This list is created via license_create_manifest within license.bbclass. I'm currently in the process of refactoring it quite a bit so I'll look out for this issue. It derives the list from

I used poky-denzil-7.0 to build a core-image-minimal for the BeagleBoard. Now I am looking for a list of everything that went into my image together with the license information. The logical thing

I've updated this license to be more specific. I'm not sure if a bug was opened for the other ones, but I took care of the one that I look after. Cheers, Bruce

I spend all day every day working with targets across the spectrum of arch and use case, with plenty of drivers and core infrastructure in common, so those sorts of changes being monitored and being

Hi Bruce, Let me turn this question back at you then: is Yocto going to be doing thorough Q&A for all of these HW platforms? Decent Q&A is what really sets Yocto apart, and what makes it my first

Attendees: Josh, Sean, Jessica, ScottG, Mark, Darren, Denys, Jefro, Beth, Jeff, Matthew, Laurentiu, Michael, Bruce, Chris Larson, Ciby, Song   Agenda * Opens collection - 5 min (Song) * 1.2.1 update

I would be interested, but ideally have to do it out of working hours. I'm uk-based, so I would prefer it to be outside of 08:00 to 16:30 UTC. If that's not possible, then I can try and arrange some

That's certainly the way I'm trying to go. I would like to see a full-feature BSP as the 'default' for the board that can easily be customized to reduce the size / boot times for 'full embedded' use.

I'll jump in and ask my obvious question, if we want to pull in some extra BSP/kernel developers, is there a fundamental reason why a different kernel/kernel version than one of the linux-yocto ones

sure interested I have quite a few commitments on Thursday (oe hacking is not my day job) but pulling everyone together sounds like a very good idea. I'll try and make a meeting if someone else wants

https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.3_Status#Milestone_1

There do seem to be multiple efforts. The Qt on Pi folks are also putting together a BSP. I'd like to find a way to put everyone together to make sure effort is not being duplicated. Is there interest

Hi Tomas, If anyone wants to pitch in with patches that would be great. There is also a little more information on the layer from a post of mine a few weeks back -

The new download mirror is now active. Fetching from downloads.yoctoproject.org should be reliable once again. Michael Halstead Yocto Project / Sys Admin

Apologies for the massive cross-post, but most users don't read the development lists :) To avoid 'reply all' mistakes the addressed lists are in BCC. In case you are wondering which lists: the

I got the feeling that there might be multiple OE/RPI efforts going on at the same time unaware of each other, e.g., I noticed this meta-raspberrypi layer on github that seems to be well on the

We are experiencing download mirror instability that began with a DDOS on Friday. Since then the network configuration attached to the mirror server has been in flux. This caused several outages.

interesting. This is gcc puking with some insane inline assembly. Can you post preprocessed pktgen.c and cmdline arguments used to compile it ? and is it using gcc 4.7 or 4.6 ?

Dear Elizabeth, In message <CAPhnLPDzcwr+0uMFk274KKtfbGD48-z5yQDqD=JozLO0jA9QRA@...> you wrote: Should I create an entry in the bug database? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX

Yes, GPL is somewhat meaningless so these should be audited to determine the correct GPL version and corrected. -b -- Elizabeth Flanagan Yocto Project Build and Release