yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for June 29 2021

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for June 29 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == disclaimer == Best efforts are made

By Trevor Woerner · #54009 ·

Yocto Project Status WW26`21

Current Dev Position: YP 3.4 M2 Next Deadline: 12th July 2021 YP 3.4 M2 build Next Team Meetings: Bug Triage meeting Thursday July 1st at 7:30am PDT

By Stephen Jolley · #54008 ·

pyqtwebengine recipe problem

Hi All, I want to make a recipe for python3-pyqt5 and python3-pyqtwebengine, the problem is that the source doe does not contain setup.py , it contains project.py and configure.py. Is there a

By Bel Hadj Salem Talel <bhstalel@...> · #54007 ·

Re: Would COMPATIBLE_IMAGE make sense?

<jester@...> wrote: I was also going to suggest distros. And also, if the concern really is about builds reusing downloads, etc, then by all means configure those different distro

By Bruce Ashfield · #54006 ·

Re: Would COMPATIBLE_IMAGE make sense?

<jester@...> wrote: I agree with everything Josef said, but just wanted to add that if it's just different configurations needed for different images it might be easier to just put the

By Erik Boto · #54005 ·

Re: Yocto build isnot Booting up on board zc702 #gatesgarth #linux #yocto

Hello, What is your output from the ZC702 (USB) serial console? I had similar issue on ZCU102 and debugged my issue: "the U-Boot not showing anything I have debugged to be an issue

By Leon Woestenberg · #54004 ·

Re: Would COMPATIBLE_IMAGE make sense?

Howdy! Am 29.06.2021 um 01:28 schrieb Jonas Vautherin: Yocto chant #1 applies: "Recipe data is local, configuration data is global." Means: the recipe does not see at all which image it is being

By Josef Holzmayr · #54003 ·

Yocto build isnot Booting up on board zc702 #gatesgarth #linux #yocto

i have tried to build yocto image. And it compiled successfully without any error but when am trying to BOOT them it didnt prompt any error message my BBlayer.conf is shown below #

By shoaib akhtar · #54002 ·

Re: Would COMPATIBLE_IMAGE make sense?

Hello, instead of creating a new variable (don't sure of its possible usefulness), you can use BBMASK or review dependencies between your layer PS: I did a similar answer on your stackoverflow

By Frederic Martinsons <frederic.martinsons@...> · #54001 ·

M+ & H bugs with Milestone Movements WW26

All, YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW26 are listed below: Priority Bug ID Short Description Changer Owner Was Became Medium+ 6428 Improve the ability to isolate

By Stephen Jolley · #54000 ·

Enhancements/Bugs closed WW26!

All, The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week! Who Count richard.purdie@... 3 bruce.ashfield@... 1 Grand Total 4 Thanks, Stephen K. Jolley Yocto

By Stephen Jolley · #53999 ·

Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 3.4

All, Below is the list as of top 50 bug owners as of the end of WW26 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.4. There are 86 possible work days left until the final

By Stephen Jolley · #53998 ·

Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed

All, The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on

By Stephen Jolley · #53997 ·

Would COMPATIBLE_IMAGE make sense?

I was thinking about my issue described here [1], and discovered the variables called COMPATIBLE_MACHINE and COMPATIBLE_HOST, which "you can use to stop recipes from being built for

By Jonas Vautherin · #53996 ·

[meta-rockchip][PATCH 3/3] wic/wks cleanup

By exporting a couple more variables the wks file for every rockchip device can be built from one template instead of having separate wks files for each board and platform. The following BSP

By Trevor Woerner · #53995 ·

[meta-rockchip][PATCH 2/3] IMAGE_FSTYPES: remove ext4

The ext4 IMAGE_FSTYPES does not need to be mentioned explicitly. It will be automatically generated in cases where it is needed. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> ---

By Trevor Woerner · #53994 ·

[meta-rockchip][PATCH 1/3] conf/machine/include/nanopi-m4.inc: add full include path

Specify the full include path to the rk3399.inc file. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> --- conf/machine/include/nanopi-m4.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

By Trevor Woerner · #53993 ·

Re: [meta-rockchip][PATCH] conf/machine/include/rockchip-wic.inc: create

Applied to meta-rockchip master.

By Trevor Woerner · #53992 ·

Re: [OE-core] Hardknott (GCC10) Compiler Issues

Even better, the rootfs built by YOCTO could be used, but anyone can build U-Boot and kernel outside of the YOCTO, using their own cross compilers (I use Fedora 33 ARM cross compilers, since my Linux

By Zoran · #53991 ·

Re: [OE-core] Hardknott (GCC10) Compiler Issues

At least seems that GCC 10.2 is not the cause of the problem for my cannelloni recipe issue: https://github.com/mguentner/cannelloni/issues/35 The same error repeats itself with GCC 11.2 (in

By Zoran · #53990 ·

Messages