yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org

Re: build failure on current

Something was bugging me about this, so I dug up my notes. I was wrong when I said switching to denzil fixed my problem---it did NOT. I simply cannot untar/uncompress the perl archive from CPAN with

By Evade Flow <evadeflow@...> · #9672 ·

Re: build failure on current

I'm new to Yocto, but I've seen similar errors that seem to be due to differences in the version of tar on the build server. Everything's fine on this machine: good% tar --version tar (GNU tar)

By Evade Flow <evadeflow@...> · #9671 ·

build failure on current

I am running through the build example for the QS and hit a failure when trying to access git://git.yoctoproject.org/libowl;protocol=git. I started with the tarball here:

By Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...> · #9670 ·

Re: Python 3 Recipe

I have recipes for if 3.3 actually I will publish it after 1.3 release it needs some fine touches

By Khem Raj · #9669 ·

Python 3 Recipe

Hi all, Are there any plans for Yocto to includePython 3.2.3 as an alternative to the Python 2.7.3 recipes? I mightneed to use it at some point, so I was wondering if it was on the

By daniel_norris@... · #9668 ·

Re: Cannot do atom-pc build with meta-cedartrail

Yeah, looks like the other SRC_URIs do that, but it's missing from that SRC_URI - I just pushed a fix for this one to meta-intel/master. Tom

By Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...> · #9667 ·

Autogen and libopts/Autoopts - native package that generates the source for a target package.

Hi, I have a recipe that uses GNU autoopts, which generates a dependency on libopts. This is the library that is required for any package using autoopts to compile. GNU autoopts is a tool that is

By Tim O'Callaghan <tocallaghan@...> · #9666 ·

Re: Cannot do atom-pc build with meta-cedartrail

That's a bug alright. It seems the overall SRC_URI of linux-yocto is overwritten by meta-cedartrail layer, when included. Should be fixed by using SRC_URI_cedartrail instead. -- Mihai Lindner

By Mihai Lindner <mihaix.lindner@...> · #9665 ·

Cannot do atom-pc build with meta-cedartrail

Hi, If I add meta-intel and meta-cedartrail to my bblayers, when I try and do an atom-pc build (which I thought should still work, right?) I get the following error: NOTE: Error during finalise

By Burton, Ross <ross.burton@...> · #9664 ·

Re: Yocto Bug Trend ww38

Hello, Yes they can be separated from the Medium bugs (now they are all counted together). Also if we want their “weight” to differ from the Medium ones we can change that too (I would suggest

By Serban, Laurentiu <laurentiu.serban@...> · #9663 ·

Re: Yocto info

Hi Joy and Kishore, 2 things you need to fix/check: 1. Please extract your toolchain to /opt/poky, basically go to your root directory “/” and run “sudo tar –xvjf path to your

By Zhang, Jessica · #9662 ·

Re: Yocto info

Copying to the Yocto Mailing list. Is anyone familiar with Eclipse tool and Yocto Project ADT? Thanks Kishore.

By Bodke, Kishore K <kishore.k.bodke@...> · #9661 ·

Re: Yocto Bug Trend ww38

I just noticed that the open bug trends don't call out the medium+ bugs. Can these be added? From: <Serban>, Laurentiu Serban <laurentiu.serban@...<mailto:laurentiu.serban@...>> Date:

By David Stewart · #9660 ·

Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.

Dear Chris, In message <CABcZANmPe_D+GPWxnkVZCmE9ti011ZDSXxPix8ztW4vrdYiyZA@...> you wrote: Sorry, but I don't get how this is supposed to work. I have an incompatible change, and

By Wolfgang Denk <wd@...> · #9659 ·

Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.

This is wrong. A compatibility break in bblayers.conf is *extremely* rare. Wrong. The user has to know that they may need to change their bblayers.conf to match the upstream structure. If it didn't

By Chris Larson <clarson@...> · #9658 ·

Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.

Dear Paul, In message <224780988.1nyHnvScgz@helios> you wrote: Well, the comment in "meta-yocto/conf/bblayers.conf.sample" says: # LAYER_CONF_VERSION is increased each time

By Wolfgang Denk <wd@...> · #9657 ·

Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.

The rationale is for this specific increase is this: if you previously had meta-yocto in your existing bblayers.conf, since the reference BSP parts of meta-yocto were split out into meta-yocto-bsp

By Paul Eggleton · #9656 ·

Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.

They're both set exactly the way they should be. You're only affected by the bblayers compatibility change if you use poky, as far as I'm aware. -- Christopher Larson

By Chris Larson <clarson@...> · #9655 ·

Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.

Dear Paul Eggleton, In message <2428256.OTjtN2nWn5@helios> you wrote: Well, what is the rationale for setting LAYER_CONF_VERSION=6 in meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf, then? If meta layer specific

By Wolfgang Denk <wd@...> · #9654 ·

Re: 1.3_M5.rc2 status.

That will work, but normally you would edit conf/bblayers.conf, since meta/conf/sanity.conf is part of the metadata. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre

By Paul Eggleton · #9653 ·

Messages