|
Enhancements/Bugs closed WW40!
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
richard.purdie@...
2
mhalstead@...
1
ross@...
1
Grand Total
4
Thanks,
Stephen K.
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
richard.purdie@...
2
mhalstead@...
1
ross@...
1
Grand Total
4
Thanks,
Stephen K.
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#55023
·
|
|
Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 3.4
All,
Below is the list as of top 50 bug owners as of the end of WW41 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.4. There are 13 possible work days left until the final
All,
Below is the list as of top 50 bug owners as of the end of WW41 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.4. There are 13 possible work days left until the final
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#55022
·
|
|
Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#55021
·
|
|
building the kernel's usbipd daemon
Hi all,
I've googled most of the day, but to no avail. How does one compile and add to the image the daemon usbipd? Is there a bitbake file already for this? The code is part of the kernel found in
Hi all,
I've googled most of the day, but to no avail. How does one compile and add to the image the daemon usbipd? Is there a bitbake file already for this? The code is part of the kernel found in
|
By
chuck kamas
·
#55020
·
|
|
Re: Yocto build error
So it seems your makefile is not respecting the LDFLAGS coming from
the environment during linking.
perhaps you should fix that in your linking rules. hardcoding hash
style like this is not
So it seems your makefile is not respecting the LDFLAGS coming from
the environment during linking.
perhaps you should fix that in your linking rules. hardcoding hash
style like this is not
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#55019
·
|
|
QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.4.rc1)
A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.4.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.4.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.4.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.4.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#55018
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH 2/2] zephyr-kernel/2.5.0: drop recipe
As v2.7.0 is being added, drop this version support
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
...phyr-2.5.0-cmake-add-yocto-toolchain.patch | 63 -------------------
As v2.7.0 is being added, drop this version support
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
...phyr-2.5.0-cmake-add-yocto-toolchain.patch | 63 -------------------
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#55017
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/2] zephyr-kernel/2.7.0: add recipe
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commits/v2.7-branch
Keeping the default PREFERRED_VERSION to 2.6.1 for now.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commits/v2.7-branch
Keeping the default PREFERRED_VERSION to 2.6.1 for now.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#55016
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] How to trigger Yocto Linux /etc/profile or shell scripts in /etc/profile.d without shell logging in?
Hi Federico,
Thanks for your response.
Understood, here is what I try to figure out. I use several systemd
services to start my tasks, each task is not just a system process, I
found it also has a
Hi Federico,
Thanks for your response.
Understood, here is what I try to figure out. I use several systemd
services to start my tasks, each task is not just a system process, I
found it also has a
|
By
JH
·
#55015
·
|
|
Re: Yocto build error
You need to show the full command line that produces the error.
Alex
You need to show the full command line that produces the error.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#55014
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] How to trigger Yocto Linux /etc/profile or shell scripts in /etc/profile.d without shell logging in?
Hi Jupiter,
/etc/profile and similar are interactive shell (/bash) concepts, not really system startup ones. So indeed: just on a login (be it local, ssh and so on) they are executed.
If you want to
Hi Jupiter,
/etc/profile and similar are interactive shell (/bash) concepts, not really system startup ones. So indeed: just on a login (be it local, ssh and so on) they are executed.
If you want to
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
·
#55013
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] How to trigger Yocto Linux /etc/profile or shell scripts in /etc/profile.d without shell logging in?
What problem are you attempting to solve by running a script from /etc/profile.d?
..Ch:W..
--
"Perfection must be reached by degrees; she requires the slow hand of time." - Voltaire
What problem are you attempting to solve by running a script from /etc/profile.d?
..Ch:W..
--
"Perfection must be reached by degrees; she requires the slow hand of time." - Voltaire
|
By
Chuck Wolber
·
#55012
·
|
|
How to trigger Yocto Linux /etc/profile or shell scripts in /etc/profile.d without shell logging in?
Hi,
The Yocto uses /etc/profile for root login, but there is no root
physical login in an embedded device so the /etc/profile is never
called, I added a shell script to /etc/profile.d, it was not
Hi,
The Yocto uses /etc/profile for root login, but there is no root
physical login in an embedded device so the /etc/profile is never
called, I added a shell script to /etc/profile.d, it was not
|
By
JH
·
#55011
·
|
|
Yocto build error
Hi,
I have following errors:
No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary
/build/tmp-glibc/work/cortexa7t2hf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/solar/1.0.0-0/packages-split/wifi_signal,
didn't pass LDFLAGS? [ldflags]
So I add
Hi,
I have following errors:
No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary
/build/tmp-glibc/work/cortexa7t2hf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/solar/1.0.0-0/packages-split/wifi_signal,
didn't pass LDFLAGS? [ldflags]
So I add
|
By
JH
·
#55010
·
|
|
Re: LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION has no effect
#dunfell
#yocto
#kernel
Bruce,
It's an honor to get help from the author himself!
I'm starting to understand why they have this:
do_configure_prepend() {
cp "${S}/arch/${ARCH}/configs/${KBUILD_DEFCONFIG}"
Bruce,
It's an honor to get help from the author himself!
I'm starting to understand why they have this:
do_configure_prepend() {
cp "${S}/arch/${ARCH}/configs/${KBUILD_DEFCONFIG}"
|
By
mrkozmic@...
·
#55009
·
|
|
Re: LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION has no effect
#dunfell
#yocto
#kernel
Bruce, I just realized that I replied only to you and not to the group. Hope it is ok that I post your answer here.
Bruce, I just realized that I replied only to you and not to the group. Hope it is ok that I post your answer here.
|
By
mrkozmic@...
·
#55008
·
|
|
Re: #zeus meta-intel
#zeus
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
It will pull in igc. There's a separate recipe for igc in meta-intel.
compute-runtime will provide intel-opencl-icd but the package name is
different.
You can try
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
It will pull in igc. There's a separate recipe for igc in meta-intel.
compute-runtime will provide intel-opencl-icd but the package name is
different.
You can try
|
By
Anuj Mittal
·
#55007
·
|
|
Re: LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION has no effect
#dunfell
#yocto
#kernel
Assuming what you are using as a kernel recipe is linux-yocto based,
the code that is adding the CONFIG_LOCALVERSION is a task that runs
after do_configure. So just running -c configure, it shouldn't
Assuming what you are using as a kernel recipe is linux-yocto based,
the code that is adding the CONFIG_LOCALVERSION is a task that runs
after do_configure. So just running -c configure, it shouldn't
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#55006
·
|
|
Re: #zeus meta-intel
#zeus
Sorry for my ignorance, but I am missing your point, what exactly does the recipe provide when built, intel-opencl-icd ?, will it pull in igc ?
Sorry for my ignorance, but I am missing your point, what exactly does the recipe provide when built, intel-opencl-icd ?, will it pull in igc ?
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#55005
·
|
|
Re: #zeus meta-intel
#zeus
Sorry, I didn't understand the question. If you want to know which
version of OpenCL is supported, please see the README for version that
you're building. Also
Sorry, I didn't understand the question. If you want to know which
version of OpenCL is supported, please see the README for version that
you're building. Also
|
By
Anuj Mittal
·
#55004
·
|