|
Re: [meta-selinux][dunfell][PATCH] samhain.inc: Correct LICENSE to GPL-2.0-only
Hi there,
This is for meta-security and not for meta-selinux. Also for the master branch.
corrected labels and sent another patch for the meta-security master branch. Please ignore this
Hi there,
This is for meta-security and not for meta-selinux. Also for the master branch.
corrected labels and sent another patch for the meta-security master branch. Please ignore this
|
By
Ranjitsinh Rathod
·
#56758
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.rc1)
Thanks!
14779 means we'll need an rc2. Do you have any information on whether
14782/14783 also occur in qemu images or are they just on the nuc hardware? Do
you know if anyone is looking into them
Thanks!
14779 means we'll need an rc2. Do you have any information on whether
14782/14783 also occur in qemu images or are they just on the nuc hardware? Do
you know if anyone is looking into them
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#56757
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] samhain.inc: Correct LICENSE to GPL-2.0-only
It seems below change done manually and so LICENSE variable modified
from GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-or-later. But it should be GPL-2.0-only
Link:
It seems below change done manually and so LICENSE variable modified
from GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-or-later. But it should be GPL-2.0-only
Link:
|
By
Ranjitsinh Rathod
·
#56756
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][dunfell][PATCH] samhain.inc: Correct LICENSE to GPL-2.0-only
It seems below change done manually and so LICENSE variable modified
from GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-or-later. But it should be GPL-2.0-only
Link:
It seems below change done manually and so LICENSE variable modified
from GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-or-later. But it should be GPL-2.0-only
Link:
|
By
Ranjitsinh Rathod
·
#56755
·
|
|
Re: QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.rc1)
Hi all,
This is the full report for yocto-4.0.rc1:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults
======= Summary ========
No high milestone
Hi all,
This is the full report for yocto-4.0.rc1:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults
======= Summary ========
No high milestone
|
By
Teoh, Jay Shen
·
#56754
·
|
|
Re: Devtool
Hello,
I've already noticed this behaviour on dunfell and I have a reproducer:
ninvaders.inc:
---
DESCRIPTION = "Space invaders clone based on nCurses"
HOMEPAGE =
Hello,
I've already noticed this behaviour on dunfell and I have a reproducer:
ninvaders.inc:
---
DESCRIPTION = "Space invaders clone based on nCurses"
HOMEPAGE =
|
By
Alexandre Belloni
·
#56753
·
|
|
Yocto Project Status WW15`22
Current Dev Position: YP 4.0 rc2
Next Deadline: 29th April 2022 YP 4.0 final release
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Apr.14th 7:30 am PDT
Current Dev Position: YP 4.0 rc2
Next Deadline: 29th April 2022 YP 4.0 final release
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Apr.14th 7:30 am PDT
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#56752
·
|
|
Re: Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
Thank you so much! That was the problem!
Thank you so much! That was the problem!
|
By
Alessandro Tagliapietra
·
#56751
·
|
|
Re: Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
I've ended up removing the wrong arch binaries and ignoring the stripped ones.
Unfortunately I have no idea on where to start to rebuild the binaries using the cross toolchain, everything seems to be
I've ended up removing the wrong arch binaries and ignoring the stripped ones.
Unfortunately I have no idea on where to start to rebuild the binaries using the cross toolchain, everything seems to be
|
By
Alessandro Tagliapietra
·
#56750
·
|
|
Re: Devtool
Can you reproduce this against something in OE-Core which has a similar set of
patches?
We really need to be able to reproduce the problem.
Cheers,
Richard
Can you reproduce this against something in OE-Core which has a similar set of
patches?
We really need to be able to reproduce the problem.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#56749
·
|
|
Re: Devtool
I think that I am not allowed to publish the code, but I can try to explain what I have done.
1. There were in total 8 patches before I started to work
2. Run: devtool modify linux-ttc
3. I applied
I think that I am not allowed to publish the code, but I can try to explain what I have done.
1. There were in total 8 patches before I started to work
2. Run: devtool modify linux-ttc
3. I applied
|
By
Vanja Žerić
·
#56748
·
|
|
Re: Devtool
It's hard to say anything without seeing the recipe and the patches.
Can you publish them somewhere?
Alex
It's hard to say anything without seeing the recipe and the patches.
Can you publish them somewhere?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#56747
·
|
|
Re: Building core-image-weston/x11 with custom rust/gtk3 app
The error is about not being able to find pkg-config executable, so you need to inherit pkgconfig in the recipe.
It helps if you publish the layer somewhere instead of attaching it to the email.
Alex
The error is about not being able to find pkg-config executable, so you need to inherit pkgconfig in the recipe.
It helps if you publish the layer somewhere instead of attaching it to the email.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#56746
·
|
|
Re: Building a core-image-weston with custom app using rust and gtk3
There are no attachments though.
Alex
There are no attachments though.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#56745
·
|
|
Building core-image-weston/x11 with custom rust/gtk3 app
Hello,
I'm having real difficulties in compiling a Rust app that uses gtk3 (this app successfully builds and runs on my host machine). I'm on the master branch of poky, using rust 1.59.
Is this still
Hello,
I'm having real difficulties in compiling a Rust app that uses gtk3 (this app successfully builds and runs on my host machine). I'm on the master branch of poky, using rust 1.59.
Is this still
|
By
Artur Czajkowski <atch.cpp@...>
·
#56744
·
|
|
Re: Building a core-image-weston with custom app using rust and gtk3
Hi and thank you for your reply.
Please find all the necessary info in the attachments:
a) Output from command: "bitbake rg" in file rg.bb_compile_error <- rg is a recipe with the rust application
b)
Hi and thank you for your reply.
Please find all the necessary info in the attachments:
a) Output from command: "bitbake rg" in file rg.bb_compile_error <- rg is a recipe with the rust application
b)
|
By
Artur Czajkowski <atch.cpp@...>
·
#56743
·
|
|
Devtool
Greetings,
I am using devtool and I noticed something that smells like bug, maybe I am wrong. I am trying to modify some recipe and there are already 8 patches. When I do “devtool finish <recipe>
Greetings,
I am using devtool and I noticed something that smells like bug, maybe I am wrong. I am trying to modify some recipe and there are already 8 patches. When I do “devtool finish <recipe>
|
By
Vanja Žerić
·
#56742
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
Hi,
Thanks for the advice. I am right now unsure how to solve it since I
am on thud but I will continue to work on this so once I get this done
and I have a solution that works I will try and
Hi,
Thanks for the advice. I am right now unsure how to solve it since I
am on thud but I will continue to work on this so once I get this done
and I have a solution that works I will try and
|
By
Mans Zigher <mans.zigher@...>
·
#56741
·
|
|
LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE not working properly
Hi all,
I'm on Dunfell [1] and just can't get LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE [2] to work right. I'd like to use it to get 'os-release-lic' onto my image. I don't want to install the license packages of *all*
Hi all,
I'm on Dunfell [1] and just can't get LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE [2] to work right. I'd like to use it to get 'os-release-lic' onto my image. I don't want to install the license packages of *all*
|
By
Manuel Wagesreither
·
#56740
·
|
|
Re: Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
For honister the syntax would be:
INSANE_SKIP:${PN}
as the override change applies there.
Cheers,
Richard
For honister the syntax would be:
INSANE_SKIP:${PN}
as the override change applies there.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#56739
·
|