Hi all, This is the full report for yocto-4.0.rc1: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults ======= Summary ======== No high milestone

Hello, I've already noticed this behaviour on dunfell and I have a reproducer: ninvaders.inc: --- DESCRIPTION = "Space invaders clone based on nCurses" HOMEPAGE =

Current Dev Position: YP 4.0 rc2 Next Deadline: 29th April 2022 YP 4.0 final release Next Team Meetings: Bug Triage meeting Thursday Apr.14th 7:30 am PDT

Thank you so much! That was the problem!

I've ended up removing the wrong arch binaries and ignoring the stripped ones. Unfortunately I have no idea on where to start to rebuild the binaries using the cross toolchain, everything seems to be

Can you reproduce this against something in OE-Core which has a similar set of patches? We really need to be able to reproduce the problem. Cheers, Richard

I think that I am not allowed to publish the code, but I can try to explain what I have done. 1. There were in total 8 patches before I started to work 2. Run: devtool modify linux-ttc 3. I applied

It's hard to say anything without seeing the recipe and the patches. Can you publish them somewhere? Alex

The error is about not being able to find pkg-config executable, so you need to inherit pkgconfig in the recipe. It helps if you publish the layer somewhere instead of attaching it to the email. Alex

There are no attachments though. Alex

Hello, I'm having real difficulties in compiling a Rust app that uses gtk3 (this app successfully builds and runs on my host machine). I'm on the master branch of poky, using rust 1.59. Is this still

Hi and thank you for your reply. Please find all the necessary info in the attachments: a) Output from command: "bitbake rg" in file rg.bb_compile_error <- rg is a recipe with the rust application b)

Greetings, I am using devtool and I noticed something that smells like bug, maybe I am wrong. I am trying to modify some recipe and there are already 8 patches. When I do “devtool finish <recipe>

Hi, Thanks for the advice. I am right now unsure how to solve it since I am on thud but I will continue to work on this so once I get this done and I have a solution that works I will try and

Hi all, I'm on Dunfell [1] and just can't get LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE [2] to work right. I'd like to use it to get 'os-release-lic' onto my image. I don't want to install the license packages of *all*

For honister the syntax would be: INSANE_SKIP:${PN} as the override change applies there. Cheers, Richard

As already pointed out on IRC, the only real solution is: a) removing the shipped binaries from the install (as Khem also mentioned) and b) making the module re-build the binaries using the

I'm seeing some gaps and performance issues. Examples: 1. Setting NPM_INSTALL_DEV = "1" I am rewarded with: 169npm ERR! Could not install from

From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...> After bind upgrade to 9.18.x, the below change introduced [1], all supported libraries have accompanying .pc files now. ba2376b9e0 Update and cleanup the

From: Hitendra Prajapati <hprajapati@...> Source: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd MR: 114189 Type: Security Fix Disposition: Backport from