass --sysroot correctly so can you search in SDK sysroot if you have libclang.a libdrm_intel.a and libdrm.a ?
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53382
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW18`21
We have discussed extending it but we currently only have the funding for the
originally planned 2 years. Discussions are continuing but since we do all
agree that the next LTS will start then, we
We have discussed extending it but we currently only have the funding for the
originally planned 2 years. Discussions are continuing but since we do all
agree that the next LTS will start then, we
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#53381
·
|
|
Re: #yocto cmake configurations
#yocto
Yes, LLVM & Clang…
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#53380
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 3/3] linux-yocto: add an initial NanoPi-M4 BSP
(sorry, previous answer _is_ empty, wrong button)
Hm, good catch, I ended up not activating the AP6356S in this first
patch, since it would be non-functional
without the proper firmware, and that one
(sorry, previous answer _is_ empty, wrong button)
Hm, good catch, I ended up not activating the AP6356S in this first
patch, since it would be non-functional
without the proper firmware, and that one
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53379
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 3/3] linux-yocto: add an initial NanoPi-M4 BSP
--
Yann Dirson <yann@...>
Blade / Shadow -- http://shadow.tech
--
Yann Dirson <yann@...>
Blade / Shadow -- http://shadow.tech
|
By
Yann Dirson
·
#53378
·
|
|
Re: #yocto cmake configurations
#yocto
I see its using -rdynamic -static
so next question is that do you have .a files in your sdk ?
I see its using -rdynamic -static
so next question is that do you have .a files in your sdk ?
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53377
·
|
|
Re: [meta-zephyr][PATCH] CI: add Gitlab CI support
Please disregard, sloppy scripting bit me
<jdmason=kudzu.us@...> wrote:
Please disregard, sloppy scripting bit me
<jdmason=kudzu.us@...> wrote:
|
By
Jon Mason
·
#53376
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH] CI: add Gitlab CI support
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...>
---
.gitlab-ci.yml | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
ci/96b-avenger96.yml | 9 +
ci/96b-nitrogen.yml
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...>
---
.gitlab-ci.yml | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
ci/96b-avenger96.yml | 9 +
ci/96b-nitrogen.yml
|
By
Jon Mason
·
#53375
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 3/3] linux-yocto: add an initial NanoPi-M4 BSP
It looks to me as though the BRCMFMAC kernel config option needs to be enabled
to support the AP6256S? I don't see that being enabled, does it end up being
pulled in by default or as a result of the
It looks to me as though the BRCMFMAC kernel config option needs to be enabled
to support the AP6256S? I don't see that being enabled, does it end up being
pulled in by default or as a result of the
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53374
·
|
|
what OE/YP layers should be considered "supported"?
related to something that richard purdie mentioned on the OE list,
if one wanted to do a YP-wide "cleanup" of some indeterminate form,
what are the layers that would be considered mandatory to cover
related to something that richard purdie mentioned on the OE list,
if one wanted to do a YP-wide "cleanup" of some indeterminate form,
what are the layers that would be considered mandatory to cover
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#53373
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 2/3] NanoPi-M4: declare "usbhost" and "serial" in MACHINE_FEATURES
applied to master, thanks!
applied to master, thanks!
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53372
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 1/3] NanoPi-M4: let all variants use the same KMACHINE type
applied to master, thanks!
applied to master, thanks!
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53371
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH] CI: add Gitlab CI support
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...>
---
.gitlab-ci.yml | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
ci/96b-avenger96.yml | 9 +
ci/96b-nitrogen.yml
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...>
---
.gitlab-ci.yml | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
ci/96b-avenger96.yml | 9 +
ci/96b-nitrogen.yml
|
By
Jon Mason
·
#53370
·
|
|
Re: #yocto cmake configurations
#yocto
Attached…
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#53369
·
|
|
Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for May 4, 2021
Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for May 4, 2021
archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit
== announcements ==
The upcoming Yocto
Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for May 4, 2021
archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit
== announcements ==
The upcoming Yocto
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53368
·
|
|
Re: #yocto cmake configurations
#yocto
can you post full linker cmd which is failing ?
can you post full linker cmd which is failing ?
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53367
·
|
|
Re: #yocto cmake configurations
#yocto
My standard zeus SDK appears to have an issue linking in my applications dynamic libs…
My standard zeus SDK appears to have an issue linking in my applications dynamic libs…
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#53366
·
|
|
Re: [meta-mingw] [PATCH] mingw-libgnurx: Add recipe
maybe nativesdk-mingw-w64-runtime package can use this as a
dependency, I did not specifically use it as I was trying to build
flex where it was needed
right sent a v2
maybe nativesdk-mingw-w64-runtime package can use this as a
dependency, I did not specifically use it as I was trying to build
flex where it was needed
right sent a v2
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53365
·
|
|
[meta-mingw] [PATCH v2] mingw-libgnurx: Add recipe
This implements glibc regex and will be used by many
packages e.g. flex, therefore add recipe
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
v2: Remove redundant comment
This implements glibc regex and will be used by many
packages e.g. flex, therefore add recipe
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
v2: Remove redundant comment
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53364
·
|
|
Re: [meta-mingw] [PATCH] mingw-libgnurx: Add recipe
Is there some PROVIDES that this should have? How will recipes pull it in as a dependency?
Probably don't need this comment?
Is there some PROVIDES that this should have? How will recipes pull it in as a dependency?
Probably don't need this comment?
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#53363
·
|