|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/1] zephyr-kernel-test: fix Cortex-M tests failure with 2.6.0 kernel
From: Nagesh shamnur <nagesh.shamnur@...>
Edit the test recipe removing obj_tracing tests that have
been removed from Zephyr 2.6.0 release.
Signed-off-by: Nagesh Shamnur
From: Nagesh shamnur <nagesh.shamnur@...>
Edit the test recipe removing obj_tracing tests that have
been removed from Zephyr 2.6.0 release.
Signed-off-by: Nagesh Shamnur
|
By
Wojciech Zmuda
·
#53835
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH 0/1] Partially fix tests failure with 2.6.0 kernel
From: Wojciech Zmuda <wojciech.zmuda@...>
Transition to Zephyr 2.6.0 broke meta-zephyr test suite. This patch fixes
QEMU Cortex-M3 test suite (MACHINE=qemu-cortex-m3 bitbake
From: Wojciech Zmuda <wojciech.zmuda@...>
Transition to Zephyr 2.6.0 broke meta-zephyr test suite. This patch fixes
QEMU Cortex-M3 test suite (MACHINE=qemu-cortex-m3 bitbake
|
By
Wojciech Zmuda
·
#53834
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH] zephyr-blinky: add sample app recipe
From: Davide Ricci <davide.ricci@...>
Blinky is the most referenced sample in Zephyr's documentation and
recall Arduino's first sketch example. This .bb file allows to build
such
From: Davide Ricci <davide.ricci@...>
Blinky is the most referenced sample in Zephyr's documentation and
recall Arduino's first sketch example. This .bb file allows to build
such
|
By
Wojciech Zmuda
·
#53833
·
|
|
Re: [meta-zephyr][PATCH v2 1/2] zephyr-kernel: Add OpenThread add module to build
By
Naveen Saini
·
#53832
·
|
|
Re: [External] [yocto] Bitbake failure
Lots of people use 20.04 so it seems odd that you'd have a problem specific to that host.
Okay, please encourage them to reply on this thread.
We may not always respond
Lots of people use 20.04 so it seems odd that you'd have a problem specific to that host.
Okay, please encourage them to reply on this thread.
We may not always respond
|
By
Randy MacLeod
·
#53831
·
|
|
Re: bitbake controlling memory use
Hi,
Op 10-06-2021 om 21:06 schreef Trevor Gamblin:
Your patch didn't apply clean on Gatesgarth, but fix seemd trivial. With this it builds cmake-native fine, thanks!
You can find it here:
Hi,
Op 10-06-2021 om 21:06 schreef Trevor Gamblin:
Your patch didn't apply clean on Gatesgarth, but fix seemd trivial. With this it builds cmake-native fine, thanks!
You can find it here:
|
By
Ferry Toth
·
#53830
·
|
|
Re: bitbake controlling memory use
Hi,
I've pushed the patch onto my fork of the poky repo at https://github.com/threexc/poky
Let me know how your testing turns out - I am still running tests as well, but it would
Hi,
I've pushed the patch onto my fork of the poky repo at https://github.com/threexc/poky
Let me know how your testing turns out - I am still running tests as well, but it would
|
By
Trevor Gamblin
·
#53829
·
|
|
Re: Building a different GCC version in SDK vs GCC used to build the rootfs/image
So our application might be able to be self contained and bring in all of it's own libs and runtime that it needs. If that case I wouldn't have to supply the sysroot that comes as part of the SDK;
So our application might be able to be self contained and bring in all of it's own libs and runtime that it needs. If that case I wouldn't have to supply the sysroot that comes as part of the SDK;
|
By
greghwang@...
·
#53828
·
|
|
Exporting custom kernel header file to SDK
#kernel
#sdk
Hello,
I wrote a kernel driver which exposes some header to userspace application. Application engineers use generated SDK, so I'd like to export that header file as part of SDK.
I added my header
Hello,
I wrote a kernel driver which exposes some header to userspace application. Application engineers use generated SDK, so I'd like to export that header file as part of SDK.
I added my header
|
By
Lukasz Domowy
·
#53827
·
|
|
Re: Building a different GCC version in SDK vs GCC used to build the rootfs/image
I think this will be hard to support unless your applications are self contained and will bring its own runtime as well in that case you can build a SDK from newer releases which matches compiler you
I think this will be hard to support unless your applications are self contained and will bring its own runtime as well in that case you can build a SDK from newer releases which matches compiler you
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53826
·
|
|
Building a different GCC version in SDK vs GCC used to build the rootfs/image
The backstory is I'm supporting a legacy system built with the Jethro branch and gcc 5.x. I'm wondering instead of upgrading the underlying yocto layers to a more recent branch like Thud which
The backstory is I'm supporting a legacy system built with the Jethro branch and gcc 5.x. I'm wondering instead of upgrading the underlying yocto layers to a more recent branch like Thud which
|
By
greghwang@...
·
#53825
·
|
|
How to create swap partition ?
Hi All,
When I run : (bitbake -e | grep ^WKS_FILE=) I get: Here is the content:
What to add here in order to create a swap partition with size 2G.
Thanks for the help.
Talel
Hi All,
When I run : (bitbake -e | grep ^WKS_FILE=) I get: Here is the content:
What to add here in order to create a swap partition with size 2G.
Thanks for the help.
Talel
|
By
Bel Hadj Salem Talel <bhstalel@...>
·
#53824
·
|
|
Re: ERROR: Task (oe-core/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb:do_install) failed
#yocto
Please, could you try this script!
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/yocto-setup.sh
Thank you,
Zoran
_______
Please, could you try this script!
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/yocto-setup.sh
Thank you,
Zoran
_______
|
By
Zoran
·
#53823
·
|
|
ERROR: Task (oe-core/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_239.bb:do_install) failed
#yocto
I am trying to build Image for AM335x. But getting following error for the command I give - MACHINE=am335x-evm bitbake tisdk-rootfs-image
Request help to resolve
I am trying to build Image for AM335x. But getting following error for the command I give - MACHINE=am335x-evm bitbake tisdk-rootfs-image
Request help to resolve
|
By
shrinivasnh@...
·
#53822
·
|
|
Re: bitbake controlling memory use
Hi Trevor,
Gmane is really messing things up here, sorry about that. I need to create a new thread I'm afraid.
I'd like to your reworked patch.
But note, I reworked it too (but maybe wrongly). I
Hi Trevor,
Gmane is really messing things up here, sorry about that. I need to create a new thread I'm afraid.
I'd like to your reworked patch.
But note, I reworked it too (but maybe wrongly). I
|
By
Ferry Toth
·
#53821
·
|
|
Re: [meta-java] icedtea7 fetching error
I have the tarball. I think we should toss it somewhere safe and update the recipe, as it is unlikely the old mercurial repo is coming back.
Suggestions?
Alex
I have the tarball. I think we should toss it somewhere safe and update the recipe, as it is unlikely the old mercurial repo is coming back.
Suggestions?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#53820
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 1/2] zephyr-kernel: Add OpenThread module to build
Hello.
Rebased on the 2.6 changes now and send a v2 (also with the right meta-zephyr prefix this time).
regards
Stefan Schmidt
Hello.
Rebased on the 2.6 changes now and send a v2 (also with the right meta-zephyr prefix this time).
regards
Stefan Schmidt
|
By
Stefan Schmidt
·
#53819
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH v2 2/2] zephyr-openthread-echo-client: Add new echo-client variant for OpenThread
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@...>
Similar to the normal echo-client example it demonstrates socket usage,
but in this variant we enable the OpenThread config overlay and add the
needed
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@...>
Similar to the normal echo-client example it demonstrates socket usage,
but in this variant we enable the OpenThread config overlay and add the
needed
|
By
Stefan Schmidt
·
#53818
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH v2 1/2] zephyr-kernel: Add OpenThread add module to build
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@...>
OpenThread support in Zephyr is realised as an external module. Make
sure we pull it in and have it available for applications to use
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@...>
OpenThread support in Zephyr is realised as an external module. Make
sure we pull it in and have it available for applications to use
|
By
Stefan Schmidt
·
#53817
·
|
|
Re: bitbake controlling memory use
Op 08-06-2021 om 21:08 schreef Trevor Gamblin:
Sure. But note, I reworked it too (but maybe wrongly). I builds like 90% of my image, but fails building cmake.
Op 08-06-2021 om 21:08 schreef Trevor Gamblin:
Sure. But note, I reworked it too (but maybe wrongly). I builds like 90% of my image, but fails building cmake.
|
By
Gmane Admin
·
#53816
·
|