|
Re: build failure on current
It definitely chokes on perl when building core-image-minimal from scratch on
my Ubuntu 10.04 LTS machine. But... it *did* build tar 1.26!(?) And even this
tar cannot, it seems, unpack the
It definitely chokes on perl when building core-image-minimal from scratch on
my Ubuntu 10.04 LTS machine. But... it *did* build tar 1.26!(?) And even this
tar cannot, it seems, unpack the
|
By
Evade Flow <evadeflow@...>
·
#9687
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
Just to confirm, this is the same path you get if you run "cat pseudodone" in
your build directory?
No, the code to do this was there in denzil as well. Here's the code cut out
into a shell script
Just to confirm, this is the same path you get if you run "cat pseudodone" in
your build directory?
No, the code to do this was there in denzil as well. Here's the code cut out
into a shell script
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#9686
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
Seems it definitely didn't build tar:
evadeflow% pwd
/home/evadeflow/projects/poky-git/build/tmp/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/bin
evadeflow% ls t*
tabs tailf taskset tic toe tput tset tunctl
Seems it definitely didn't build tar:
evadeflow% pwd
/home/evadeflow/projects/poky-git/build/tmp/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/bin
evadeflow% ls t*
tabs tailf taskset tic toe tput tset tunctl
|
By
Evade Flow <evadeflow@...>
·
#9685
·
|
|
[PATCH] mtd-utils: update SRC_URI to support BB_NO_NETWORK
Move the tag from the SRC_URI to SRCREV to enable builds
using BB_NO_NETWORK
Signed-off-by: Martin Donnelly <martin.donnelly@...>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_1.5.0.bb | 5 +++--
1
Move the tag from the SRC_URI to SRCREV to enable builds
using BB_NO_NETWORK
Signed-off-by: Martin Donnelly <martin.donnelly@...>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/mtd/mtd-utils_1.5.0.bb | 5 +++--
1
|
By
Martin Donnelly <martin.donnelly@...>
·
#9684
·
|
|
Re: [meta-baryon][PATCH 0/4] clear up build warnings
Merged to meta-baryon master, thanks.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Merged to meta-baryon master, thanks.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#9683
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/1] [meta-intel] meta-crystalforest: Create a custom build Image recipe.
From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@...>
To build with the corpus files recipes, create a customized
recipe to install them into the Image.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke
From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@...>
To build with the corpus files recipes, create a customized
recipe to install them into the Image.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke
|
By
kishore.k.bodke@...
·
#9682
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/1][meta-intel] Add a custom Image recipe
From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@...>
This patch adds the custom build Image recipe to install
all the corpus files into the image.
Please pull them into meta-intel/master.
From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@...>
This patch adds the custom build Image recipe to install
all the corpus files into the image.
Please pull them into meta-intel/master.
|
By
kishore.k.bodke@...
·
#9681
·
|
|
[meta-baryon][PATCH 4/4] talloc: specify the version of LGPL and include the license text
talloc is made available under version 3 (or later) of the LGPL.
This change fixes the following warning:
"WARNING: talloc: No generic license file exists for: LGPL in any provider"
Signed-off-by:
talloc is made available under version 3 (or later) of the LGPL.
This change fixes the following warning:
"WARNING: talloc: No generic license file exists for: LGPL in any provider"
Signed-off-by:
|
By
Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser@...>
·
#9679
·
|
|
[meta-baryon][PATCH 3/4] orc: specify the generic licenses being used
With the exception of source that contains the Mersenne Twister algorithm,
the majority of orc source code is made available under the BSD 2-Clause
license. The source that contains the Mersenne
With the exception of source that contains the Mersenne Twister algorithm,
the majority of orc source code is made available under the BSD 2-Clause
license. The source that contains the Mersenne
|
By
Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser@...>
·
#9680
·
|
|
[meta-baryon][PATCH 2/4] samba: remove unused directories after install
Some of the directories that are created during installation are left
empty and not shipped in the image.
Removing them clears up the following QA warning:
"WARNING: QA Issue: samba:
Some of the directories that are created during installation are left
empty and not shipped in the image.
Removing them clears up the following QA warning:
"WARNING: QA Issue: samba:
|
By
Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser@...>
·
#9677
·
|
|
[meta-baryon][PATCH 1/4] proftpd: remove unused directories after install
Some of the directories that are created during installation are left
empty and not shipped in the image.
Removing them clears up the following QA warning:
"WARNING: QA Issue: proftpd:
Some of the directories that are created during installation are left
empty and not shipped in the image.
Removing them clears up the following QA warning:
"WARNING: QA Issue: proftpd:
|
By
Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser@...>
·
#9678
·
|
|
[meta-baryon][PATCH 0/4] clear up build warnings
This patch set clears up some of the warnings that are generated when
building baryon against the tip of the 1.3_M3 branch of poky.
The following changes since commit
This patch set clears up some of the warnings that are generated when
building baryon against the tip of the 1.3_M3 branch of poky.
The following changes since commit
|
By
Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser@...>
·
#9676
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
Yeah, it's just a warning :)
This issue is rather perplexing. We're supposed to not be using the host tar
if it is older than 1.24 due to another bug in earlier versions - if an older
version is
Yeah, it's just a warning :)
This issue is rather perplexing. We're supposed to not be using the host tar
if it is older than 1.24 due to another bug in earlier versions - if an older
version is
|
By
Paul Eggleton
·
#9675
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
Fair enough. And I should mention that the error I reported occurs on
Ubuntu 10.04. It's not like I wasn't warned. :-}
WARNING: Host distribution "Ubuntu 10.04 LTS" has not been validated
with
Fair enough. And I should mention that the error I reported occurs on
Ubuntu 10.04. It's not like I wasn't warned. :-}
WARNING: Host distribution "Ubuntu 10.04 LTS" has not been validated
with
|
By
Evade Flow <evadeflow@...>
·
#9674
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
I was told that I hit the server at a busy time thus causing the fetch to fail. I just re-ran it and ran error free. I was also told this was a rare occurrence but it does happen.
Scott
I was told that I hit the server at a busy time thus causing the fetch to fail. I just re-ran it and ran error free. I was also told this was a rare occurrence but it does happen.
Scott
|
By
Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...>
·
#9673
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
Something was bugging me about this, so I dug up my notes. I was wrong when I
said switching to denzil fixed my problem---it did NOT. I simply cannot
untar/uncompress the perl archive from CPAN with
Something was bugging me about this, so I dug up my notes. I was wrong when I
said switching to denzil fixed my problem---it did NOT. I simply cannot
untar/uncompress the perl archive from CPAN with
|
By
Evade Flow <evadeflow@...>
·
#9672
·
|
|
Re: build failure on current
I'm new to Yocto, but I've seen similar errors that seem to be due to
differences in the version of tar on the build server. Everything's
fine on this machine:
good% tar --version
tar (GNU tar)
I'm new to Yocto, but I've seen similar errors that seem to be due to
differences in the version of tar on the build server. Everything's
fine on this machine:
good% tar --version
tar (GNU tar)
|
By
Evade Flow <evadeflow@...>
·
#9671
·
|
|
build failure on current
I am running through the build example for the QS and hit a failure when trying to access git://git.yoctoproject.org/libowl;protocol=git. I started with the tarball here:
I am running through the build example for the QS and hit a failure when trying to access git://git.yoctoproject.org/libowl;protocol=git. I started with the tarball here:
|
By
Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...>
·
#9670
·
|
|
Re: Python 3 Recipe
I have recipes for if 3.3 actually I will publish it after 1.3 release it needs some fine touches
I have recipes for if 3.3 actually I will publish it after 1.3 release it needs some fine touches
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#9669
·
|
|
Python 3 Recipe
Hi all,
Are there any plans for Yocto to includePython 3.2.3 as an alternative to the Python 2.7.3 recipes? I mightneed to use it at some point, so I was wondering if it was on the
Hi all,
Are there any plans for Yocto to includePython 3.2.3 as an alternative to the Python 2.7.3 recipes? I mightneed to use it at some point, so I was wondering if it was on the
|
By
daniel_norris@...
·
#9668
·
|