|
[layerindex][PATCH 0/4] Various fixes
Various fixes to address errors and warnings when running update.py
The following changes since commit 796d2455bb862ed4c71eadfa9fcf4c002752c2f3:
templates/*: staticfiles -> static (2022-01-13
Various fixes to address errors and warnings when running update.py
The following changes since commit 796d2455bb862ed4c71eadfa9fcf4c002752c2f3:
templates/*: staticfiles -> static (2022-01-13
|
By
Tim Orling
·
#56710
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 6/6] tpm2-pkcs11: update to 1.8.0
The build patches are now included in the upstream,
the local binary checkes can be disabled with --disable-ptool-checks,
the boostrap doesn't need to be called if the release .tar.gz is
The build patches are now included in the upstream,
the local binary checkes can be disabled with --disable-ptool-checks,
the boostrap doesn't need to be called if the release .tar.gz is
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56709
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 5/6] tpm2-tss-engine: fix version string and build with openssl 3.0
Calling autoreconf outside git repo causes the version number to
be null. This patch makes the version number fixed.
Since Yocto now uses OpenSSL 3.0, the file packaging need to
be
Calling autoreconf outside git repo causes the version number to
be null. This patch makes the version number fixed.
Since Yocto now uses OpenSSL 3.0, the file packaging need to
be
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56708
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 4/6] tpm2-abrmd: update to 2.4.1
The version number is correctly assigned only when the release .tar.gz
is used.
Signed-off-by: Petr Gotthard <petr.gotthard@...>
---
.../tpm2-abrmd/{tpm2-abrmd_2.4.0.bb =>
The version number is correctly assigned only when the release .tar.gz
is used.
Signed-off-by: Petr Gotthard <petr.gotthard@...>
---
.../tpm2-abrmd/{tpm2-abrmd_2.4.0.bb =>
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56707
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 3/6] tpm2-tss: update to 3.2.0
This deletes the patches that were unused for a long time,
updates the tpm2-tss package and introduces a fix to the version
number problem that got introduced with the 3.2.0 version.
Signed-off-by:
This deletes the patches that were unused for a long time,
updates the tpm2-tss package and introduces a fix to the version
number problem that got introduced with the 3.2.0 version.
Signed-off-by:
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56706
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 2/6] tpm2-openssl: update to 1.1.0
Also, the recipe is fixed to correctly package the openssl provider.
This new tpm2-openssl:
- Fixed segmentation fault when a signature algorithm is beging initialized
without a private key.
-
Also, the recipe is fixed to correctly package the openssl provider.
This new tpm2-openssl:
- Fixed segmentation fault when a signature algorithm is beging initialized
without a private key.
-
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56705
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 1/6] tpm2-tools: fix missing version number
Calling autoreconf outside git repo causes the version number to
be null. This patch makes the version number fixed.
Signed-off-by: Petr Gotthard <petr.gotthard@...>
---
Calling autoreconf outside git repo causes the version number to
be null. This patch makes the version number fixed.
Signed-off-by: Petr Gotthard <petr.gotthard@...>
---
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56704
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 0/6] upgrade and cleanup tpm2-software
Hello. I'd suggest some "house cleaning" of the tpm2-software. (I am
a member of the tpm2-software community and an upstream developer of
the tpm2-openssl provider.)
In general:
Some tpm2-software
Hello. I'd suggest some "house cleaning" of the tpm2-software. (I am
a member of the tpm2-software community and an upstream developer of
the tpm2-openssl provider.)
In general:
Some tpm2-software
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56703
·
|
|
Re: secure boot w/ Mender bzImage fails validation
#dunfell
Hi Casey,
I've recently had to activate secureboot on some uefi target.
I was trying to use meta-secure-core/meta-efi-secure-boot aft first, but after digging a bit more into meta-intel, I've
Hi Casey,
I've recently had to activate secureboot on some uefi target.
I was trying to use meta-secure-core/meta-efi-secure-boot aft first, but after digging a bit more into meta-intel, I've
|
By
Leo
·
#56702
·
|
|
secure boot w/ Mender bzImage fails validation
#dunfell
Hello,
We have an Intel Elkhart Lake device that we are trying to get Secure Boot (via meta-secure-core/meta-efi-secure-boot SELoader) working on using the Dunfell release. This device uses Mender for
Hello,
We have an Intel Elkhart Lake device that we are trying to get Secure Boot (via meta-secure-core/meta-efi-secure-boot SELoader) working on using the Dunfell release. This device uses Mender for
|
By
Ballentine, Casey
·
#56701
·
|
|
System is booting to "emergency/rescue mode"
Hello All,
This may not be the issue with Yocto itself but rather related to properly booting up Linux on Avenger96(STM32MP1) board. I am currently working on Avenger96 with Yocto(Dunfell). Aim is to
Hello All,
This may not be the issue with Yocto itself but rather related to properly booting up Linux on Avenger96(STM32MP1) board. I am currently working on Avenger96 with Yocto(Dunfell). Aim is to
|
By
Sourabh Hegde
·
#56700
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
Thud has been EOL for a long time. You can see when the support been
added here (end of 2019 it
Thud has been EOL for a long time. You can see when the support been
added here (end of 2019 it
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#56699
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
I am currently on Thud so I am missing the support from what I can
tell to set INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE per image. I have tried to find the
commit that adds that support but am having some problems
I am currently on Thud so I am missing the support from what I can
tell to set INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE per image. I have tried to find the
commit that adds that support but am having some problems
|
By
Mans Zigher <mans.zigher@...>
·
#56698
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
Hi,
My comments are inline.
I am not a lawyer, but I guess you could mention in your manual that you can dish out a non reversible image which was built with a "dummy" key. This would allow the end
Hi,
My comments are inline.
I am not a lawyer, but I guess you could mention in your manual that you can dish out a non reversible image which was built with a "dummy" key. This would allow the end
|
By
Robert Berger
·
#56697
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
Yes I did something similar initially using BBMASK to minimize the
build and in the end requesting them to supply a more minimal build
setup. The end result was not a pure BSP layer because we needed
Yes I did something similar initially using BBMASK to minimize the
build and in the end requesting them to supply a more minimal build
setup. The end result was not a pure BSP layer because we needed
|
By
Mans Zigher <mans.zigher@...>
·
#56696
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
Hi!
To elaborate more on the GPLv3 topic: If you were to use secure boot, signed update images, and all that jazz, how can you make your Firmware GPLv3 compliant? Has *anyone* done it or knows a
Hi!
To elaborate more on the GPLv3 topic: If you were to use secure boot, signed update images, and all that jazz, how can you make your Firmware GPLv3 compliant? Has *anyone* done it or knows a
|
By
Matthias Schoepfer
·
#56695
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
At Daimler, I put my foot down, and forced them to cleanly rewrite the
BSP into an actual BSP layer before we would set up official builds
with it. It took several months, but eventually we got
At Daimler, I put my foot down, and forced them to cleanly rewrite the
BSP into an actual BSP layer before we would set up official builds
with it. It took several months, but eventually we got
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#56694
·
|
|
Re: QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.rc1)
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-4.0.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2.
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-4.0.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2.
|
By
Teoh, Jay Shen
·
#56693
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
Hi,
util-linux is a meta package. Install the needed util-linux utilities separately,
e.g. util-linux-mount, util-linux-umount. Also ptest you can build as distro
feature if you don't install ptest
Hi,
util-linux is a meta package. Install the needed util-linux utilities separately,
e.g. util-linux-mount, util-linux-umount. Also ptest you can build as distro
feature if you don't install ptest
|
By
Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...>
·
#56692
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
Qualcomm is notorious for the poor quality of their layers. Just tell
the management that they created this situation, and they should be
held responsible for delaying whatever product you have to
Qualcomm is notorious for the poor quality of their layers. Just tell
the management that they created this situation, and they should be
held responsible for delaying whatever product you have to
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#56691
·
|