|
Re: Weird bitbake generation behavior
Google shows:
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/176924/
so I'd check the glog
Google shows:
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/176924/
so I'd check the glog
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#54473
·
|
|
Build multiple drivers wit one recipe
#kernel
#linux
I am developing a pair of driver modules that share some functionality. Thus it would be convenient for the source files of the drivers to share a directory with the source files of the shared
I am developing a pair of driver modules that share some functionality. Thus it would be convenient for the source files of the drivers to share a directory with the source files of the shared
|
By
davidgnisbet@...
·
#54472
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 2/2] image-with-hardened-binaries: Add selftest
Add selftest that executes binary analysis on small rootfs
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Blenk <Maximilian.Blenk@...>
---
.../cases/hardened_binaries_checker.py | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
1
Add selftest that executes binary analysis on small rootfs
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Blenk <Maximilian.Blenk@...>
---
.../cases/hardened_binaries_checker.py | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
1
|
By
Maximilian Blenk <Maximilian.Blenk@...>
·
#54471
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 1/2] image-with-hardened-binaries: add class
Add class to analyze binaries with checksec.py. checksec.py is a tool
that checks if security features of a compiler have been used. To do
so, it analyses the resulting binaries:
* NX Proctection is
Add class to analyze binaries with checksec.py. checksec.py is a tool
that checks if security features of a compiler have been used. To do
so, it analyses the resulting binaries:
* NX Proctection is
|
By
Maximilian Blenk <Maximilian.Blenk@...>
·
#54470
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/2] image-with-hardened-binaries: Add selftest
Hi guys,
we are currenlty working on adding automatically checking the binaries we put into an image for the presence of certain recommended compiler features. To achieve this, we created a bbclass
Hi guys,
we are currenlty working on adding automatically checking the binaries we put into an image for the presence of certain recommended compiler features. To achieve this, we created a bbclass
|
By
Maximilian Blenk <Maximilian.Blenk@...>
·
#54469
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/2] image-with-hardened-binaries: add class
Add class to analyze binaries with checksec.py. checksec.py is a tool
that checks if security features of a compiler have been used. To do
so, it analyses the resulting binaries:
* NX Proctection is
Add class to analyze binaries with checksec.py. checksec.py is a tool
that checks if security features of a compiler have been used. To do
so, it analyses the resulting binaries:
* NX Proctection is
|
By
Maximilian Blenk <Maximilian.Blenk@...>
·
#54468
·
|
|
[PATCH 2/2] image-with-hardened-binaries: Add selftest
Add selftest that executes binary analysis on small rootfs
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Blenk <Maximilian.Blenk@...>
---
.../cases/hardened_binaries_checker.py | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
1
Add selftest that executes binary analysis on small rootfs
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Blenk <Maximilian.Blenk@...>
---
.../cases/hardened_binaries_checker.py | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
1
|
By
Maximilian Blenk <Maximilian.Blenk@...>
·
#54467
·
|
|
Weird bitbake generation behavior
Hi,
I share an sstate-cache with my fellow developers and I was assessing why sometimes things got rebuild even though I did not expect this.
One of the things I discovered was that we had two
Hi,
I share an sstate-cache with my fellow developers and I was assessing why sometimes things got rebuild even though I did not expect this.
One of the things I discovered was that we had two
|
By
Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbroeks@...>
·
#54466
·
|
|
creating tarball for storing downloads; issue inheriting own-mirrors.bbclass
Hello,
I am trying to create tarballs to store yocto downloads. This is primarily to avoid old commits breaking when some random git repository changes their master branch name or something like
Hello,
I am trying to create tarballs to store yocto downloads. This is primarily to avoid old commits breaking when some random git repository changes their master branch name or something like
|
By
scott.threet@...
·
#54465
·
|
|
Re: multilib32: libtool-cross_2.4.6.bb configure failure
Hi,
Any help on this topic would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Nir.
Hi,
Any help on this topic would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Nir.
|
By
Geller, Nir
·
#54464
·
|
|
Re: Getting bitbake error after 54% recipes are baked.
#yocto
#dunfell
This should be reflected somewhere in YOCTO documentation. Especially
for chromium.
In the section: Host HW Requirements (with some explanation why).
Zee
_______
This should be reflected somewhere in YOCTO documentation. Especially
for chromium.
In the section: Host HW Requirements (with some explanation why).
Zee
_______
|
By
Zoran
·
#54463
·
|
|
Re: ZFS/ZoL on Yocto
I'm guessing that ZFS is not really popular on embedded systems ;)
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
I'm guessing that ZFS is not really popular on embedded systems ;)
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#54462
·
|
|
Re: Getting bitbake error after 54% recipes are baked.
#yocto
#dunfell
keep in mind that based upon how many vcores you allocate to VM will
determine memory pressure
as well. So if you have 2 cores perhaps 4GB is ok or maybe even 4
cores might workout ok but some bigger
keep in mind that based upon how many vcores you allocate to VM will
determine memory pressure
as well. So if you have 2 cores perhaps 4GB is ok or maybe even 4
cores might workout ok but some bigger
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54461
·
|
|
Re: [meta-mingw] [PATCH v3 1/5] protobuf: static link tools when generating sdk
ah, mine is both arm and arm64. No need to touch the recipe then.
ah, mine is both arm and arm64. No need to touch the recipe then.
|
By
Sinan Kaya
·
#54460
·
|
|
Re: [meta-mingw] [PATCH v3 1/5] protobuf: static link tools when generating sdk
RIght, the "mingw32" override shouldn't affect what you do with the *target* unless your target is MinGW; I'm not sure if anyone is actually doing that, most SDKs target Linux for ARM, Linux for
RIght, the "mingw32" override shouldn't affect what you do with the *target* unless your target is MinGW; I'm not sure if anyone is actually doing that, most SDKs target Linux for ARM, Linux for
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#54459
·
|
|
Re: [meta-mingw] [PATCH v3 1/5] protobuf: static link tools when generating sdk
I see two classes of problems based on my engagement with the mingw32.
Some recipes just don't build without using the static method for
the SDK and the target both. (abseil-cpp is one of them)
The
I see two classes of problems based on my engagement with the mingw32.
Some recipes just don't build without using the static method for
the SDK and the target both. (abseil-cpp is one of them)
The
|
By
Sinan Kaya
·
#54458
·
|
|
Re: [meta-mingw] [PATCH v3 1/5] protobuf: static link tools when generating sdk
Are you building with "mingw32" as the target (not as the SDK), and it works there? I wonder why it only fails for the SDK build and not the target build? If that is truly the case, then yes I suppose
Are you building with "mingw32" as the target (not as the SDK), and it works there? I wonder why it only fails for the SDK build and not the target build? If that is truly the case, then yes I suppose
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#54457
·
|
|
Re: Getting bitbake error after 54% recipes are baked.
#yocto
#dunfell
Previously SDRAM was 3 GB allocated.
After changing SDRAM to 4 GB.
then trying to build/make/bitbake..
getting new error i.e.
Unable to connect to bitbake server
Previously SDRAM was 3 GB allocated.
After changing SDRAM to 4 GB.
then trying to build/make/bitbake..
getting new error i.e.
Unable to connect to bitbake server
|
By
vishal.rana118@...
·
#54456
·
|
|
Re: Getting bitbake error after 54% recipes are baked.
#yocto
#dunfell
how much DRAM is allocated.
how much DRAM is allocated.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54455
·
|
|
Re: Getting bitbake error after 54% recipes are baked.
#yocto
#dunfell
> /home/vrana/Desktop/yocto_Practice/build/tmp/ \
> work/core2-64-poky-linux/gcc/9.3.0-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/ \
> usr/bin/x86_64-poky-linux/../../libexec/x86_64-poky-linux/ \
>
> /home/vrana/Desktop/yocto_Practice/build/tmp/ \
> work/core2-64-poky-linux/gcc/9.3.0-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/ \
> usr/bin/x86_64-poky-linux/../../libexec/x86_64-poky-linux/ \
>
|
By
Zoran
·
#54454
·
|