Looks like the order of packages (as shown in bitbake.conf) in PACKAGES variable is different in 1.3_M3 compared to Denzel. In 1.3_M3, ${PN} package is last (that is comes after ${PN}-dev package)

oe-core/meta/conf/bitbake.conf specifies the default package settings. However the problem I seem to be seeing is that my recipe is not able to override the default. However let me know if I should

FYI: new user stuck having to implement a bps found the description below about the extra demarcation between groups and partitions helpful. Now if only I knew which branches were partitions and

Read oe-core/meta/conf/bitbake.conf. -- Christopher Larson

You are right, these are regular files and not symlinks and are ending up in usr/lib in packagename-dev package However I want them to be in the regular package. I do have the following statement in

I'm using OEBasicHash on one jenkins setup, but that one is still building changes from 2 days ago.. (building 24/7.. ) -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@...

I'm not an expert, but here's some information that I believe is correct. (If someone else knows better, please correct this...) bitbake reads the entire set of recipe files that are specified by the

this seems to be a proper file and not a symlink so firstly you have .so in -dev packages if you fix that it will work secondly if you intentionally want those .so in -dev package then

Hi, I am using poky/1.3_M3 branch and I get a bunch of “ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary:” My recipe is for installing binary files only. I have the following statement in

Just back from vacation and getting to this... Yeah, this is a known bug and was fixed by the yocto-bsp patchsets I sent out just before I left. See the last entry in the bug below for links to the

... I was seriously stumped by the presence of rpm in what I felt should have been a very basic image. If a task/group is targeted at lsb, it needs to have lsb plastered all over the name so the rest

yes seems so. I have stopped using OEBasic long ago, you should stop using it too. But feel free to send a PR bump patchlet.

Hrm, nah. Let's leave it and address it if someone else raises a concern. I might be alone here. With a UK architect it seemed presumptuous to do otherwise ;-) Yeah... I think we need to kill config

Looks good to me, thanks. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre

if there's no objection, i added how to add multiple packages as well, just below that. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day

Fixed. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Seems clearly correct. Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...> -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel

Fair enough. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel

Good advice. A quick check of openembedded-core shows that gst-ffmpeg appears to be one of the packages available. Yes, definitely check the hob.

grrrrrr ... ^ "=" the "+=" is redundant. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa,