|
Re: Cannot build yocto anymore after updating all layers to current dunfell branch tips
https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/blob/dunfell/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf#L34
says it works with dunfell releases and depends on core and meta-python layers. So I wonder what
https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/blob/dunfell/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf#L34
says it works with dunfell releases and depends on core and meta-python layers. So I wonder what
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54404
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper 1/2] auh-config: enable systemd only for glibc
Please report the problems to mailing list and we can try to help if they do not work with musl. We do support systemd/musl combination and try to keep it working
this will limit testing this
Please report the problems to mailing list and we can try to help if they do not work with musl. We do support systemd/musl combination and try to keep it working
this will limit testing this
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54403
·
|
|
Re: Cannot build yocto anymore after updating all layers to current dunfell branch tips
We've all done this sort of thing :-)
Looks like another case of the layer's master/honister branch instead
of dunfell.
Steve
We've all done this sort of thing :-)
Looks like another case of the layer's master/honister branch instead
of dunfell.
Steve
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#54402
·
|
|
Re: Cannot build yocto anymore after updating all layers to current dunfell branch tips
Am Fr, 13. Aug 2021, um 23:59, schrieb Steve Sakoman:
I feel like an idiot right now. Thank you! With dunfell it builds indeed.
Now I have to deal with the following:
```
ERROR: Layer
Am Fr, 13. Aug 2021, um 23:59, schrieb Steve Sakoman:
I feel like an idiot right now. Thank you! With dunfell it builds indeed.
Now I have to deal with the following:
```
ERROR: Layer
|
By
Manuel Wagesreither
·
#54401
·
|
|
Re: Cannot build yocto anymore after updating all layers to current dunfell branch tips
There was an OVERRIDE syntax change and this is what are seeing.
Some layers, like meta-openembedded incorporated this change into their master branch. So either you need to update all your layers as
There was an OVERRIDE syntax change and this is what are seeing.
Some layers, like meta-openembedded incorporated this change into their master branch. So either you need to update all your layers as
|
By
Robert Berger
·
#54400
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper 2/2] auh-config: adjust to new override syntax
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
scripts/auh-config/local.conf.append | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
scripts/auh-config/local.conf.append | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#54399
·
|
|
[PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper 1/2] auh-config: enable systemd only for glibc
It is not guaranteed to build or work otherwise, and causes
update failures in unrelated recipes when building for musl for instance.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
It is not guaranteed to build or work otherwise, and causes
update failures in unrelated recipes when building for musl for instance.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
---
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#54398
·
|
|
Re: Cannot build yocto anymore after updating all layers to current dunfell branch tips
Note that you are using the master branch of meta-oe ^^^^^^^^
If you use the dunfell branch you won't have this issue.
Steve
Note that you are using the master branch of meta-oe ^^^^^^^^
If you use the dunfell branch you won't have this issue.
Steve
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#54397
·
|
|
best way to get feature of systemd v248 in yocto-hardknott (systemd v247)?
I'd like to use a systemd DHCP client feature that became available in v248 in my yocto-hardknott system. Is there any hope of using the complete v249.1 recipe from the oe master branch?
Bill
I'd like to use a systemd DHCP client feature that became available in v248 in my yocto-hardknott system. Is there any hope of using the complete v249.1 recipe from the oe master branch?
Bill
|
By
Bill Plunkett
·
#54396
·
|
|
Cannot build yocto anymore after updating all layers to current dunfell branch tips
Hello all,
I updated the layers of my project to the current dunfell branch tips. See here: https://gitlab.com/manuel_wagesreither/bora-proj/-/commit/de631634d7556987d2551d0cedca8f67530bc78d
Since
Hello all,
I updated the layers of my project to the current dunfell branch tips. See here: https://gitlab.com/manuel_wagesreither/bora-proj/-/commit/de631634d7556987d2551d0cedca8f67530bc78d
Since
|
By
Manuel Wagesreither
·
#54395
·
|
|
[yocto-autobuilder2] schedulers.py: add dunfell branchdefaults for meta-aws and meta-openembedded
Both repos have been added to check-layer-nightly so we need to make
sure the dunfell branches of the repos are being used
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@...>
---
schedulers.py | 2 ++
Both repos have been added to check-layer-nightly so we need to make
sure the dunfell branches of the repos are being used
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@...>
---
schedulers.py | 2 ++
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#54394
·
|
|
Re: Dependencies between recipes
Hi Daniel,
Those commands only add directories, you still need to copy your files to one of those directories. Use for example:
install ${S}/path/to/lib.so.x.y ${D}${libdir}
Any specific reason for
Hi Daniel,
Those commands only add directories, you still need to copy your files to one of those directories. Use for example:
install ${S}/path/to/lib.so.x.y ${D}${libdir}
Any specific reason for
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#54393
·
|
|
[PATCH][yocto-autobuilder2] schedulers: change default value for SWAT monitoring
meta-oe and auh are not for SWAT, change the default to be false
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...>
---
schedulers.py | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1
meta-oe and auh are not for SWAT, change the default to be false
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...>
---
schedulers.py | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#54392
·
|
|
Re: [meta-mingw] [PATCH] binutils: Package static libdep linker plugins
Hmm, I'm not sure why I missed this. However, why is the MinGW build producing the .a files and not all the builds? It seems like this could go in the oe-core version of the recipe (w/o the
Hmm, I'm not sure why I missed this. However, why is the MinGW build producing the .a files and not all the builds? It seems like this could go in the oe-core version of the recipe (w/o the
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#54391
·
|
|
Re: Unable to add gdbserver to the Yocto build
#yocto
Thud has not been supported for a very long time actually. To really find out what is happening, it would help if you make an archive of tmp/work/../gdb/ and put it somewhere for inspection.
Alex
Thud has not been supported for a very long time actually. To really find out what is happening, it would help if you make an archive of tmp/work/../gdb/ and put it somewhere for inspection.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#54390
·
|
|
Re: Unable to add gdbserver to the Yocto build
#yocto
Hi Alexander and KhemRaj,
I am using the Yocto "thud" version which has long term support.
The architecture used is aarch64-oe-linux
The gdb directory or executables were not created in
Hi Alexander and KhemRaj,
I am using the Yocto "thud" version which has long term support.
The architecture used is aarch64-oe-linux
The gdb directory or executables were not created in
|
By
Ashutosh Naik
·
#54389
·
|
|
execute a python code in raspberrypi
#python
Hello beautiful people,
I successfully executed helloworld.py on the raspberrypi by making a layer. BUt now i need to add a whole python code with classes etc, which exists in different files like
Hello beautiful people,
I successfully executed helloworld.py on the raspberrypi by making a layer. BUt now i need to add a whole python code with classes etc, which exists in different files like
|
By
yasminebenghozzi6@...
·
#54388
·
|
|
Re: [meta-mingw] [PATCH] binutils: Package static libdep linker plugins
ping.
I'm still seeing problem with this on hardknott, at least when building for qemux86 target:
agent:2021/08/13 06:00:50 build.go:391: ERROR: binutils-cross-canadian-i686-2.36.1-r0 do_package_qa:
ping.
I'm still seeing problem with this on hardknott, at least when building for qemux86 target:
agent:2021/08/13 06:00:50 build.go:391: ERROR: binutils-cross-canadian-i686-2.36.1-r0 do_package_qa:
|
By
Samuli Piippo
·
#54387
·
|
|
Re: Unable to add gdbserver to the Yocto build
#yocto
whats your target architecture ? sometimes gdbserver port may not be available for a given arch.
whats your target architecture ? sometimes gdbserver port may not be available for a given arch.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54386
·
|
|
Dependencies between recipes
Hello,
I'm stucking a little bit by compiling a cmake application which has dependencies
on libs from another recipe.
1)
The recipe which provided my libs is a normal debian package which I
Hello,
I'm stucking a little bit by compiling a cmake application which has dependencies
on libs from another recipe.
1)
The recipe which provided my libs is a normal debian package which I
|
By
daniel_herrmann22@...
·
#54385
·
|