yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org

[meta-security][PATCH] Do not use clang toolchain in Parsec recipes

Signed-off-by: Anton Antonov <Anton.Antonov@...> --- .../recipes-parsec/parsec-service/parsec-service_0.7.0.bb | 3 +-- meta-parsec/recipes-parsec/parsec-tool/parsec-tool_0.3.0.bb | 2 --

By Anton Antonov · #54125 ·

Re: Sysvinit recipe with custom package group Build ERROR #dunfell

here is the package group custom recipe: DESCRIPTION = "My Custom Package groups" inherit packagegroup PROVIDES = "${PACKAGES}" PACKAGES = " \ ${PN}-apps \ ${PN}-tools \

By Abdelrahman El-Gammal <a.elgammal2019@...> · #54124 ·

Sysvinit recipe with custom package group Build ERROR #dunfell

Hello there, I am building a sysvinit recipe for a startup app. And add into the image using custom package groups. Both the package group and recipe when built on their own, the build succeeds. But,

By Abdelrahman El-Gammal <a.elgammal2019@...> · #54123 ·

[meta-rockchip][PATCH] rock-pi-e: update preferred kernel

The latest updates to linux-yocto-dev now include support for the rock-pi-e so do away with our custom recipe and use the one from oe-core. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> ---

By Trevor Woerner · #54122 ·

[meta-rockchip][PATCH] remove LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION

Adding "-rockchip" to the Linux kernel name implies, to me anyway, that this is a vendor kernel. The PREFERRED_PROVIDERs of all kernels specified in this BSP are upstream linux-yocto kernels, not

By Trevor Woerner · #54121 ·

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for July 13, 2021

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for July 13, 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == disclaimer == Best efforts are made

By Trevor Woerner · #54120 ·

Re: Per recipes simple smoke tests

Hi Samuel Please look at insane.bbclass and perhaps a new check can be added there ?

By Khem Raj · #54119 ·

Re: [meta-spdxscanner] Question about meta-spdxscanner

.snip. Hi Lei, I tried the latest meta-spdxscanner with a Docker version cof Fossology but the entire process fails with errors on the Yocto bitbake side. I'd like to have a minimal proof of work of

By Marco Cavallini · #54118 ·

Yocto Project Status WW28`21

Current Dev Position: YP 3.4 M2 Next Deadline: 12th July 2021 YP 3.4 M2 build Next Team Meetings: Bug Triage meeting Thursday July 15th at 7:30am PDT

By Stephen Jolley · #54117 ·

M+ & H bugs with Milestone Movements WW27

All, YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW28 are listed below: Priority Bug ID Short Description Changer Owner Was Became Medium+ 11906 rpmbuild: Can not build packages on

By Stephen Jolley · #54116 ·

Enhancements/Bugs closed WW28!

All, The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week! Who Count richard.purdie@... 3 akuster808@... 2 ross@... 2 thomas.perrot@... 1 mshah@... 1 Grand

By Stephen Jolley · #54115 ·

Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 3.4

All, Below is the list as of top 50 bug owners as of the end of WW28 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.4. There are 77 possible work days left until the final

By Stephen Jolley · #54114 ·

Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed

All, The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on

By Stephen Jolley · #54113 ·

[yocto-autobuilder-helper] [PATCH] config.json: Use pregen-hostkeys on all qemu targets

Rather than just ppc/mips, use the pregen-hostkeys on all the qemu targets since this is using a lot of time on the autobuilders when we don't really need to. This should avoid some of the testing

By Richard Purdie · #54112 ·

Re: [meta-spdxscanner] Question about meta-spdxscanner

Hi Lei, thank you for answering. Considering the problems I encounter with scancode-tk and that the artifacts it produces are simple text files that need further analysis, I was just deciding to

By Marco Cavallini · #54111 ·

Re: [meta-spdxscanner] Question about meta-spdxscanner

Hi Marco Yes, you can contact me or contribute to meta-spdxscanner to this ML. I have not maintained scancode-tk for long time. And recently there are somebody else asked me about scancode-tk. Yes,

By leimaohui · #54110 ·

Per recipes simple smoke tests

Hi everyone, I was asked to add some basic tests to an internal recipe in order to improve our CI system. The purpose would be to produce an error if some check doesn't pass like - a file is not

By Samuel Dolt · #54109 ·

Re: #yocto Preferred development workflow #yocto

We have many recipes appended to IMAGE_INSTALL in our image recipes and it works just fine. From your description, it sounds like you could go either way. I personally prefer to keep my image recipes

By Chuck Wolber · #54108 ·

Re: #yocto Preferred development workflow #yocto

sorry about that, right now the config files are placed in the files directory of the recipe which builds the module. Sample snippets of the recipe concerning this config file, I removed the rest of

By ivin.lim@... · #54107 ·

Re: #yocto Preferred development workflow #yocto

You left a few details out about how the configuration files are managed. Ideally you could just make bitbake recipes for the config files themselves. This way you can create an image recipe for each

By Chuck Wolber · #54106 ·

Messages