|
Re: preempt-rt
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
There are a few details to sort out (like finding a patch compatible with the kernel recipe you want to use, or a compromise of the two),
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
There are a few details to sort out (like finding a patch compatible with the kernel recipe you want to use, or a compromise of the two),
|
By
codusnocturnus
·
#55227
·
|
|
Re: preempt-rt
Cannot…
Generic preempt-rt patch bbappend should be enough…
Cannot…
Generic preempt-rt patch bbappend should be enough…
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#55226
·
|
|
Re: [meta-selinux][dunfell][PATCH 0/3] Fix dunfell build
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:04 AM Jason Andryuk via
lists.yoctoproject.org <jandryuk=gmail.com@...>
wrote:
Ping? I'd like to unbreak meta-selinux dunfell. Other branches may
also
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:04 AM Jason Andryuk via
lists.yoctoproject.org <jandryuk=gmail.com@...>
wrote:
Ping? I'd like to unbreak meta-selinux dunfell. Other branches may
also
|
By
Jason Andryuk
·
#55225
·
|
|
Re: preempt-rt
Hello Steve,
Depends, no mainline kernel? Vendor kernel?
Can you share the machine name? Might be supported already in a layer with -rt.
Regards,
Leon--
--
Leon Woestenberg
leon@...
T: +31 40 711
Hello Steve,
Depends, no mainline kernel? Vendor kernel?
Can you share the machine name? Might be supported already in a layer with -rt.
Regards,
Leon--
--
Leon Woestenberg
leon@...
T: +31 40 711
|
By
Leon Woestenberg
·
#55224
·
|
|
preempt-rt
I have a platform based off a aarm64 Xilinx based kernel, which is not a compliant mainline kernel… so, I will need to go the preemp-rt patch route.
Can you supply an example Yocto recipe that
I have a platform based off a aarm64 Xilinx based kernel, which is not a compliant mainline kernel… so, I will need to go the preemp-rt patch route.
Can you supply an example Yocto recipe that
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#55223
·
|
|
Re: Yocto Unauthenticated git Protocol No Longer Supported
This, I think:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=master-next&id=164bb5e9287497b492f21985dd1a8d85e1a4ed23
Alex
This, I think:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=master-next&id=164bb5e9287497b492f21985dd1a8d85e1a4ed23
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#55222
·
|
|
Re: Yocto Unauthenticated git Protocol No Longer Supported
Thanks. Can you provide links to these patches? I have no choice in using rocko.
Note that the failure was in the do_packagedata task, where it is issuing a 'git -c core.fsyncobjectfiles=0
Thanks. Can you provide links to these patches? I have no choice in using rocko.
Note that the failure was in the do_packagedata task, where it is issuing a 'git -c core.fsyncobjectfiles=0
|
By
Jay Foster
·
#55221
·
|
|
Re: Yocto Unauthenticated git Protocol No Longer Supported
There are patches in master-next for this. You can backport them, but you really shouldn't be using rocko.
Alex
There are patches in master-next for this. You can backport them, but you really shouldn't be using rocko.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#55220
·
|
|
Yocto Unauthenticated git Protocol No Longer Supported
My yocto builds started failing today (November 2, 2021) due to this (https://github.blog/2021-09-01-improving-git-protocol-security-github/#no-more-unauthenticated-git) issue. Is there a fix for
My yocto builds started failing today (November 2, 2021) due to this (https://github.blog/2021-09-01-improving-git-protocol-security-github/#no-more-unauthenticated-git) issue. Is there a fix for
|
By
Jay Foster
·
#55219
·
|
|
Re: yocto preempt-rt
Right, you can either build linux-yocto-rt or the Intel version with
linux-intel-rt. linux-intel tree might have some platform specific
patches that have either been backported or not upstreamed
Right, you can either build linux-yocto-rt or the Intel version with
linux-intel-rt. linux-intel tree might have some platform specific
patches that have either been backported or not upstreamed
|
By
Anuj Mittal
·
#55218
·
|
|
Re: yocto preempt-rt
And adding to that, besides the Yocto maintained kernel, meta-intel
has it's own kernel GIT repo/branch for the kernel and -rt kernel
maintained by Intel.
(There might be some overlap in the
And adding to that, besides the Yocto maintained kernel, meta-intel
has it's own kernel GIT repo/branch for the kernel and -rt kernel
maintained by Intel.
(There might be some overlap in the
|
By
Leon Woestenberg
·
#55217
·
|
|
Re: yocto preempt-rt
Correct.
The rt patches are already integrated on the branches that that recipe will build out of the linux-yocto repository.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness
Correct.
The rt patches are already integrated on the branches that that recipe will build out of the linux-yocto repository.
Bruce
--
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#55216
·
|
|
yocto preempt-rt
Is it true that no patch work is required if out under
…/poky/meta/recipes-kernel, there exists a yocto-linux-rt_##.##.bb recipe that matches your kernel release?, and that it will build the full
Is it true that no patch work is required if out under
…/poky/meta/recipes-kernel, there exists a yocto-linux-rt_##.##.bb recipe that matches your kernel release?, and that it will build the full
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#55215
·
|
|
Yocto Project Status WW43`21
Current Dev Position: YP 3.5 M1
Next Deadline: 6th Dec. 2021 YP 3.5 M1 build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Nov. 4th at 7:30am PDT
Current Dev Position: YP 3.5 M1
Next Deadline: 6th Dec. 2021 YP 3.5 M1 build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Nov. 4th at 7:30am PDT
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#55214
·
|
|
Re: yocto meta-intel preempt-rt
I will check...
Would you have an example of a recipe that shows how to apply the rt path ?
Thanks,
Steve
I will check...
Would you have an example of a recipe that shows how to apply the rt path ?
Thanks,
Steve
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#55213
·
|
|
Re: yocto meta-intel preempt-rt
Hello Steve,
I have been running the PREEMPT_RT for Intel platforms for a few
releases, I remember it fetched sources from a GIT branch for -rt
(PREEMPT_RT). So it does not need to apply separate
Hello Steve,
I have been running the PREEMPT_RT for Intel platforms for a few
releases, I remember it fetched sources from a GIT branch for -rt
(PREEMPT_RT). So it does not need to apply separate
|
By
Leon Woestenberg
·
#55212
·
|
|
yocto meta-intel preempt-rt
I have an Intel based platform, and was looking to implement preempt-rt on it to test.
For Intel, the meta-intel component recipe appears to supports “linux-intel-rt”, and I can build my intel
I have an Intel based platform, and was looking to implement preempt-rt on it to test.
For Intel, the meta-intel component recipe appears to supports “linux-intel-rt”, and I can build my intel
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#55211
·
|
|
Re: #swupdate integration error.
#swupdate
Hi Vishal,
It looks like there is some problem with `u-boot-fw-utils` compilation. Are you
using U-Boot in your system? Which target do you try to build? As you can
Hi Vishal,
It looks like there is some problem with `u-boot-fw-utils` compilation. Are you
using U-Boot in your system? Which target do you try to build? As you can
|
By
tomzy
·
#55210
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH] README.txt: update for honister release
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
README.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.txt b/README.txt
index 5a0ccc7..9889b01
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
README.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.txt b/README.txt
index 5a0ccc7..9889b01
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#55209
·
|
|
Re: Specified SDKMACHINE value is not valid
at one point, I had ppc64le working as SDKMACHINE target as well.
at one point, I had ppc64le working as SDKMACHINE target as well.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#55207
·
|