|
Re: build failure on current
Fair enough. And I should mention that the error I reported occurs on
Ubuntu 10.04. It's not like I wasn't warned. :-}
WARNING: Host distribution "Ubuntu 10.04 LTS" has not been validated
with
Fair enough. And I should mention that the error I reported occurs on
Ubuntu 10.04. It's not like I wasn't warned. :-}
WARNING: Host distribution "Ubuntu 10.04 LTS" has not been validated
with
|
By
Evade Flow <evadeflow@...>
·
#9674
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
I was told that I hit the server at a busy time thus causing the fetch to fail. I just re-ran it and ran error free. I was also told this was a rare occurrence but it does happen.
Scott
I was told that I hit the server at a busy time thus causing the fetch to fail. I just re-ran it and ran error free. I was also told this was a rare occurrence but it does happen.
Scott
|
By
Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...>
·
#9673
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
Something was bugging me about this, so I dug up my notes. I was wrong when I
said switching to denzil fixed my problem---it did NOT. I simply cannot
untar/uncompress the perl archive from CPAN with
Something was bugging me about this, so I dug up my notes. I was wrong when I
said switching to denzil fixed my problem---it did NOT. I simply cannot
untar/uncompress the perl archive from CPAN with
|
By
Evade Flow <evadeflow@...>
·
#9672
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
I'm new to Yocto, but I've seen similar errors that seem to be due to
differences in the version of tar on the build server. Everything's
fine on this machine:
good% tar --version
tar (GNU tar)
I'm new to Yocto, but I've seen similar errors that seem to be due to
differences in the version of tar on the build server. Everything's
fine on this machine:
good% tar --version
tar (GNU tar)
|
By
Evade Flow <evadeflow@...>
·
#9671
·
|
|
build failure on current
I am running through the build example for the QS and hit a failure when trying to access git://git.yoctoproject.org/libowl;protocol=git. I started with the tarball here:
I am running through the build example for the QS and hit a failure when trying to access git://git.yoctoproject.org/libowl;protocol=git. I started with the tarball here:
|
By
Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...>
·
#9670
·
|
|
Re: Python 3 Recipe
I have recipes for if 3.3 actually I will publish it after 1.3 release it needs some fine touches
I have recipes for if 3.3 actually I will publish it after 1.3 release it needs some fine touches
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#9669
·
|
|
Python 3 Recipe
Hi all,
Are there any plans for Yocto to includePython 3.2.3 as an alternative to the Python 2.7.3 recipes? I mightneed to use it at some point, so I was wondering if it was on the
Hi all,
Are there any plans for Yocto to includePython 3.2.3 as an alternative to the Python 2.7.3 recipes? I mightneed to use it at some point, so I was wondering if it was on the
|
By
daniel_norris@...
·
#9668
·
|
|
Re: Cannot do atom-pc build with meta-cedartrail
Yeah, looks like the other SRC_URIs do that, but it's missing from that
SRC_URI - I just pushed a fix for this one to meta-intel/master.
Tom
Yeah, looks like the other SRC_URIs do that, but it's missing from that
SRC_URI - I just pushed a fix for this one to meta-intel/master.
Tom
|
By
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
·
#9667
·
|
|
Autogen and libopts/Autoopts - native package that generates the source for a target package.
Hi,
I have a recipe that uses GNU autoopts, which generates a dependency on libopts. This is the library that is required for any package using autoopts to compile.
GNU autoopts is a tool that is
Hi,
I have a recipe that uses GNU autoopts, which generates a dependency on libopts. This is the library that is required for any package using autoopts to compile.
GNU autoopts is a tool that is
|
By
Tim O'Callaghan <tocallaghan@...>
·
#9666
·
|
|
Re: Cannot do atom-pc build with meta-cedartrail
That's a bug alright.
It seems the overall SRC_URI of linux-yocto is overwritten by meta-cedartrail layer, when included. Should be fixed by using SRC_URI_cedartrail instead.
--
Mihai Lindner
That's a bug alright.
It seems the overall SRC_URI of linux-yocto is overwritten by meta-cedartrail layer, when included. Should be fixed by using SRC_URI_cedartrail instead.
--
Mihai Lindner
|
By
Mihai Lindner <mihaix.lindner@...>
·
#9665
·
|
|
Cannot do atom-pc build with meta-cedartrail
Hi,
If I add meta-intel and meta-cedartrail to my bblayers, when I try and
do an atom-pc build (which I thought should still work, right?) I get
the following error:
NOTE: Error during finalise
Hi,
If I add meta-intel and meta-cedartrail to my bblayers, when I try and
do an atom-pc build (which I thought should still work, right?) I get
the following error:
NOTE: Error during finalise
|
By
Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...>
·
#9664
·
|
|
Re: Yocto Bug Trend ww38
Hello,
Yes they can be separated from the Medium bugs (now they are all counted together).
Also if we want their “weight” to differ from the Medium ones we can change that too (I would suggest
Hello,
Yes they can be separated from the Medium bugs (now they are all counted together).
Also if we want their “weight” to differ from the Medium ones we can change that too (I would suggest
|
By
Serban, Laurentiu <laurentiu.serban@...>
·
#9663
·
|
|
Re: Yocto info
Hi Joy and Kishore,
2 things you need to fix/check:
1. Please extract your toolchain to /opt/poky, basically go to your root directory “/” and run “sudo tar –xvjf path to your
Hi Joy and Kishore,
2 things you need to fix/check:
1. Please extract your toolchain to /opt/poky, basically go to your root directory “/” and run “sudo tar –xvjf path to your
|
By
Zhang, Jessica
·
#9662
·
|
|
Re: Yocto info
Copying to the Yocto Mailing list.
Is anyone familiar with Eclipse tool and Yocto Project ADT?
Thanks
Kishore.
Copying to the Yocto Mailing list.
Is anyone familiar with Eclipse tool and Yocto Project ADT?
Thanks
Kishore.
|
By
Bodke, Kishore K <kishore.k.bodke@...>
·
#9661
·
|
|
Re: Yocto Bug Trend ww38
I just noticed that the open bug trends don't call out the medium+ bugs. Can these be added?
From: <Serban>, Laurentiu Serban <laurentiu.serban@...<mailto:laurentiu.serban@...>>
Date:
I just noticed that the open bug trends don't call out the medium+ bugs. Can these be added?
From: <Serban>, Laurentiu Serban <laurentiu.serban@...<mailto:laurentiu.serban@...>>
Date:
|
By
David Stewart
·
#9660
·
|
|
Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.
Dear Chris,
In message <CABcZANmPe_D+GPWxnkVZCmE9ti011ZDSXxPix8ztW4vrdYiyZA@...> you wrote:
Sorry, but I don't get how this is supposed to work.
I have an incompatible change, and
Dear Chris,
In message <CABcZANmPe_D+GPWxnkVZCmE9ti011ZDSXxPix8ztW4vrdYiyZA@...> you wrote:
Sorry, but I don't get how this is supposed to work.
I have an incompatible change, and
|
By
Wolfgang Denk <wd@...>
·
#9659
·
|
|
Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.
This is wrong. A compatibility break in bblayers.conf is *extremely* rare.
Wrong. The user has to know that they may need to change their
bblayers.conf to match the upstream structure. If it didn't
This is wrong. A compatibility break in bblayers.conf is *extremely* rare.
Wrong. The user has to know that they may need to change their
bblayers.conf to match the upstream structure. If it didn't
|
By
Chris Larson <clarson@...>
·
#9658
·
|
|
Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.
Dear Paul,
In message <224780988.1nyHnvScgz@helios> you wrote:
Well, the comment in "meta-yocto/conf/bblayers.conf.sample" says:
# LAYER_CONF_VERSION is increased each time
Dear Paul,
In message <224780988.1nyHnvScgz@helios> you wrote:
Well, the comment in "meta-yocto/conf/bblayers.conf.sample" says:
# LAYER_CONF_VERSION is increased each time
|
By
Wolfgang Denk <wd@...>
·
#9657
·
|
|
Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.
The rationale is for this specific increase is this: if you previously had
meta-yocto in your existing bblayers.conf, since the reference BSP parts of
meta-yocto were split out into meta-yocto-bsp
The rationale is for this specific increase is this: if you previously had
meta-yocto in your existing bblayers.conf, since the reference BSP parts of
meta-yocto were split out into meta-yocto-bsp
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#9656
·
|
|
Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.
They're both set exactly the way they should be. You're only affected
by the bblayers compatibility change if you use poky, as far as I'm
aware.
--
Christopher Larson
They're both set exactly the way they should be. You're only affected
by the bblayers compatibility change if you use poky, as far as I'm
aware.
--
Christopher Larson
|
By
Chris Larson <clarson@...>
·
#9655
·
|