|
[yocto-autobuilder2] [PATCH] builders: Fix quarantine handling
The way the canStartBuild code was written, it inserted a delay between
each build starting of 2 minutes unconditionally. We only want to do this
if the worker had run out of space so tweak the code
The way the canStartBuild code was written, it inserted a delay between
each build starting of 2 minutes unconditionally. We only want to do this
if the worker had run out of space so tweak the code
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#55194
·
|
|
Re: [yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] builders.py: subtract builder weight instead of add
This didn't work (and wasn't merged) although I still think it is probably the
correct thing to do with that code.
I did some digging and the issue is that when we trigger builds, it triggers
them
This didn't work (and wasn't merged) although I still think it is probably the
correct thing to do with that code.
I did some digging and the issue is that when we trigger builds, it triggers
them
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#55193
·
|
|
Re: [yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] builders.py: Add canStartBuild disk space check
Unfortunately this quarantine piece is causing problems. It means that even if
there is free space on the builder and always was, a maximum of one build every
2 minutes can be started.
I'll probably
Unfortunately this quarantine piece is causing problems. It means that even if
there is free space on the builder and always was, a maximum of one build every
2 minutes can be started.
I'll probably
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#55192
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] tpm2-pkcs11: update to 1.7.0
drop patch now included.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../recipes-tpm2/tpm2-pkcs11/files/677.patch | 295 ------------------
...2-pkcs11_1.6.0.bb => tpm2-pkcs11_1.7.0.bb}
drop patch now included.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../recipes-tpm2/tpm2-pkcs11/files/677.patch | 295 ------------------
...2-pkcs11_1.6.0.bb => tpm2-pkcs11_1.7.0.bb}
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#55191
·
|
|
Re: How to set IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE ?
Hello,
Copying the docs@ mailing list.
All things considered, the documentation for some other parameters
explains where they can typically be set. This should definitely help
people just quickly
Hello,
Copying the docs@ mailing list.
All things considered, the documentation for some other parameters
explains where they can typically be set. This should definitely help
people just quickly
|
By
Michael Opdenacker
·
#55190
·
|
|
Re: How to set IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE ?
Hello Simone,
You can define it either in your image recipe (if you have a custom
one), or in conf/local.conf.
True, but this is a more generic mechanism that we chose not to repeat
for each
Hello Simone,
You can define it either in your image recipe (if you have a custom
one), or in conf/local.conf.
True, but this is a more generic mechanism that we chose not to repeat
for each
|
By
Michael Opdenacker
·
#55189
·
|
|
[yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] builders.py: subtract builder weight instead of add
Signed-off-by: Trevor Gamblin <trevor.gamblin@...>
---
builders.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builders.py b/builders.py
index f94d1dd..fc92e36
Signed-off-by: Trevor Gamblin <trevor.gamblin@...>
---
builders.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builders.py b/builders.py
index f94d1dd..fc92e36
|
By
Trevor Gamblin
·
#55188
·
|
|
Re: Minutes: Yocto Project Weekly Triage Meeting 10/28/2021
I added some comments.
Cheers,
Richard
I added some comments.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#55187
·
|
|
[yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] builders.py: fix bonus time calculation
Modify the builder_bonuses calculation so that it provides variable
bonus time based on the builder, rather than a constant value.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Gamblin <trevor.gamblin@...>
---
Modify the builder_bonuses calculation so that it provides variable
bonus time based on the builder, rather than a constant value.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Gamblin <trevor.gamblin@...>
---
|
By
Trevor Gamblin
·
#55186
·
|
|
Looking for advices on bug 14375
#systemd
Hi,
I'm looking for advice on https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14375
Seems like an easy fix but not sure how I should handle it. I'm willing to put in the effort, just need some
Hi,
I'm looking for advice on https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14375
Seems like an easy fix but not sure how I should handle it. I'm willing to put in the effort, just need some
|
By
Marc Ferland
·
#55185
·
|
|
[yocto-autobuilder2][PATCH] builders.py: Add canStartBuild disk space check
We need a way to limit the builds for when a given worker has less than
a certain amount of disk space available. This implements a
canStartBuild method based on the example in the Buildbot docs
We need a way to limit the builds for when a given worker has less than
a certain amount of disk space available. This implements a
canStartBuild method based on the example in the Buildbot docs
|
By
Trevor Gamblin
·
#55184
·
|
|
How to set IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE ?
Hello,
I am trying to set a default size for the rootfs.jffs2 generated by Yocto.
For this purpose, if I am not wrong, this can be done using the IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE option.
But where I have to
Hello,
I am trying to set a default size for the rootfs.jffs2 generated by Yocto.
For this purpose, if I am not wrong, this can be done using the IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE option.
But where I have to
|
By
sazzalin@...
·
#55183
·
|
|
[yocto-autobuilder2][dunfell 1/1] config.py: debian 11 should have been enabled in dunfell, not warrior, fix it
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@...>
---
config.py | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.py b/config.py
index 3874f04..58418a7 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@...>
---
config.py | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.py b/config.py
index 3874f04..58418a7 100644
---
|
By
Steve Sakoman
·
#55182
·
|
|
Re: Dunfell: problem with kernel-module install and libkmod.so
"Patrick Boettcher" <patrick.boettcher@...> wrote:
It was a problem of DDR memory configuration and calibration.
Hard to track, but once you know it, easy to find and fix.
--
Patrick.
"Patrick Boettcher" <patrick.boettcher@...> wrote:
It was a problem of DDR memory configuration and calibration.
Hard to track, but once you know it, easy to find and fix.
--
Patrick.
|
By
Patrick Boettcher
·
#55181
·
|
|
Minutes: Yocto Project Weekly Triage Meeting 10/28/2021
Wiki: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage
Attendees: Alexandre, Anuj, Armin, Joshua, Kiran, Randy, Richard, Saul, Stephen, Steve, Tim, Trevor
ARs:
-
Wiki: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage
Attendees: Alexandre, Anuj, Armin, Joshua, Kiran, Randy, Richard, Saul, Stephen, Steve, Tim, Trevor
ARs:
-
|
By
Trevor Gamblin
·
#55180
·
|
|
Re: [Automated-testing] BusyBox pTest failure
It’s also good to post your build configuration that bitbake prints at the beginning of build this could also be other policies like default libc being musl vs glibc is in play etc
It’s also good to post your build configuration that bitbake prints at the beginning of build this could also be other policies like default libc being musl vs glibc is in play etc
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#55179
·
|
|
Re: [Automated-testing] BusyBox pTest failure
The shell the test is run under could make a difference, it is probably supposed
to be running under busybox's own sh. I think we put the busybox utils into PATH
in the ptest to try and ensure this is
The shell the test is run under could make a difference, it is probably supposed
to be running under busybox's own sh. I think we put the busybox utils into PATH
in the ptest to try and ensure this is
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#55178
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][dunfell][PATCH 3/3] libselinux: Fix restorecon_set_sehandle.patch context
0001-Fix-NULL-pointer-use-in-selinux_restorecon_set_sehandle.patch added
in commit d6ff5a0e67af "libselinux: Backport NULL pointer fix from 3.1"
fails to apply because there is a extra level in the
0001-Fix-NULL-pointer-use-in-selinux_restorecon_set_sehandle.patch added
in commit d6ff5a0e67af "libselinux: Backport NULL pointer fix from 3.1"
fails to apply because there is a extra level in the
|
By
Jason Andryuk
·
#55177
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][dunfell][PATCH 2/3] Remove e2fsprogs override
commit b2b3ea27e3e3 "e2fsprogs: Superseded by upstream." removed
lib-ext2fs-ext2_ext_attr.h-add-xattr-index.patch from SRC_URI. It was
no longer applied, but the file was not deleted. Do that
commit b2b3ea27e3e3 "e2fsprogs: Superseded by upstream." removed
lib-ext2fs-ext2_ext_attr.h-add-xattr-index.patch from SRC_URI. It was
no longer applied, but the file was not deleted. Do that
|
By
Jason Andryuk
·
#55176
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][dunfell][PATCH 1/3] e2fsprogs: Remove misc_create_inode.c-label_rootfs.patch
An equivalent patch was merged into 1.45.7: commit 7616fd6a599e
"create_inode: set xattrs to the root directory as well". The existing
one still applies and actualy breaks building because of
An equivalent patch was merged into 1.45.7: commit 7616fd6a599e
"create_inode: set xattrs to the root directory as well". The existing
one still applies and actualy breaks building because of
|
By
Jason Andryuk
·
#55175
·
|