|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH] qemuzephyrrunner.py: use os._exit instead of sys.exit
sys.exit(0) can cause an error to be reported when the child exits, even
though not an error. Since this is a child process, os._exit(0) is the
proper way to exit and not cause this
sys.exit(0) can cause an error to be reported when the child exits, even
though not an error. Since this is a child process, os._exit(0) is the
proper way to exit and not cause this
|
By
Jon Mason
·
#54852
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] use uuid instead of hard-coding root device
Probably.
You'll need to re-send this with a better subject line and commit
message so the right people will notice it. Otherwise they'll think it's
meta-rockchip-specific.
If (when) this patch gets
Probably.
You'll need to re-send this with a better subject line and commit
message so the right people will notice it. Otherwise they'll think it's
meta-rockchip-specific.
If (when) this patch gets
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#54851
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v2 2/2] rockchip-wic.inc: dont let wic edit fstab by default
Applied to meta-rockchip master (with an updated commit message), thanks!
Applied to meta-rockchip master (with an updated commit message), thanks!
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#54850
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] use uuid instead of hard-coding root device
Am 23.09.21 um 22:55 schrieb Trevor Woerner:
Could the solution be as simple as this?From b8ba56d84fbac53901e5b7ca122498320e51fbf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: MarkusVolk
Am 23.09.21 um 22:55 schrieb Trevor Woerner:
Could the solution be as simple as this?From b8ba56d84fbac53901e5b7ca122498320e51fbf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: MarkusVolk
|
By
Markus Volk
·
#54849
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v2 2/2] rockchip-wic.inc: dont let wic edit fstab by default
Am 24.09.21 um 15:10 schrieb Trevor Woerner:
Thanks for applying :)It would be cool if wic had something like an 'exclude-from-fstab-update" option.That would make the 'fstab-update'
Am 24.09.21 um 15:10 schrieb Trevor Woerner:
Thanks for applying :)It would be cool if wic had something like an 'exclude-from-fstab-update" option.That would make the 'fstab-update'
|
By
Markus Volk
·
#54848
·
|
|
Re: Cross-compiling or compiling on target VM?
there are different possibilities you have with all great tooling you get with yocto project, I think you have made a good choice.
inherently Yocto project is a cross compiling infrastructure so lot
there are different possibilities you have with all great tooling you get with yocto project, I think you have made a good choice.
inherently Yocto project is a cross compiling infrastructure so lot
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54847
·
|
|
[PATCH] yocto-bsp/5.13: drop recipes
From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
5.13 has been removed from core, and we've moved the default
support to 5.14, so we can drop our bbappend.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...>
5.13 has been removed from core, and we've moved the default
support to 5.14, so we can drop our bbappend.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
|
By
Bruce Ashfield
·
#54846
·
|
|
Re: #yocto -third party licensimg
#yocto
Hi Steven,
Please see my comments inline
I am a bit confused, but can try to show you what I typically do.
In my custom meta-my-layer I add to layer.conf:
#-->
LICENSE_PATH += "
Hi Steven,
Please see my comments inline
I am a bit confused, but can try to show you what I typically do.
In my custom meta-my-layer I add to layer.conf:
#-->
LICENSE_PATH += "
|
By
Robert Berger
·
#54845
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH v2 2/2] rockchip-wic.inc: dont let wic edit fstab by default
Thanks for the patch and the SoB line. I'm going to apply this patch, but I'm
going to amend the commit message to capture some of the conversation we've
had. There's a chance we'll want to know "why"
Thanks for the patch and the SoB line. I'm going to apply this patch, but I'm
going to amend the commit message to capture some of the conversation we've
had. There's a chance we'll want to know "why"
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#54844
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] use uuid instead of hard-coding root device
Ah, good catch. I'm using sysvinit.
Ah, good catch. I'm using sysvinit.
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#54843
·
|
|
#yocto -third party licensimg
#yocto
Hello:
I am running zeus 3.0.4…
A vendor has supplied us with a generic license.txt file, which we were able to add to the acexpci recipe we use to build in their package.
The license
Hello:
I am running zeus 3.0.4…
A vendor has supplied us with a generic license.txt file, which we were able to add to the acexpci recipe we use to build in their package.
The license
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#54842
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] use uuid instead of hard-coding root device
Am 24.09.21 um 06:46 schrieb Khem Raj:
I am using systemd
Am 24.09.21 um 06:46 schrieb Khem Raj:
I am using systemd
|
By
Markus Volk
·
#54841
·
|
|
Re: Cross-compiling or compiling on target VM?
Yocto has built-in qemu targets for this purpose, and associated infrastructure to start qemu VMs and run tests in them. But to make it practical, these qemu images need to be started on a baremetal
Yocto has built-in qemu targets for this purpose, and associated infrastructure to start qemu VMs and run tests in them. But to make it practical, these qemu images need to be started on a baremetal
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#54840
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][PATCH] libsepol: Security fix for CVE-2021-36086
CVE-2021-36086:
The CIL compiler in SELinux 3.2 has a use-after-free in cil_reset_classpermission
(called from cil_reset_classperms_set and
CVE-2021-36086:
The CIL compiler in SELinux 3.2 has a use-after-free in cil_reset_classpermission
(called from cil_reset_classperms_set and
|
By
Yi Zhao
·
#54839
·
|
|
Cross-compiling or compiling on target VM?
Hi,
We are starting a new project using Yocto to build a custom Linux image which matches our needs.
We are new to Yocto and still trying to figure out the best way to work with it.
Especially, if it
Hi,
We are starting a new project using Yocto to build a custom Linux image which matches our needs.
We are new to Yocto and still trying to figure out the best way to work with it.
Especially, if it
|
By
arnaud.bienner@...
·
#54838
·
|
|
Re: Using bitbake with external SDK
#sdk
#zeus
#toolchain
Hello Enrico,
an eSDK would be enough to do everything, however I would demand the entire development system if I were to start a project, but that is my opinion.
I don't know well Node-RED but using
Hello Enrico,
an eSDK would be enough to do everything, however I would demand the entire development system if I were to start a project, but that is my opinion.
I don't know well Node-RED but using
|
By
Marco Cavallini
·
#54837
·
|
|
Re: Using bitbake with external SDK
#sdk
#zeus
#toolchain
Hello Marco,
In your opinion isn't enough to ask for eSDK? for instance if i want to add Node-RED, it would be difficult to build with devtool? because i've seen that it doesn't resolve dependencies
Hello Marco,
In your opinion isn't enough to ask for eSDK? for instance if i want to add Node-RED, it would be difficult to build with devtool? because i've seen that it doesn't resolve dependencies
|
By
enrico.buffoli1994@...
·
#54836
·
|
|
Re: Using bitbake with external SDK
#sdk
#zeus
#toolchain
With the eSDK i've to use devtool right?
With the eSDK i've to use devtool right?
|
By
enrico.buffoli1994@...
·
#54835
·
|
|
Re: Using bitbake with external SDK
#sdk
#zeus
#toolchain
Hello Enrico,
usually nowadays every honest hardware manufacturer provides all the sources of the BSP and the development system to their customers.
Try asking your supplier for them.
--
Marco
Hello Enrico,
usually nowadays every honest hardware manufacturer provides all the sources of the BSP and the development system to their customers.
Try asking your supplier for them.
--
Marco
|
By
Marco Cavallini
·
#54834
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/2] zephyr-qemuboot: fix parse build failure
As OE-core explicitly have added depends for qemu-helper addto_recipe_sysroot task, which
breaks zephyr-qemuboot implementation of adding build
As OE-core explicitly have added depends for qemu-helper addto_recipe_sysroot task, which
breaks zephyr-qemuboot implementation of adding build
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#54833
·
|