Hi Quentin/Khem, I apologize for not reviewing this patch in a timely manner; I'm sorry for the frustration it caused. Would this have been solved by (me) creating a honister branch? I

All, YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW50 are listed below: Priority Bug ID Short Description Changer Owner Was Became Medium+ 10693 Add a testcase for multilib eSDK on

All, The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week! Who Count richard.purdie@... 4 jon.mason@... 1 randy.macleod@... 1 Grand Total 6 Thanks, Stephen K.

All, Below is the list as of top 46 bug owners as of the end of WW50 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.5. There are 94 possible work days left until the final

All, The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on

I agree with you that broken is not good as it was for sometime, but now with the latest supported release in 3.4 series ( which is 3.4.1) things should be good.

Hi José, The issue is that you masked a recipe whose packages are required by other recipes packages. Find where the RDEPENDS is set for this recipe package and remove the package which depends on

Hi Léon, Did you check that your kernel actually supports squashfs as rootfs? There is a Kconfig option for it IIRC. Since it's an image feature, it's not going to impact anything outside of the

Hi Khem, We need this patch for honister 3.4 but what I meant is that even though it's not needed for honister >= 3.4.1, I'm still interested in what the policy should be. Especially what we should

Do we still need this patch ? I think now that dot release is out it’s less of a problem. Version specific patching will set a different preset for the layer to carry unexcercised patches

Dear all, Currently I have created an image which upon boot mounts my rootfs as readonly in an overlay with my data partition. I set out to change the FS type of my rootfs to something that is

Hi all. I have added a recipe to BBMASK to skip the processing of this recipe for now, but when I try to compile the image i getERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES <recipe> error. It’s like I should say

ping

Hello, We are pleased to announce the Yocto Project 3.4.1 Release is now available for

This is done regularly by the overall AB maintenance tooling, and erasing build artifacts makes it difficult to find out what went wrong when it does. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin

A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.5_M1.rc2) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at: https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.5_M1.rc2 Build hash information: bitbake:

Looks good

Thanks for driving this. please add me to the list. -armin

The _virtual notation is not an override. These syntax "fixes" need to be reverted. In the case of the kernel override, when it was added, the rock-pi-e needed the latest kernel (linux-yocto-dev) but

The _virtual notation is not an override. These syntax "fixes" need to be reverted. In the case of the kernel override, when it was added, the rock-pi-e needed the latest kernel (linux-yocto-dev) but