|
[meta-tpm][PATCH 5/5] oeqa/tpm2: fix and cleanup tests
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/tpm2.py | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/tpm2.py | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57223
·
|
|
[meta-tpm][PATCH 4/5] oeqa/swtpm: add swtpm runtime
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/swtpm.py | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/swtpm.py | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57222
·
|
|
[meta-tpm][PATCH 3/5] swtpm: enable gnutls
needed for cert support
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/swtpm/swtpm_0.7.1.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
needed for cert support
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/swtpm/swtpm_0.7.1.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57221
·
|
|
[meta-tpm][PATCH 2/5] security-tpm2-image: add swtpm
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/recipes-core/images/security-tpm2-image.bb | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/recipes-core/images/security-tpm2-image.bb | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57220
·
|
|
[meta-tpm][PATCH 1/5] swtpm: enable seccomp if DISTRO is enabled
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/swtpm/swtpm_0.7.1.bb | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/swtpm/swtpm_0.7.1.bb
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...>
---
meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/swtpm/swtpm_0.7.1.bb | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm/swtpm/swtpm_0.7.1.bb
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#57219
·
|
|
Re: running application in user mode instead of root
#yocto
Hi,
You can use start-stop-daemon command with "--chiud" parameter. Here is an
Hi,
You can use start-stop-daemon command with "--chiud" parameter. Here is an
|
By
Anton Antonov
·
#57218
·
|
|
Re: How to modify an existing file from an optional recipe?
Ok, i will investigate it. Thank you very much!
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
Enviado el: lunes, 30 de mayo de 2022 14:41
Para: Cardenas Jose Antonio
Ok, i will investigate it. Thank you very much!
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@...>
Enviado el: lunes, 30 de mayo de 2022 14:41
Para: Cardenas Jose Antonio
|
By
Cardenas Jose Antonio (JCARDENA)
·
#57217
·
|
|
Re: How to modify an existing file from an optional recipe?
Then you should look at something like ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND,
which runs an extensible set of functions after the rootfs for a
target image has been formed through package install in
Then you should look at something like ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND,
which runs an extensible set of functions after the rootfs for a
target image has been formed through package install in
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57216
·
|
|
Re: How to modify an existing file from an optional recipe?
I can't. The file that i'm trying to modify is a configuration file of a service that is built with its recipe and in my "optional" recipe what i'm trying to do is change a parameter of that
I can't. The file that i'm trying to modify is a configuration file of a service that is built with its recipe and in my "optional" recipe what i'm trying to do is change a parameter of that
|
By
Cardenas Jose Antonio (JCARDENA)
·
#57215
·
|
|
Re: How to modify an existing file from an optional recipe?
I'd say it's better to modify the original recipe, can you do that?
Alex
<JoseAntonio.Cardenas@...> wrote:
I'd say it's better to modify the original recipe, can you do that?
Alex
<JoseAntonio.Cardenas@...> wrote:
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57214
·
|
|
Re: How to modify an existing file from an optional recipe?
Yes, indeed. It's a hack to be able to run some tests. Does the "image post processing task" that you comment related with SDK_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND?
Regards.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Alexander
Yes, indeed. It's a hack to be able to run some tests. Does the "image post processing task" that you comment related with SDK_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND?
Regards.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Alexander
|
By
Cardenas Jose Antonio (JCARDENA)
·
#57213
·
|
|
Re: How to modify an existing file from an optional recipe?
You can do this with a postinst scriptlet, or with an image post
processing task, but generally this looks like a hack regardless of
how you do it. What is the file for, and why does it need to
You can do this with a postinst scriptlet, or with an image post
processing task, but generally this looks like a hack regardless of
how you do it. What is the file for, and why does it need to
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57212
·
|
|
How to modify an existing file from an optional recipe?
Hi all,
I have a recipe that is built only with the SDK that modifies the content of an existing file in the rootfs by doing “install -m 644 ${WORKDIR}/my_file ${D}${sysconfdir}/my_file” but
Hi all,
I have a recipe that is built only with the SDK that modifies the content of an existing file in the rootfs by doing “install -m 644 ${WORKDIR}/my_file ${D}${sysconfdir}/my_file” but
|
By
Cardenas Jose Antonio (JCARDENA)
·
#57211
·
|
|
Re: running application in user mode instead of root
#yocto
any one has example bitbake script which runs the application by the user instead of root.
When i start the application using startup scripts [init.d] its running with root user.
any one has example bitbake script which runs the application by the user instead of root.
When i start the application using startup scripts [init.d] its running with root user.
|
By
mail2uvijay@...
·
#57210
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH] zephyr-kernel/2.7: update to release tag Zephyr v2.7.2
6dd320f791 release: update v2.7.2 release notes
ecac165d36 logging: shell: fix shell stats null pointer dereference
132d90d1bc tests/bluetooth/tester: Refactor Read UUID callback
58356313ac coredump:
6dd320f791 release: update v2.7.2 release notes
ecac165d36 logging: shell: fix shell stats null pointer dereference
132d90d1bc tests/bluetooth/tester: Refactor Read UUID callback
58356313ac coredump:
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#57209
·
|
|
[PATCH] patch.py: make sure that patches/series file exists before quilt pop
* Since quilt upgrade to 0.67 some recipes sometimes fail in do_patch with
errors like:
ERROR: Applying patch 'GPLv2.patch' on target directory
* Since quilt upgrade to 0.67 some recipes sometimes fail in do_patch with
errors like:
ERROR: Applying patch 'GPLv2.patch' on target directory
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#57208
·
|
|
Re: meta-egl failure: Nothing RPROVIDES polkit
[snip]
For an immediate fix I've moved the polkit addition to a bbappend added
via BBFILES_DYNAMIC, gated on meta-oe presence. The current intent is
that the meta-agl-core test on the autobuilder
[snip]
For an immediate fix I've moved the polkit addition to a bbappend added
via BBFILES_DYNAMIC, gated on meta-oe presence. The current intent is
that the meta-agl-core test on the autobuilder
|
By
Scott Murray
·
#57207
·
|
|
Re: meta-egl failure: Nothing RPROVIDES polkit
polkit needs to be in DISTRO_FEATURES and the recipe needs to have a check for that (and inherit features_check)
polkit needs to be in DISTRO_FEATURES and the recipe needs to have a check for that (and inherit features_check)
|
By
Tim Orling
·
#57206
·
|
|
Re: meta-egl failure: Nothing RPROVIDES polkit
Hi !
Yes, we need to look into this and likely change the location of the RDEPENDS.
Thanks for flagging.
Best regards,
Jan-Simon
------
Jan-Simon Möller
AGL Release Manager
The Linux
Hi !
Yes, we need to look into this and likely change the location of the RDEPENDS.
Thanks for flagging.
Best regards,
Jan-Simon
------
Jan-Simon Möller
AGL Release Manager
The Linux
|
By
Jan Simon Moeller <jsmoeller@...>
·
#57205
·
|
|
Re: host file contamination with recipes using cmake and find_package
Hi,
To me this looks wrong. If CMake is used and toolchain.cmake variables not overwritten,
the sysroot path is set and openssl will be found from default system include
directories inside sysroot
Hi,
To me this looks wrong. If CMake is used and toolchain.cmake variables not overwritten,
the sysroot path is set and openssl will be found from default system include
directories inside sysroot
|
By
Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...>
·
#57204
·
|