|
Re: Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
Ok then next thing you want to check is where the reported stripped file is located and even if it does not work then perhaps look into removing these files if they are not needed
Ok then next thing you want to check is where the reported stripped file is located and even if it does not work then perhaps look into removing these files if they are not needed
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#56725
·
|
|
Re: Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
The ones I've added in the INSANE_SKIP
ls -lah /home/alex/Projects/yocto/build/tmp/work/cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4-poky-linux-gnueabi/node-red-node-serialport/1.0.1-r0/packages-split
total 32K
drwxr-xr-x
The ones I've added in the INSANE_SKIP
ls -lah /home/alex/Projects/yocto/build/tmp/work/cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4-poky-linux-gnueabi/node-red-node-serialport/1.0.1-r0/packages-split
total 32K
drwxr-xr-x
|
By
Alessandro Tagliapietra
·
#56724
·
|
|
Re: Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
<tagliapietra.alessandro@...> wrote:
what package folders do you see under packages-split/ folder in your
build area for this recipe ?
<tagliapietra.alessandro@...> wrote:
what package folders do you see under packages-split/ folder in your
build area for this recipe ?
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#56723
·
|
|
Re: Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
Thank you for helping!
The package is node-red-node-serialport, it doesn't seem to create child packages for the dependencies, the nodejs deps only reside in the package node-modules folder.
The
Thank you for helping!
The package is node-red-node-serialport, it doesn't seem to create child packages for the dependencies, the nodejs deps only reside in the package node-modules folder.
The
|
By
Alessandro Tagliapietra
·
#56722
·
|
|
Re: Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
The prebuilds are for other architectures. so perhaps you can rm them
in a do_install_append() or if they are really needed
you perhaps would also need INSANE_SKIP_<name of package> = "arch"
The prebuilds are for other architectures. so perhaps you can rm them
in a do_install_append() or if they are really needed
you perhaps would also need INSANE_SKIP_<name of package> = "arch"
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#56721
·
|
|
Re: Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
Alessandro Tagliapietra <tagliapietra.alessandro@...> escreveu no dia segunda, 11/04/2022 à(s) 17:13:
Hi Alessandro,
This is because the package that you are building is already compiled and there
Alessandro Tagliapietra <tagliapietra.alessandro@...> escreveu no dia segunda, 11/04/2022 à(s) 17:13:
Hi Alessandro,
This is because the package that you are building is already compiled and there
|
By
Jose Quaresma
·
#56720
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
This will be valiant effort but my advice is don't go alone if you
want to undertake this
SOC sdks have lot of nitty gritty issues that will pop up along the
way and unless you
have someone from SOC
This will be valiant effort but my advice is don't go alone if you
want to undertake this
SOC sdks have lot of nitty gritty issues that will pop up along the
way and unless you
have someone from SOC
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#56719
·
|
|
Skipping already-stripped check doesn't work
I've created an npm package recipe for node-red-node-serialport using
devtool add "npm://registry.npmjs.org;package=node-red-node-serialport;version=1.0.1"
which generated this recipe.
The problem is
I've created an npm package recipe for node-red-node-serialport using
devtool add "npm://registry.npmjs.org;package=node-red-node-serialport;version=1.0.1"
which generated this recipe.
The problem is
|
By
Alessandro Tagliapietra
·
#56718
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
This is my first time working with them so I am learning a lot but
never encountered anything like it. Trying to look into what it would
require to move to a newer version it appears as if they have
This is my first time working with them so I am learning a lot but
never encountered anything like it. Trying to look into what it would
require to move to a newer version it appears as if they have
|
By
Mans Zigher <mans.zigher@...>
·
#56717
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
It's a contracting issue. You need to specify in writing that the
vendor cannot provide ancient Yocto. Otherwise they won't bother.
Alex
It's a contracting issue. You need to specify in writing that the
vendor cannot provide ancient Yocto. Otherwise they won't bother.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#56716
·
|
|
Re: [Question] How to handle GPLv3 packages?
Yes I know. Not sure why QC is stuck on Thud. Even newer releases from
QC for the target that we are working on is stuck at Thud.
Mans
Den fre 8 apr. 2022 kl 18:59 skrev Alexander Kanavin
Yes I know. Not sure why QC is stuck on Thud. Even newer releases from
QC for the target that we are working on is stuck at Thud.
Mans
Den fre 8 apr. 2022 kl 18:59 skrev Alexander Kanavin
|
By
Mans Zigher <mans.zigher@...>
·
#56715
·
|
|
[layerindex][PATCH 4/4] layerindex/utils.py: ignore 'core' in BBFILES_COLLECTIONS
Many layers append BBFILE_COLLECTIONS and therefore have 'core <layer>'
During update.py, this means we are likely not handling the collection we
expect:
WARNING:
Many layers append BBFILE_COLLECTIONS and therefore have 'core <layer>'
During update.py, this means we are likely not handling the collection we
expect:
WARNING:
|
By
Tim Orling
·
#56714
·
|
|
[layerindex][PATCH 3/4] recipe{desc,parse}.py: BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH_ADDITIONS
ERROR: Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE has been renamed to BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH_ADDITIONS
ERROR: Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE from the shell environment has been renamed to BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH_ADDITIONS
ERROR:
ERROR: Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE has been renamed to BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH_ADDITIONS
ERROR: Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE from the shell environment has been renamed to BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH_ADDITIONS
ERROR:
|
By
Tim Orling
·
#56713
·
|
|
[layerindex][PATCH 2/4] layerindex/models.py: add Inactive-Upstream
Add the newish Inactive-Upstream upstream status.
Add 0046_alter_patch_status.py migration.
Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <tim.orling@...>
layerindex/migrations: update patch
Add the newish Inactive-Upstream upstream status.
Add 0046_alter_patch_status.py migration.
Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <tim.orling@...>
layerindex/migrations: update patch
|
By
Tim Orling
·
#56712
·
|
|
[layerindex][PATCH 1/4] layerindex/urls.py: fix about url pattern
The url pattern was not including the trailing /
[YOCTO #14445]
Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <tim.orling@...>
---
layerindex/urls.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
The url pattern was not including the trailing /
[YOCTO #14445]
Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <tim.orling@...>
---
layerindex/urls.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
|
By
Tim Orling
·
#56711
·
|
|
[layerindex][PATCH 0/4] Various fixes
Various fixes to address errors and warnings when running update.py
The following changes since commit 796d2455bb862ed4c71eadfa9fcf4c002752c2f3:
templates/*: staticfiles -> static (2022-01-13
Various fixes to address errors and warnings when running update.py
The following changes since commit 796d2455bb862ed4c71eadfa9fcf4c002752c2f3:
templates/*: staticfiles -> static (2022-01-13
|
By
Tim Orling
·
#56710
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 6/6] tpm2-pkcs11: update to 1.8.0
The build patches are now included in the upstream,
the local binary checkes can be disabled with --disable-ptool-checks,
the boostrap doesn't need to be called if the release .tar.gz is
The build patches are now included in the upstream,
the local binary checkes can be disabled with --disable-ptool-checks,
the boostrap doesn't need to be called if the release .tar.gz is
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56709
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 5/6] tpm2-tss-engine: fix version string and build with openssl 3.0
Calling autoreconf outside git repo causes the version number to
be null. This patch makes the version number fixed.
Since Yocto now uses OpenSSL 3.0, the file packaging need to
be
Calling autoreconf outside git repo causes the version number to
be null. This patch makes the version number fixed.
Since Yocto now uses OpenSSL 3.0, the file packaging need to
be
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56708
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 4/6] tpm2-abrmd: update to 2.4.1
The version number is correctly assigned only when the release .tar.gz
is used.
Signed-off-by: Petr Gotthard <petr.gotthard@...>
---
.../tpm2-abrmd/{tpm2-abrmd_2.4.0.bb =>
The version number is correctly assigned only when the release .tar.gz
is used.
Signed-off-by: Petr Gotthard <petr.gotthard@...>
---
.../tpm2-abrmd/{tpm2-abrmd_2.4.0.bb =>
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56707
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH 3/6] tpm2-tss: update to 3.2.0
This deletes the patches that were unused for a long time,
updates the tpm2-tss package and introduces a fix to the version
number problem that got introduced with the 3.2.0 version.
Signed-off-by:
This deletes the patches that were unused for a long time,
updates the tpm2-tss package and introduces a fix to the version
number problem that got introduced with the 3.2.0 version.
Signed-off-by:
|
By
Petr Gotthard
·
#56706
·
|