|
Re: Conf for a single recipe only
If you took go recipes from master, then try building mender from
master as well, by setting up a master build. If that works fine, then
you need to figure out how to backport mender as a whole, or
If you took go recipes from master, then try building mender from
master as well, by setting up a master build. If that works fine, then
you need to figure out how to backport mender as a whole, or
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57739
·
|
|
Re: BBClass function and symbolic link (symlink) ... I throw in the towel
#kirkstone
#python
#bitbake
Probably, I don't really know but when I comment the "ln -s" line, using a #, the compilation works. Only the "ln -s" lines
Probably, I don't really know but when I comment the "ln -s" line, using a #, the compilation works. Only the "ln -s" lines
|
By
Martin Leduc <martin.leduc@...>
·
#57738
·
|
|
poky-dunfell-23.0.17
I wanted to do a simple test with dunfell, my system meets all the minimum requirements based on documentation, and I am running under centos7…
I downloaded poky-dunfell-23.0.17, built both
I wanted to do a simple test with dunfell, my system meets all the minimum requirements based on documentation, and I am running under centos7…
I downloaded poky-dunfell-23.0.17, built both
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#57737
·
|
|
Re: BBClass function and symbolic link (symlink) ... I throw in the towel
#kirkstone
#python
#bitbake
Your set version function looks like it's running from the logs, so
don't think your function is directly causing a problem. My guess is
something else later is crashing or something else unrelated?
Your set version function looks like it's running from the logs, so
don't think your function is directly causing a problem. My guess is
something else later is crashing or something else unrelated?
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#57736
·
|
|
Re: BBClass function and symbolic link (symlink) ... I throw in the towel
#kirkstone
#python
#bitbake
Hi Joshua,
I've founded a second function, in the same class, using ln -s
set_log_folder () {
bbplain "Set var log folder BEGIN"
rm -Rf ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/var/log
ln -s
Hi Joshua,
I've founded a second function, in the same class, using ln -s
set_log_folder () {
bbplain "Set var log folder BEGIN"
rm -Rf ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/var/log
ln -s
|
By
Martin Leduc <martin.leduc@...>
·
#57735
·
|
|
Yocto Project Status 02 August 2022 (WW31)
Current Dev Position: YP 4.1 M3
Next Deadline: 22nd August 2022 YP 4.1 M3 Build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday August 4th 7:30 am PDT
Current Dev Position: YP 4.1 M3
Next Deadline: 22nd August 2022 YP 4.1 M3 Build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday August 4th 7:30 am PDT
|
By
Neal Caidin
·
#57734
·
|
|
Re: Conf for a single recipe only
Thanks, that seems like a good hint.
Regarding the fixing: As I said it seems as this is a bug in golang itself. Correct me if I'm wrong but here is the output from building
Thanks, that seems like a good hint.
Regarding the fixing: As I said it seems as this is a bug in golang itself. Correct me if I'm wrong but here is the output from building
|
By
Sebastian Rühl
·
#57733
·
|
|
Re: BBClass function and symbolic link (symlink) ... I throw in the towel
#kirkstone
#python
#bitbake
Hi Joshua,
Thank you for your quick reply.
Please see the crash log in the attachment.
"Also, I'm not quite clear what you mean by "works like a charm with Warrior"; it sounds like something
Hi Joshua,
Thank you for your quick reply.
Please see the crash log in the attachment.
"Also, I'm not quite clear what you mean by "works like a charm with Warrior"; it sounds like something
|
By
Martin Leduc <martin.leduc@...>
·
#57732
·
|
|
Re: Conf for a single recipe only
There's no way to build two versions of the same component, if the
versions share the recipe name. You have to fix the application, or
try to rename one set of the go recipes so it is separate from
There's no way to build two versions of the same component, if the
versions share the recipe name. You have to fix the application, or
try to rename one set of the go recipes so it is separate from
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57731
·
|
|
Re: BBClass function and symbolic link (symlink) ... I throw in the towel
#kirkstone
#python
#bitbake
<martin.leduc=luminator.com@...> wrote:
Can you provide a little more detail about how it crashes? Also, I'm
not quite clear what you mean by "works like a charm with Warrior";
<martin.leduc=luminator.com@...> wrote:
Can you provide a little more detail about how it crashes? Also, I'm
not quite clear what you mean by "works like a charm with Warrior";
|
By
Joshua Watt
·
#57730
·
|
|
BBClass function and symbolic link (symlink) ... I throw in the towel
#kirkstone
#python
#bitbake
Hi team,
Well, I throw in the towel. But it's looks like so simple .... for me 🤣🤣.
I've a function to replace the version file in /etc/version. This function is integrated into my
Hi team,
Well, I throw in the towel. But it's looks like so simple .... for me 🤣🤣.
I've a function to replace the version file in /etc/version. This function is integrated into my
|
By
Martin Leduc <martin.leduc@...>
·
#57729
·
|
|
Compare between two yocto builds of same SDK and target which have generated at two different time
#yocto
#linux
#bitbake
#llvm
#distro
I have generated two yocto builds at different times while taking the same SDK and target. So is there any way to verify yocto builds so I could differentiate between them for their timestamp, date
I have generated two yocto builds at different times while taking the same SDK and target. So is there any way to verify yocto builds so I could differentiate between them for their timestamp, date
|
By
Nikita Gupta
·
#57728
·
|
|
Conf for a single recipe only
Is there a way to set the GOVERSION for a single recipe only?
At the moment I set the Golang version to 1.18 using the recipes from master (on a local dunfell branch) and set the go version in the
Is there a way to set the GOVERSION for a single recipe only?
At the moment I set the Golang version to 1.18 using the recipes from master (on a local dunfell branch) and set the go version in the
|
By
Sebastian Rühl
·
#57727
·
|
|
[layerindex-web][PATCH] utils.py: Use get_layer_var() to get BBFILE_COLLECTIONS
The commit 38e6288c7dad579518b0de2b6664f23be58889b6 has added oe-core to
BBLAYERS by default, and then there will be mutliple BBFILE_COLLECTIONS and
caused update.py failed to update layers (most of
The commit 38e6288c7dad579518b0de2b6664f23be58889b6 has added oe-core to
BBLAYERS by default, and then there will be mutliple BBFILE_COLLECTIONS and
caused update.py failed to update layers (most of
|
By
Robert Yang
·
#57726
·
|
|
M+ & H bugs with Milestone Movements WW31
All,
YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW31 are listed below:
Priority
Bug ID
Short Description
Changer
Owner
Was
Became
Medium+
14800
AB-INT PTEST: libgcrypt ptest
All,
YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW31 are listed below:
Priority
Bug ID
Short Description
Changer
Owner
Was
Became
Medium+
14800
AB-INT PTEST: libgcrypt ptest
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#57725
·
|
|
Enhancements/Bugs closed WW31!
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
ross.burton@...
1
mhalstead@...
1
Grand Total
2
Thanks,
Stephen K. Jolley
Yocto Project
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
ross.burton@...
1
mhalstead@...
1
Grand Total
2
Thanks,
Stephen K. Jolley
Yocto Project
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#57724
·
|
|
Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 4.1
All,
Below is the list as of top 37 bug owners as of the end of WW31 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 4.1. There are 62 possible work days left until the final
All,
Below is the list as of top 37 bug owners as of the end of WW31 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 4.1. There are 62 possible work days left until the final
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#57723
·
|
|
Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#57722
·
|
|
Re: Confused as to why runtime variables (RDEPENDS, RPROVIDES, etc) require package name overrides
It doesn't have anything to do with parsing. A single bitbake recipe will write multiple binary packages by splitting up its files, so each binary package it writes has its own metadata.--
It doesn't have anything to do with parsing. A single bitbake recipe will write multiple binary packages by splitting up its files, so each binary package it writes has its own metadata.--
|
By
kergoth@...
·
#57721
·
|
|
Confused as to why runtime variables (RDEPENDS, RPROVIDES, etc) require package name overrides
Essentially I don't understand why variables like RDEPENDS require a package name conditional override such as "RDEPENDS_${PN}" while other variables, including DEPENDS, do not require this. Isn't
Essentially I don't understand why variables like RDEPENDS require a package name conditional override such as "RDEPENDS_${PN}" while other variables, including DEPENDS, do not require this. Isn't
|
By
brownij6@...
·
#57720
·
|