The rock64 has an ARM Mali 450 MP2 GPU, therefore enable mesa's lima for accelerated, open-source graphics. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> ---

It looks like we'll need to do an rc2 build to pick up a patch for meta-yocto. Thanks to Denys for noticing the issue! For details

A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.1.11.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at: https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.1.11.rc1 Build hash information: bitbake:

there is core-image-x11 which will be bareminimal and core-image-weston if you want to use wayland/weston based desktop. if you like XFCE for desktop then close meta-openembedded and add meta-oe and

merged thanks

Hello all, This is the full report for yocto-3.3.3.rc2: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults ======= Summary ======== No high

Dear Team, I need to build Rpi3 image with yocto which includes Desktop, so how can build the image with desktop feature, so that I can use it for browsing purpose after installing one of the

I see, are you talking about ${MLPREFIX} variable? The target itself compiles fine, all are 32-bit binaries in userspace. I have this issue only for SDK.

you should check the dependencies and ensure they are multilib safe sometimes dependencies could be hardcodes and cross the multilib boundaries accidentally >

The packages that SDK is trying to build are userspace packages and they haven't been ported for 64-bit. There are quite a few of them and short of fixing 64-bit compile issues for all of them, I am

I think since kernel is 64bit it might be building some tools and packages to support kernel builds. Is there a specific need to not build 64bit userspace completely ? > >

Bumping this question... Is there a way for me to disable building of 64-bit packages when building SDK with a multilib config? I have no use for 64-bit userspace package artifacts.

I have a python package hosted in an internal git repo that is currently configured to use Poetry and as such does not have a setup.py file. Yocto appears to expect a setup.py file (via inherit

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-2-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-security/isic/isic_0.07.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-3-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-scanners/checksec/checksec_2.4.0.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-2-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-security/opendnssec/opendnssec_2.1.9.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-2-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmswtpm2/ibmswtpm2_1661.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-2-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmtpm2tss/ibmtpm2tss_1.6.0.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

"BSD" is ambiguous, use the precise licenses BSD-3-Clause Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/trousers/trousers_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),

Current Dev Position: YP 3.4 M4 Next Deadline: 4th Oct. 2021 YP 3.4 M4 build Next Team Meetings: Bug Triage meeting Thursday Sept. 16th at 7:30am PDT