|
Enhancements/Bugs closed WW31!
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
ross.burton@...
1
mhalstead@...
1
Grand Total
2
Thanks,
Stephen K. Jolley
Yocto Project
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
ross.burton@...
1
mhalstead@...
1
Grand Total
2
Thanks,
Stephen K. Jolley
Yocto Project
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#57724
·
|
|
Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 4.1
All,
Below is the list as of top 37 bug owners as of the end of WW31 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 4.1. There are 62 possible work days left until the final
All,
Below is the list as of top 37 bug owners as of the end of WW31 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 4.1. There are 62 possible work days left until the final
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#57723
·
|
|
Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#57722
·
|
|
Re: Confused as to why runtime variables (RDEPENDS, RPROVIDES, etc) require package name overrides
It doesn't have anything to do with parsing. A single bitbake recipe will write multiple binary packages by splitting up its files, so each binary package it writes has its own metadata.--
It doesn't have anything to do with parsing. A single bitbake recipe will write multiple binary packages by splitting up its files, so each binary package it writes has its own metadata.--
|
By
kergoth@...
·
#57721
·
|
|
Confused as to why runtime variables (RDEPENDS, RPROVIDES, etc) require package name overrides
Essentially I don't understand why variables like RDEPENDS require a package name conditional override such as "RDEPENDS_${PN}" while other variables, including DEPENDS, do not require this. Isn't
Essentially I don't understand why variables like RDEPENDS require a package name conditional override such as "RDEPENDS_${PN}" while other variables, including DEPENDS, do not require this. Isn't
|
By
brownij6@...
·
#57720
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 2/2] packagegroup-core-security: remove krill for some archs
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-core/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57719
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 1/2] krill: only builds on x86/x86-64 and arm64
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-security/krill/krill_0.9.6.bb | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
recipes-security/krill/krill_0.9.6.bb | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57718
·
|
|
Re: nftables_0.7 not working
Hi Maik,
No, you would indeed need to enable those in your kernel config.
Cheers,
Quentin
Hi Maik,
No, you would indeed need to enable those in your kernel config.
Cheers,
Quentin
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#57717
·
|
|
Re: nftables_0.7 not working
Hi Quentin,
Thank you for your response!
I added kernel-modules to the IMAGE_INSTALL_append, but it seems that the modules are still not being loaded.
Is that the correct way?
Also I see that
Hi Quentin,
Thank you for your response!
I added kernel-modules to the IMAGE_INSTALL_append, but it seems that the modules are still not being loaded.
Is that the correct way?
Also I see that
|
By
Maik Vermeulen
·
#57716
·
|
|
Re: nftables_0.7 not working
Hi Maik,
It seems you built many netfilter features/drivers as modules and not built-in in the kernel. When that is the case, you need to add the modules to your image because Yocto does not do it
Hi Maik,
It seems you built many netfilter features/drivers as modules and not built-in in the kernel. When that is the case, you need to add the modules to your image because Yocto does not do it
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#57715
·
|
|
error building core-image-full-cmdline image on kirkstone for powerpc 64 (meta-freescale, t1024rdb-64b machine)
Hi everyone,
I get some errors when I build “core-image-full-cmdline” fort1024rdb-64bmachine. I fix the error then I get another one, so I wonder if anybody has seen these errors or if
Hi everyone,
I get some errors when I build “core-image-full-cmdline” fort1024rdb-64bmachine. I fix the error then I get another one, so I wonder if anybody has seen these errors or if
|
By
Sona Sarmadi (ssarmadi) <ssarmadi@...>
·
#57714
·
|
|
nftables_0.7 not working
Hi,
I added the following to our image recipe:
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " nftables"
When running that image, nftables seems to be included, but we get the following error:
~#
Hi,
I added the following to our image recipe:
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " nftables"
When running that image, nftables seems to be included, but we get the following error:
~#
|
By
Maik Vermeulen
·
#57713
·
|
|
Re: Re : rdepends upon non-existent task do_package_write_deb
Thanks for your valuable reply .
I followed the procedure which you have mentioned i.e added IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " go.opentelemetry.io-proto-otlp" in local.conf file. After that I am getting this
Thanks for your valuable reply .
I followed the procedure which you have mentioned i.e added IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " go.opentelemetry.io-proto-otlp" in local.conf file. After that I am getting this
|
By
Poornesh G ( India - Bangalore )
·
#57712
·
|
|
Re: os-release change - build failure
#bitbake
#os-release
Use exiting DATETIME variable and add it to vardepsexclude if it isn't
already there.
Use exiting DATETIME variable and add it to vardepsexclude if it isn't
already there.
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#57711
·
|
|
os-release change - build failure
#bitbake
#os-release
Hi All,
I made below change in recipes-core/os-release/os-release.bbappend. It results in build failure. Please give me pointers to resolve the issue.
I deleted build/cache and build/sstate-cache. But
Hi All,
I made below change in recipes-core/os-release/os-release.bbappend. It results in build failure. Please give me pointers to resolve the issue.
I deleted build/cache and build/sstate-cache. But
|
By
Gangadhar N
·
#57710
·
|
|
[meta-security][v2][PATCH] lkrg: update to 0.9.4
drop Makefile fixup patch. Use sed instead
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM update do to yr update
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
V2]
Add LIC_FILES_CHKSUM change reason
---
drop Makefile fixup patch. Use sed instead
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM update do to yr update
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
V2]
Add LIC_FILES_CHKSUM change reason
---
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57709
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] lkrg: update to 0.9.4
drop Makefile fixup patch. Use sed instead
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../lkrg/files/makefile_cleanup.patch | 53 -------------------
...g-module_0.9.3.bb =>
drop Makefile fixup patch. Use sed instead
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../lkrg/files/makefile_cleanup.patch | 53 -------------------
...g-module_0.9.3.bb =>
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57708
·
|
|
comparison between two build of different times
#sdk
#toolchain
#ubuntu
#yocto
#linux
Hello Everyone,
I have generated two build with different platform for same target (core-image-minimal) and for same yocto release "dunfell" . One image I have generated with the help of yocto
Hello Everyone,
I have generated two build with different platform for same target (core-image-minimal) and for same yocto release "dunfell" . One image I have generated with the help of yocto
|
By
Nikita Gupta
·
#57707
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 4/4] swtpm: update to 0.7.3
drop musl patch.Fix another way
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../recipes-tpm/swtpm/files/ioctl_h.patch | 22 -------------------
.../swtpm/{swtpm_0.7.1.bb =>
drop musl patch.Fix another way
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
.../recipes-tpm/swtpm/files/ioctl_h.patch | 22 -------------------
.../swtpm/{swtpm_0.7.1.bb =>
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57706
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 3/4] ibmswtpm2: update to 1682
fixes openssl 3.0 support
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmswtpm2/files/tune-makefile.patch | 5 +++--
.../ibmswtpm2/{ibmswtpm2_1661.bb =>
fixes openssl 3.0 support
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/ibmswtpm2/files/tune-makefile.patch | 5 +++--
.../ibmswtpm2/{ibmswtpm2_1661.bb =>
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57705
·
|