|
[PATCH 0/2] linux-yocto: add atom-pc-rt and systemtap
Richard/Saul,
Here are the updated SRCREVs for Darren's recent atom-pc-rt work
and Tom's systemtap configs.
Cheers,
Bruce
Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
Branch: zedd/kernel
Richard/Saul,
Here are the updated SRCREVs for Darren's recent atom-pc-rt work
and Tom's systemtap configs.
Cheers,
Bruce
Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
Branch: zedd/kernel
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#801
·
|
|
Re: Building all packages using the released toolchain
Yes.
Poky.git is a repo which contains a bunch of branches. One simple way you can verify
is to use "git branch", and if "*master" is shown then you're using the master branch.
If it still doesn't
Yes.
Poky.git is a repo which contains a bunch of branches. One simple way you can verify
is to use "git branch", and if "*master" is shown then you're using the master branch.
If it still doesn't
|
By
Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@...>
·
#798
·
|
|
Re: Current Build Failures for d82f205cfa790b40e132e11b7937050bc3b97ff3
What's the patch you made for autobuilder? I think the patch I sent out yesterday can prevent the cascading failure but it has not been checked in yet.
Best Regards,
Jiajun
What's the patch you made for autobuilder? I think the patch I sent out yesterday can prevent the cascading failure but it has not been checked in yet.
Best Regards,
Jiajun
|
By
Xu, Jiajun <jiajun.xu@...>
·
#797
·
|
|
Re: Current Build Failures for d82f205cfa790b40e132e11b7937050bc3b97ff3
Are your package lists identical ? Sounds like host contamination
to me and perf is deciding to build perl or not perl based on
what the host has installed.
This works .. or to get the functionality
Are your package lists identical ? Sounds like host contamination
to me and perf is deciding to build perl or not perl based on
what the host has installed.
This works .. or to get the functionality
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#796
·
|
|
Re: Current Build Failures for d82f205cfa790b40e132e11b7937050bc3b97ff3
Hi,
I have two build machines:
x86 ubuntu 10.04 at work
x86_64 ubuntu 10.04 at home
At home all things goes ok. But at work perf has failed.
The problem is LIBPERL. I can't understand why but at
Hi,
I have two build machines:
x86 ubuntu 10.04 at work
x86_64 ubuntu 10.04 at home
At home all things goes ok. But at work perf has failed.
The problem is LIBPERL. I can't understand why but at
|
By
João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas
·
#795
·
|
|
question about SDKMACHINE, SDK_ARCH and BUILD_ARCH
Hi Richard,
As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves differently on 64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup perspective. It never enforces SDKMACHINE to be set in local.conf
Hi Richard,
As I mentioned in IRC, we've noticed that bitbake behaves differently on 64bit and 32bit machines from SDKMACHINE setup perspective. It never enforces SDKMACHINE to be set in local.conf
|
By
Zhang, Jessica
·
#794
·
|
|
Re: Current Build Failures for d82f205cfa790b40e132e11b7937050bc3b97ff3
Yeah, it's strange that this starts happening seemingly out of the blue
- nothing wrt this has changed recently AFAICS.
Coincidentally, I was going to look at perf scripting next week - guess
I'll
Yeah, it's strange that this starts happening seemingly out of the blue
- nothing wrt this has changed recently AFAICS.
Coincidentally, I was going to look at perf scripting next week - guess
I'll
|
By
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
·
#793
·
|
|
Re: Current Build Failures for d82f205cfa790b40e132e11b7937050bc3b97ff3
I saw this one as well, but hadn't gone back to look at
it yet. Did something change underneath us?
I haven't updated any parts of the recipes or kernel that
would have triggered the new failure. Or
I saw this one as well, but hadn't gone back to look at
it yet. Did something change underneath us?
I haven't updated any parts of the recipes or kernel that
would have triggered the new failure. Or
|
By
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
·
#792
·
|
|
Current Build Failures for d82f205cfa790b40e132e11b7937050bc3b97ff3
All,
The current nightly based on d82f205cfa790b40e132e11b7937050bc3b97ff3 is
showing 3 build failures so far.
Machine: qemux86
Failure: intermittent tasks_0.18 failure at do_compile
Description:
All,
The current nightly based on d82f205cfa790b40e132e11b7937050bc3b97ff3 is
showing 3 build failures so far.
Machine: qemux86
Failure: intermittent tasks_0.18 failure at do_compile
Description:
|
By
Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@...>
·
#791
·
|
|
Re: Building all packages using the released toolchain
Yes, it's make 3.82 related. My gut-feeling is that FC12 should have an older version
which ends up wrong here. :-)
OK, I remembered that there're a series of patches to make FC14 happy after
Yes, it's make 3.82 related. My gut-feeling is that FC12 should have an older version
which ends up wrong here. :-)
OK, I remembered that there're a series of patches to make FC14 happy after
|
By
Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@...>
·
#790
·
|
|
Re: [poky] [PATCH 0/5] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request
Everything got pulled this time
In Master now
Thanks
Sau!
Everything got pulled this time
In Master now
Thanks
Sau!
|
By
Saul Wold <sgw@...>
·
#789
·
|
|
Re: [poky] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto: add routerstation pro and mpc8315e-rdb support
Pulled into master
Thanks
Sau!
Pulled into master
Thanks
Sau!
|
By
Saul Wold <saul.wold@...>
·
#788
·
|
|
Re: Building all packages using the released toolchain
Ok. I was not sure if it was specific to Fedora 14 or not. The Quick
Start mentions Fedora 14 "or another distribution with GNU make 3.82"
which is what I have on Fedora 12, so I thought this step
Ok. I was not sure if it was specific to Fedora 14 or not. The Quick
Start mentions Fedora 14 "or another distribution with GNU make 3.82"
which is what I have on Fedora 12, so I thought this step
|
By
Rick De Laet <rdelaet@...>
·
#787
·
|
|
Re: Building all packages using the released toolchain
The make-native is required on Fedora14. So you don't need that step and
Instead you could directly:
Bitbake poky-image-sato
Btw, could you post your errors?
For native packages, yes the host
The make-native is required on Fedora14. So you don't need that step and
Instead you could directly:
Bitbake poky-image-sato
Btw, could you post your errors?
For native packages, yes the host
|
By
Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@...>
·
#786
·
|
|
Building all packages using the released toolchain
I am new to yocto, I have installed yacto on Fedora 12.
I was trying to follow the steps in the getting started guide and was
trying a build with "bitbake make-native" and got some build errors
I am new to yocto, I have installed yacto on Fedora 12.
I was trying to follow the steps in the getting started guide and was
trying a build with "bitbake make-native" and got some build errors
|
By
Rick De Laet <rdelaet@...>
·
#785
·
|
|
Re: LTP status for Yocto 1.0/M2
Hi, Dave,
Yes, LSB contains cron. I talked to Jiajun about choice of the profile. SDK profile simplifies QA’s test effort since it runs on both Qemu and real hardware, while LSB profile is not
Hi, Dave,
Yes, LSB contains cron. I talked to Jiajun about choice of the profile. SDK profile simplifies QA’s test effort since it runs on both Qemu and real hardware, while LSB profile is not
|
By
Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@...>
·
#784
·
|
|
Re: Changes to the autobuilder.
I agree, it does seem odd, but since there was a standard already in
place (for historical reasons, I'm sure) with emenlow and atom-pc of
<machine>/<arch>/ I wanted to make sure I didn't mess up
I agree, it does seem odd, but since there was a standard already in
place (for historical reasons, I'm sure) with emenlow and atom-pc of
<machine>/<arch>/ I wanted to make sure I didn't mess up
|
By
Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@...>
·
#783
·
|
|
Re: Changes to the autobuilder.
once you've descended into machine_name, "arch" seems superfluous. Won't
it be the only directory? Would it make more sense as:
machines/arch/machine_name ?
machines
x86
qemux86
atom-pc
once you've descended into machine_name, "arch" seems superfluous. Won't
it be the only directory? Would it make more sense as:
machines/arch/machine_name ?
machines
x86
qemux86
atom-pc
|
By
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
·
#782
·
|
|
Re: ntp client
Hi,
I have a layer and will try it.
If all thinks goes well, I submit a patch.
In OE I used openntpd. The busybox ntp client does not support a config file.
Thanks.
--
Hi,
I have a layer and will try it.
If all thinks goes well, I submit a patch.
In OE I used openntpd. The busybox ntp client does not support a config file.
Thanks.
--
|
By
João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas
·
#781
·
|
|
Re: ntp client
João,
If you are creating a layer, then it would be best to create a busybox.bbappend file that enables the options you are looking for. You can also add an ntp client in your layer, you just need
João,
If you are creating a layer, then it would be best to create a busybox.bbappend file that enables the options you are looking for. You can also add an ntp client in your layer, you just need
|
By
Saul Wold <saul.wold@...>
·
#780
·
|