Hi, Even if we don't have the 2.6.0-rc1 release default (to which I agree), I still think having support for it (as a non default) is beneficial. Especially given that 2.6.0 will be an LTS so people

<nicolas.dechesne@...> wrote: perhaps good time to consider matrix

OFTC is very good, IMO. It's been reliable, well managed, provides a good selection of services, provides a web client for anyone not particularly familiar with IRC clients, and supports SSL + CertFP

Thanks for your email. We are aware, and have started to look into that. It looks like some open source communities have started to move to https://www.oftc.net/ or https://libera.chat/.. If anyone

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dear all, there have been recent reports of a hostile takeover of the freenode service, as described

Add new depends Drop obsolete patches Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- ...AC_CHECK_FILE-when-building-manpages.patch | 34 --------

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-ids/ossec/ossec-hids_3.6.0.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/recipes-ids/ossec/ossec-hids_3.6.0.bb

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git

Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@...> --- config.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/config.py b/config.py index 520de47..2565bd7 100644 ---

Yocto has supported a PREEMPT_RT kernel as long as I can remember. There are recipes for linux-yocto-rt for the kernel itself, and a core-image-rt image recipe right in poky. It's also pretty

Hello Steven, Yocto does support switching kernels and configurations, so yes Yocto does "support" it. However, providing a well-tested PREEMPT_RT kernel might be more an architectural meta layer

From: Wojciech Zmuda <wojciech.zmuda@...> Add support for Nordic Semiconductor nRF52840 Development Kit board. This is a generic MACHINE over nRF52 SoC family config plus PyOCD flashing

From: Wojciech Zmuda <wojciech.zmuda@...> The file is so generic anyway it can be targeted for the nRF52 family without any harm. Signed-off-by: Wojciech Zmuda

From: Wojciech Zmuda <wojciech.zmuda@...> v1 -> v2: - MACHINE configurations are named using '-' instead of '_'. Reame the new configuration accordingly. This patch set adds support for

Hello everybody, thanks for your comments. Let's abandon this patch then. Judging by meta-zephyr commit history we guessed that bumping up the rev to -rc is compliant with your policy. In that case

Recently I heard somewhere that newer versions of the Linux Kernel will include the PREEMPT_RT patches, and configuration settings would be used to set how the Linux would operate in a specific

So far, MACHINE configurations are named using '-' instead of '_' . Could you use change it ? Regards, Naveen

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for May 18, 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == announcements == The upcoming Yocto

Hello, I have created a recipe to call multiple makefile and set a variable if it's not defined inside them, meaning I set it before "oe_runmake". It works as expected on a Debian testing, but with a