|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH 2/3] IMAGE_FSTYPES: remove ext4
The ext4 IMAGE_FSTYPES does not need to be mentioned explicitly. It will be
automatically generated in cases where it is needed.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...>
---
The ext4 IMAGE_FSTYPES does not need to be mentioned explicitly. It will be
automatically generated in cases where it is needed.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...>
---
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53994
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH 1/3] conf/machine/include/nanopi-m4.inc: add full include path
Specify the full include path to the rk3399.inc file.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...>
---
conf/machine/include/nanopi-m4.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Specify the full include path to the rk3399.inc file.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...>
---
conf/machine/include/nanopi-m4.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53993
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] conf/machine/include/rockchip-wic.inc: create
Applied to meta-rockchip master.
Applied to meta-rockchip master.
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53992
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] Hardknott (GCC10) Compiler Issues
Even better, the rootfs built by YOCTO could be used, but anyone can
build U-Boot and kernel outside of the YOCTO, using their own cross
compilers (I use Fedora 33 ARM cross compilers, since my Linux
Even better, the rootfs built by YOCTO could be used, but anyone can
build U-Boot and kernel outside of the YOCTO, using their own cross
compilers (I use Fedora 33 ARM cross compilers, since my Linux
|
By
Zoran
·
#53991
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] Hardknott (GCC10) Compiler Issues
At least seems that GCC 10.2 is not the cause of the problem for my
cannelloni recipe issue:
https://github.com/mguentner/cannelloni/issues/35
The same error repeats itself with GCC 11.2 (in
At least seems that GCC 10.2 is not the cause of the problem for my
cannelloni recipe issue:
https://github.com/mguentner/cannelloni/issues/35
The same error repeats itself with GCC 11.2 (in
|
By
Zoran
·
#53990
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] Hardknott (GCC10) Compiler Issues
The issue you describe does sound strange. I was a little unclear about exactly
which combinations were passing/failing. Are you saying that some versions of
buildtools let the system work but some
The issue you describe does sound strange. I was a little unclear about exactly
which combinations were passing/failing. Are you saying that some versions of
buildtools let the system work but some
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#53989
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.9.rc1)
Hello all,
This is the full report for yocto-3.1.9.rc1:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults
======= Summary ========
No high
Hello all,
This is the full report for yocto-3.1.9.rc1:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults
======= Summary ========
No high
|
By
Sangeeta Jain
·
#53988
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 4/4] initramfs-framework: rename files dir
Fixes:
ERROR: initramfs-framework-1.0-r4 do_fetch: Fetcher failure for URL: 'file://dmverity'. Unable to fetch URL from any source.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
Fixes:
ERROR: initramfs-framework-1.0-r4 do_fetch: Fetcher failure for URL: 'file://dmverity'. Unable to fetch URL from any source.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#53987
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 3/4] packagegroup-core-security: add sshguard
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#53986
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 2/4] ssshgaurd: add packaage
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-security/sshguard/sshguard_2.4.2.bb | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-security/sshguard/sshguard_2.4.2.bb | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#53985
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 1/4] initramfs-framework: fix typo in conditional
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-framework_1.0.bbappend | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-framework_1.0.bbappend | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#53984
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v2] console cleanup
Applied to meta-rockchip master.
Applied to meta-rockchip master.
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53983
·
|
|
Re: what's the state of things with pushing the bounds on ASSUME_PROVIDED?
Very strong agreement here. My 2c is that Yocto/OE should be going in that direction even
further. One of the significant benefits of the OE build method is eliminating, to the greatest
extent
Very strong agreement here. My 2c is that Yocto/OE should be going in that direction even
further. One of the significant benefits of the OE build method is eliminating, to the greatest
extent
|
By
Chuck Wolber
·
#53982
·
|
|
Re: Recipe for include-what-you-use and rpath problem
#sdk
this is fine, if you are interested submit it as a patch to include in metadata in meta-python
this is fine, if you are interested submit it as a patch to include in metadata in meta-python
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53981
·
|
|
Re: Hardknott (GCC10) Compiler Issues
Basically, do NOT use this instruction anywhere. It clearly does NOT work?!
I did replace the whole gcc/ in the: poky/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc
for hardknott branch:
Now I have a gcc_11.1 compiler
Basically, do NOT use this instruction anywhere. It clearly does NOT work?!
I did replace the whole gcc/ in the: poky/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc
for hardknott branch:
Now I have a gcc_11.1 compiler
|
By
Zoran
·
#53980
·
|
|
Re: Recipe for include-what-you-use and rpath problem
#sdk
I was able to make it work correctly enabling CMAKE_SKIP_RPATH.
Here the working full recipe:LICENSE = "NCSA"LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE.TXT;md5=59d01ad98720f3c50d6a8a0ef3108c88 \
I was able to make it work correctly enabling CMAKE_SKIP_RPATH.
Here the working full recipe:LICENSE = "NCSA"LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE.TXT;md5=59d01ad98720f3c50d6a8a0ef3108c88 \
|
By
Francesco Cusolito
·
#53979
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH] conf/machine/include/rockchip-wic.inc: create
Create a conf/machine/include/rockchip-wic.inc file to contain all the common
wic/wks things for easy inclusion by any MACHINEs that use wic for their image
creation.
NOTE: the wic image type of
Create a conf/machine/include/rockchip-wic.inc file to contain all the common
wic/wks things for easy inclusion by any MACHINEs that use wic for their image
creation.
NOTE: the wic image type of
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#53978
·
|
|
Re: The do_populate_sdk is finishing OK even when there are errors present in the build
Hi Richard!
Ok, I'll prepare a patch, do more tests on my side and if everything works I'll send the patch to the OE-core list.
Is there any specific test, or just populate_sdk with
Hi Richard!
Ok, I'll prepare a patch, do more tests on my side and if everything works I'll send the patch to the OE-core list.
Is there any specific test, or just populate_sdk with
|
By
Fabio Berton
·
#53977
·
|
|
Re: The do_populate_sdk is finishing OK even when there are errors present in the build
It would probably be worth an experiment to see if we really do need the
attempt_only option set there any more. I'd hope it isn't needed now...
It is probably worth testing a patch on the
It would probably be worth an experiment to see if we really do need the
attempt_only option set there any more. I'd hope it isn't needed now...
It is probably worth testing a patch on the
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#53976
·
|
|
Re: what's the state of things with pushing the bounds on ASSUME_PROVIDED?
Quite often things aren't as simple as they first seem:
Elfutils has a history of interesting changes between versions so having
our builds use a consistent version is good.
Some recipes build
Quite often things aren't as simple as they first seem:
Elfutils has a history of interesting changes between versions so having
our builds use a consistent version is good.
Some recipes build
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#53975
·
|