|
Re: do_install & RDEPENDS
It's hard to say what happens if we can't see your recipes. Can you
publish them?
Alex
It's hard to say what happens if we can't see your recipes. Can you
publish them?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57842
·
|
|
Re: question about PREFERRED_RPROVIDER
I did as Richard suggested, It worked as expected now
feature-public.bb or feature-private.bb:
SRC_URI = "git://public or git://private"
PROVIDES += "virtual/feature"
RPROVIDES:${PN} += "
I did as Richard suggested, It worked as expected now
feature-public.bb or feature-private.bb:
SRC_URI = "git://public or git://private"
PROVIDES += "virtual/feature"
RPROVIDES:${PN} += "
|
By
John Wang
·
#57841
·
|
|
do_install & RDEPENDS
Inside the do_install I copy some files
but it seems that bitbake set those files in the RDEPENS.
In the log during the do_root_fs I see:
Requires(post): ... mylib.so
After that the commands fail with
Inside the do_install I copy some files
but it seems that bitbake set those files in the RDEPENS.
In the log during the do_root_fs I see:
Requires(post): ... mylib.so
After that the commands fail with
|
By
glmeocci@...
·
#57840
·
|
|
Re: A bitbake error caused by "Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE"
#bitbake
Then you need to check the output of 'env'
a) when you start the shell
b) when you use oe-init-build-env
and figure out how the incorrect variable gets into the environment.
Are you using
Then you need to check the output of 'env'
a) when you start the shell
b) when you use oe-init-build-env
and figure out how the incorrect variable gets into the environment.
Are you using
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57839
·
|
|
Re: question about PREFERRED_RPROVIDER
fetcher will try to get versions of recipes during parse phase and if
your recipes are using AUTOREV they will try to poke at git server for
latest commit SHA
are you using AUTOREV by chance ?
fetcher will try to get versions of recipes during parse phase and if
your recipes are using AUTOREV they will try to poke at git server for
latest commit SHA
are you using AUTOREV by chance ?
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#57838
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] suricata: fix compile issue
make[2]: *** No rule to make target '../rust/target/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi/release/libsuricata.a', needed by 'suricata'
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
make[2]: *** No rule to make target '../rust/target/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi/release/libsuricata.a', needed by 'suricata'
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57837
·
|
|
Re: question about PREFERRED_RPROVIDER
"virtual" entries only work in PROVIDES and PREFERRED_PROVIDER, not in
the runtime version of the variable.
Cheers,
Richard
"virtual" entries only work in PROVIDES and PREFERRED_PROVIDER, not in
the runtime version of the variable.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#57836
·
|
|
question about PREFERRED_RPROVIDER
Hi,
There is a package with two versions, private and public.
But when I use the PREFERRED_RPROVIDER to select the public version,
bitbake still tries fetch the private one, and then bitabke
Hi,
There is a package with two versions, private and public.
But when I use the PREFERRED_RPROVIDER to select the public version,
bitbake still tries fetch the private one, and then bitabke
|
By
John Wang
·
#57835
·
|
|
Re: A bitbake error caused by "Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE"
#bitbake
Hello,
you probably need to exit the shell and then restart it and
re-initialize your environment (with oe-init-build-env), as it
contains the obsolete variable.
Alex
Hello,
you probably need to exit the shell and then restart it and
re-initialize your environment (with oe-init-build-env), as it
contains the obsolete variable.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57834
·
|
|
A bitbake error caused by "Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE"
#bitbake
Hellow everyone, this is Yan. I am new to Yocto Project, still, I am learning.
There is a question, when I bitbaked my image I found this ERROR:
yanxk@yanxk-Ubuntu:~/Yocto/poky/build$ bitbake
Hellow everyone, this is Yan. I am new to Yocto Project, still, I am learning.
There is a question, when I bitbaked my image I found this ERROR:
yanxk@yanxk-Ubuntu:~/Yocto/poky/build$ bitbake
|
By
Yan Xinkuan
·
#57833
·
|
|
Re: [meta-security][PATCH] samhain-standalone: fix buildpaths issue
merged
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57832
·
|
|
Re: [meta-security][PATCH V2] meta-security: Add recipe for Glome
merged
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57831
·
|
|
Re: [meta-cgl][PATCH] resource-agents: Bug fix.
Merged.
By
Jeremy Puhlman
·
#57830
·
|
|
Unable to add .bb in a layer - newcomer to Yocto
#yocto
Hi all,
I have taken on myself a task to write a custom Yocto-based image for Nvidia Xavier which poses somewhat of a difficult task.
After few videos on Youtube and some documentation, I started
Hi all,
I have taken on myself a task to write a custom Yocto-based image for Nvidia Xavier which poses somewhat of a difficult task.
After few videos on Youtube and some documentation, I started
|
By
shauli.arazi@...
·
#57829
·
|
|
[meta-mingw][PATCH] Switch to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL
The changes to split classes into global vs. image specific contexts
has broken the inclusion of `wine` and `wineserver` host tools for
testing MinGW SDKs. This is because testsdk is an image specific
The changes to split classes into global vs. image specific contexts
has broken the inclusion of `wine` and `wineserver` host tools for
testing MinGW SDKs. This is because testsdk is an image specific
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#57828
·
|
|
Re: Remvove unwanted Udev rules
it is part of systemd recipe if your distro is based on systemd. In
that case, you can write a bbappend where you define
do_install:append() and delete it from staging area before it gets
packaged
it is part of systemd recipe if your distro is based on systemd. In
that case, you can write a bbappend where you define
do_install:append() and delete it from staging area before it gets
packaged
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#57827
·
|
|
Minutes: Yocto Project Weekly Triage Meeting 8/4/2022
Wiki: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage
Attendees: Steve Sakoman, Joshua Watt, Randy Macleod, Richard Purdie, Aryaman, Bruce Ashfield, Michael Opdenacker, Alexandre
Wiki: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage
Attendees: Steve Sakoman, Joshua Watt, Randy Macleod, Richard Purdie, Aryaman, Bruce Ashfield, Michael Opdenacker, Alexandre
|
By
sakib.sajal@...
·
#57826
·
|
|
meta-security build failure: suricata
Hello,
I am aware of a new build failure with suricata. I think it related to the glibc update.
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/150774/
I will have limited time to look into this in
Hello,
I am aware of a new build failure with suricata. I think it related to the glibc update.
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/150774/
I will have limited time to look into this in
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57825
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] samhain-standalone: fix buildpaths issue
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
Fixes:
WARNING: samhain-standalone-4.4.9-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/share/doc/samhain-standalone/scripts/samhain.ebuild-light in package
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
Fixes:
WARNING: samhain-standalone-4.4.9-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/share/doc/samhain-standalone/scripts/samhain.ebuild-light in package
|
By
Yu, Mingli
·
#57824
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.3.rc1)
Hello all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-4.0.3.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
Hello all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-4.0.3.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
|
By
Teoh, Jay Shen
·
#57823
·
|