|
A bitbake error caused by "Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE"
#bitbake
Hellow everyone, this is Yan. I am new to Yocto Project, still, I am learning.
There is a question, when I bitbaked my image I found this ERROR:
yanxk@yanxk-Ubuntu:~/Yocto/poky/build$ bitbake
Hellow everyone, this is Yan. I am new to Yocto Project, still, I am learning.
There is a question, when I bitbaked my image I found this ERROR:
yanxk@yanxk-Ubuntu:~/Yocto/poky/build$ bitbake
|
By
Yan Xinkuan
·
#57833
·
|
|
Re: [meta-security][PATCH] samhain-standalone: fix buildpaths issue
merged
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57832
·
|
|
Re: [meta-security][PATCH V2] meta-security: Add recipe for Glome
merged
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57831
·
|
|
Re: [meta-cgl][PATCH] resource-agents: Bug fix.
Merged.
By
Jeremy Puhlman
·
#57830
·
|
|
Unable to add .bb in a layer - newcomer to Yocto
#yocto
Hi all,
I have taken on myself a task to write a custom Yocto-based image for Nvidia Xavier which poses somewhat of a difficult task.
After few videos on Youtube and some documentation, I started
Hi all,
I have taken on myself a task to write a custom Yocto-based image for Nvidia Xavier which poses somewhat of a difficult task.
After few videos on Youtube and some documentation, I started
|
By
shauli.arazi@...
·
#57829
·
|
|
[meta-mingw][PATCH] Switch to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL
The changes to split classes into global vs. image specific contexts
has broken the inclusion of `wine` and `wineserver` host tools for
testing MinGW SDKs. This is because testsdk is an image specific
The changes to split classes into global vs. image specific contexts
has broken the inclusion of `wine` and `wineserver` host tools for
testing MinGW SDKs. This is because testsdk is an image specific
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#57828
·
|
|
Re: Remvove unwanted Udev rules
it is part of systemd recipe if your distro is based on systemd. In
that case, you can write a bbappend where you define
do_install:append() and delete it from staging area before it gets
packaged
it is part of systemd recipe if your distro is based on systemd. In
that case, you can write a bbappend where you define
do_install:append() and delete it from staging area before it gets
packaged
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#57827
·
|
|
Minutes: Yocto Project Weekly Triage Meeting 8/4/2022
Wiki: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage
Attendees: Steve Sakoman, Joshua Watt, Randy Macleod, Richard Purdie, Aryaman, Bruce Ashfield, Michael Opdenacker, Alexandre
Wiki: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage
Attendees: Steve Sakoman, Joshua Watt, Randy Macleod, Richard Purdie, Aryaman, Bruce Ashfield, Michael Opdenacker, Alexandre
|
By
sakib.sajal@...
·
#57826
·
|
|
meta-security build failure: suricata
Hello,
I am aware of a new build failure with suricata. I think it related to the glibc update.
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/150774/
I will have limited time to look into this in
Hello,
I am aware of a new build failure with suricata. I think it related to the glibc update.
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/150774/
I will have limited time to look into this in
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57825
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] samhain-standalone: fix buildpaths issue
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
Fixes:
WARNING: samhain-standalone-4.4.9-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/share/doc/samhain-standalone/scripts/samhain.ebuild-light in package
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
Fixes:
WARNING: samhain-standalone-4.4.9-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/share/doc/samhain-standalone/scripts/samhain.ebuild-light in package
|
By
Yu, Mingli
·
#57824
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.3.rc1)
Hello all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-4.0.3.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
Hello all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-4.0.3.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
|
By
Teoh, Jay Shen
·
#57823
·
|
|
QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.3.rc1)
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.0.3.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.0.3.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.0.3.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.0.3.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
|
By
Pokybuild User <pokybuild@...>
·
#57822
·
|
|
Kirkstone Upgrade now gives RDEPENDS error with /usr/bin/python
#python
#kirkstone
Good Afternoon,
I am updating a project from Honister to Kirkstone, Has anyone else run into an issue with python files with a #!/usr/bin/python header throwing the (abbreviated) Error below?
This
Good Afternoon,
I am updating a project from Honister to Kirkstone, Has anyone else run into an issue with python files with a #!/usr/bin/python header throwing the (abbreviated) Error below?
This
|
By
bgctkd@...
·
#57821
·
|
|
Mini-Summit in Dublin: Hands on with the Yocto Project
Howdy there!
We're happy to finally announce the Yocto Project Mini-Summit taking place the day before ELC-E in Dublin!
Monday, September 12th, 2022 | 2:00 – 5:30 PM
Location: Convention Centre
Howdy there!
We're happy to finally announce the Yocto Project Mini-Summit taking place the day before ELC-E in Dublin!
Monday, September 12th, 2022 | 2:00 – 5:30 PM
Location: Convention Centre
|
By
Josef Holzmayr
·
#57820
·
|
|
Re: Recipe with kernel configuration fragment
Hi Maik,
This is not possible because recipe data is local to the recipe, you cannot impact a recipe from another one.
The only way to have 2+ recipes doing some things in sync is by having a
Hi Maik,
This is not possible because recipe data is local to the recipe, you cannot impact a recipe from another one.
The only way to have 2+ recipes doing some things in sync is by having a
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#57819
·
|
|
Recipe with kernel configuration fragment
Hi,
For a firewall recipe using nftables we need to make some kernel configuration changes.
At first we added the needed CONFIG_ lines to a bbappend in the recipes-kernel directory of our own layer,
Hi,
For a firewall recipe using nftables we need to make some kernel configuration changes.
At first we added the needed CONFIG_ lines to a bbappend in the recipes-kernel directory of our own layer,
|
By
Maik Vermeulen
·
#57818
·
|
|
Re: How to insure SRCREV is consistent with PV
Hello,
the fetch is still executed in do_fetch task (and uses MIRROR/PREMIRROR etc), maybe you mean the 2nd fetch when the tag doesn't exist in specified branch added
Hello,
the fetch is still executed in do_fetch task (and uses MIRROR/PREMIRROR etc), maybe you mean the 2nd fetch when the tag doesn't exist in specified branch added
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#57817
·
|
|
#kirkstone qemu
#kirkstone
Hello:
I built kirkstone core-image-sato from scratch no modifications, clean build was going test kirkstone out…
When I went to run using qemu I saw the following issue with “tun”, even
Hello:
I built kirkstone core-image-sato from scratch no modifications, clean build was going test kirkstone out…
When I went to run using qemu I saw the following issue with “tun”, even
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#57816
·
|
|
Re: How to insure SRCREV is consistent with PV
Hello
Thanks for your answer.
Reading your code, I wonder why you need to do a fetch, it looks very resource consuming.
Philippe
Hello
Thanks for your answer.
Reading your code, I wonder why you need to do a fetch, it looks very resource consuming.
Philippe
|
By
Philippe Midol-Monnet
·
#57815
·
|
|
Yocto Project Status 9 August 2022 (WW32)
Current Dev Position: YP 4.1 M3
Next Deadline: 22nd August 2022 YP 4.1 M3 Build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday August 11th 7:30 am PDT
Current Dev Position: YP 4.1 M3
Next Deadline: 22nd August 2022 YP 4.1 M3 Build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday August 11th 7:30 am PDT
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#57814
·
|