|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH 1/2] layer: Convert to new override syntax
please use v2
By
Khem Raj
·
#54297
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v2 2/2] layer.conf: Drop compatibility with older than hardknott releases
New override syntax requires it
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
v2: Rebase
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf
New override syntax requires it
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
v2: Rebase
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54296
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH v2 1/2] layer: Convert to new override syntax
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
v2: Fix remaining appends
classes/rockchip-gpt-img.bbclass | 2 +-
conf/machine/include/rockchip-wic.inc | 2 +-
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
v2: Fix remaining appends
classes/rockchip-gpt-img.bbclass | 2 +-
conf/machine/include/rockchip-wic.inc | 2 +-
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54295
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH 1/2] layer: Convert to new override syntax
The following two need changes too, don't they?
There seem to be a few that were missed. I'm working on a patch as well. I'm
just testing the images on some of the targets now.
The following two need changes too, don't they?
There seem to be a few that were missed. I'm working on a patch as well. I'm
just testing the images on some of the targets now.
|
By
Trevor Woerner
·
#54294
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH 1/2] layer: Convert to new override syntax
"_rk3399" also needs to be replaced.
"_rk3399" also needs to be replaced.
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#54293
·
|
|
Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH 2/2] layer.conf: Drop compatibility with older than hardknott releases
I don't use meta-rockchip, but new syntax doesn't require honister, recent revisions of 1.50 bitbake are forward compatible with the new syntax.
I don't use meta-rockchip, but new syntax doesn't require honister, recent revisions of 1.50 bitbake are forward compatible with the new syntax.
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#54292
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH 2/2] layer.conf: Drop compatibility with older than hardknott releases
New override syntax requires it
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf
New override syntax requires it
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54291
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH 1/2] layer: Convert to new override syntax
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
classes/rockchip-gpt-img.bbclass | 2 +-
conf/machine/include/rockchip-wic.inc | 2 +-
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
classes/rockchip-gpt-img.bbclass | 2 +-
conf/machine/include/rockchip-wic.inc | 2 +-
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#54290
·
|
|
Re: [meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/2] Convert to new override syntax
On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 17:07 +0800, Naveen Saini wrote:
…
> diff --git a/conf/machine/qemu-nios2.conf b/conf/machine/qemu-nios2.conf
> index ab8b366..48ed3e4 100644
> ---
On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 17:07 +0800, Naveen Saini wrote:
…
> diff --git a/conf/machine/qemu-nios2.conf b/conf/machine/qemu-nios2.conf
> index ab8b366..48ed3e4 100644
> ---
|
By
Jan Luebbe
·
#54289
·
|
|
Re: Hardknott support level
Hardknott will not become an LTS version, and will be maintained for 7 months, per https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_Release_and_LTS (all of it worth reading).
The current plan is that
Hardknott will not become an LTS version, and will be maintained for 7 months, per https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_Release_and_LTS (all of it worth reading).
The current plan is that
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#54288
·
|
|
Hardknott support level
Hi, I'm starting a new project using Yocto and we plan to use Stable (Hardknott - 3.3).
We gather this information on:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases
How can I verify/follow the when the
Hi, I'm starting a new project using Yocto and we plan to use Stable (Hardknott - 3.3).
We gather this information on:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases
How can I verify/follow the when the
|
By
Fernando Luiz Cola
·
#54287
·
|
|
Re: Auto upgrade helper Verification requirements
#yocto
#gstreamer
#iso
I think it is better if you start with devtool (which is the utility that AUH is using to perform the updates). The workflow is as follows:
$ devtool upgrade recipe-name additional-options
(fix any
I think it is better if you start with devtool (which is the utility that AUH is using to perform the updates). The workflow is as follows:
$ devtool upgrade recipe-name additional-options
(fix any
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#54286
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH 2/2] layer.conf: add honister to LAYERSERIES_COMPAT
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf
index
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#54285
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/2] Convert to new override syntax
Use the convert-overrides.py to convert to new syntax and fixed
some additional changes manually.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
classes/zephyr.bbclass
Use the convert-overrides.py to convert to new syntax and fixed
some additional changes manually.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
classes/zephyr.bbclass
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#54284
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.10.rc1)
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.1.10.rc1 We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2.
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.1.10.rc1 We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2.
|
By
Sangeeta Jain
·
#54283
·
|
|
Auto upgrade helper Verification requirements
#yocto
#gstreamer
#iso
I have gone through documentation of the auto upgrade helper ,like how to use and prerequisites and all.
Can i get any examples like how to use the helper tool to upgrade a recipe,
Also how can i
I have gone through documentation of the auto upgrade helper ,like how to use and prerequisites and all.
Can i get any examples like how to use the helper tool to upgrade a recipe,
Also how can i
|
By
ksmanjunath681@...
·
#54282
·
|
|
Re: Recipe dependent on Debian package - How should I approach?
#debian
#yocto
So, that is something I already have. What I really need are the systemd header files in order to build my recipe. Looks like the log output didn't format well. Let me re-post that below with some
So, that is something I already have. What I really need are the systemd header files in order to build my recipe. Looks like the log output didn't format well. Let me re-post that below with some
|
By
Mitch Gaines <gainesmitch2@...>
·
#54281
·
|
|
How to get git tag + SHA as part of package name
#yocto
Hello,
I would like to have the git tag + SHA as part of the package name . I created an anonymous function which uses git ls-remote command however this anonymous function is called multiple times
Hello,
I would like to have the git tag + SHA as part of the package name . I created an anonymous function which uses git ls-remote command however this anonymous function is called multiple times
|
By
msg board
·
#54280
·
|
|
[meta-mingw][master][PATCH] Convert to new override syntax This is the result of automated script (0.9.0) conversion:
oe-core/scripts/contrib/convert-overrides.py .
converting the metadata to use : as the override character instead of
Signed-off-by: Sai Hari Chandana Kalluri <chandana.kalluri@...>
---
oe-core/scripts/contrib/convert-overrides.py .
converting the metadata to use : as the override character instead of
Signed-off-by: Sai Hari Chandana Kalluri <chandana.kalluri@...>
---
|
By
Chandana kalluri
·
#54279
·
|
|
Re: (Go) Library for configuring Yocto based boxes?
Hi all,
so I guess this is another case of "I should have posed my question earlier, than I would have found the soltion myself" ;-)
So it turns out that:
err =
Hi all,
so I guess this is another case of "I should have posed my question earlier, than I would have found the soltion myself" ;-)
So it turns out that:
err =
|
By
Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@...>
·
#54278
·
|