|
Re: How to switch yocto INIT_MANAGER from systemd to sysvinit
#dunfell
Is it INIT_MANAGER = " sysvinit" , or INIT_MANAGER = "sysvinit" (no
blank at the beginning)?
Thank you,
Zee
_______
<sayinswapna@...> wrote:
Is it INIT_MANAGER = " sysvinit" , or INIT_MANAGER = "sysvinit" (no
blank at the beginning)?
Thank you,
Zee
_______
<sayinswapna@...> wrote:
|
By
Zoran
·
#53691
·
|
|
Re: How to switch yocto INIT_MANAGER from systemd to sysvinit
#dunfell
Thanks Robert and Raj!!
I am using Yocto 3.1 Dunfell release.
You are right about the .bbappend file. Changed the name in the overlay to new-ver.bbappend and no longer see the warning.
Tried setting
Thanks Robert and Raj!!
I am using Yocto 3.1 Dunfell release.
You are right about the .bbappend file. Changed the name in the overlay to new-ver.bbappend and no longer see the warning.
Tried setting
|
By
Swapna Nannapaneni
·
#53690
·
|
|
Re: How to switch yocto INIT_MANAGER from systemd to sysvinit
#dunfell
Why do I (always) point out the obvious?
And I do need... Geniuses are not meant to fix The World to understand them!?
Geniuses should understand The World (and act properly)!
Extras to geniality,
Why do I (always) point out the obvious?
And I do need... Geniuses are not meant to fix The World to understand them!?
Geniuses should understand The World (and act properly)!
Extras to geniality,
|
By
Zoran
·
#53689
·
|
|
Re: Where to define username/password when fetching sstate via http with basic authentication?
Hi Quentin,
obviously I didn't read that page carefully enough. Sorry for the noise and thanks for the hint.
Cheers, Manuel
Am Fr, 28. Mai 2021, um 11:35, schrieb Quentin Schulz:
Hi Quentin,
obviously I didn't read that page carefully enough. Sorry for the noise and thanks for the hint.
Cheers, Manuel
Am Fr, 28. Mai 2021, um 11:35, schrieb Quentin Schulz:
|
By
Manuel Wagesreither
·
#53688
·
|
|
Re: Where to define username/password when fetching sstate via http with basic authentication?
Hi Manuel,
There is an example in the commit you sent, so I would say:
SSTATE_MIRRORS ?= " \
file://.* http://someserver.tld/share/sstate/PATH;user=username:password;downloadfilename=PATH
Hi Manuel,
There is an example in the commit you sent, so I would say:
SSTATE_MIRRORS ?= " \
file://.* http://someserver.tld/share/sstate/PATH;user=username:password;downloadfilename=PATH
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#53687
·
|
|
Where to define username/password when fetching sstate via http with basic authentication?
Hello all,
to speed up builds, we would like to make the CI generated sstate-cache available via internet. Due to IP concerns, we don't want to make it publically available but for authenticated
Hello all,
to speed up builds, we would like to make the CI generated sstate-cache available via internet. Due to IP concerns, we don't want to make it publically available but for authenticated
|
By
Manuel Wagesreither
·
#53686
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][hardknott][PATCH 4/4] acrn.conf: drop acrn machine configuration
zephyr can be build for 'acrn' with following configuration:
MACHINE = "intel-x86-64"
ZEPHYR_BOARD = "acrn"
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
conf/machine/acrn.conf | 9
zephyr can be build for 'acrn' with following configuration:
MACHINE = "intel-x86-64"
ZEPHYR_BOARD = "acrn"
Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <naveen.kumar.saini@...>
---
conf/machine/acrn.conf | 9
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#53685
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][hardknott][PATCH 3/4] intel-x86-32.conf: add common MACHINE for x86 (32-bit) BOARDS
User need to specify board value to ZEPHYR_BOARD in local.conf
ZEPHYR_BOARD = "minnowboard"
By default it set to MinnowBoard Max 'minnowboard'
Currently 32-bit supported boards:
* up_squared_32
*
User need to specify board value to ZEPHYR_BOARD in local.conf
ZEPHYR_BOARD = "minnowboard"
By default it set to MinnowBoard Max 'minnowboard'
Currently 32-bit supported boards:
* up_squared_32
*
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#53684
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][hardknott][PATCH 1/4] zephyr-kernel-src: fix efi generation failure for x86 boards
With zephyr v2.5.0, EFI binary support has been added for x86 board (64-bit mode).
To achieve this, an python tool[1] has been added to convert zephyr ELF file
into an EFI appliable. But currently
With zephyr v2.5.0, EFI binary support has been added for x86 board (64-bit mode).
To achieve this, an python tool[1] has been added to convert zephyr ELF file
into an EFI appliable. But currently
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#53683
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][hardknott][PATCH 2/4] intel-x86-64.conf: add common MACHINE for x86 (64-bit) BOARDS
User need to specify board value to ZEPHYR_BOARD in local.conf
ZEPHYR_BOARD = "ehl_crb"
By default it set to Elkhart Lake CRB 'ehl_crb'
Currently 64-bit supported boards:
* up_squared
*
User need to specify board value to ZEPHYR_BOARD in local.conf
ZEPHYR_BOARD = "ehl_crb"
By default it set to Elkhart Lake CRB 'ehl_crb'
Currently 64-bit supported boards:
* up_squared
*
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#53682
·
|
|
Re: [meta-zephyr][PATCH 1/5] zephyr-kernel: Clone mbedtls
V2.6.0-rc1 patch is not merged as it is pre-release. Lets wait for stable release.
Could you please rebase these patches for v2.5.0 latest master ?
Regards,
Naveen
V2.6.0-rc1 patch is not merged as it is pre-release. Lets wait for stable release.
Could you please rebase these patches for v2.5.0 latest master ?
Regards,
Naveen
|
By
Naveen Saini
·
#53681
·
|
|
hardknott: open-embedded: kernel-fitimage.bblass, fiitmage_emit_section_boot_script bad
Been trying added a uboot script to my fitImage ( in hardknott)
Looks like the routine fiitmage_emit_section_boot_scrip Has not updated it syntax for node name or hash node
Still using’@’
Been trying added a uboot script to my fitImage ( in hardknott)
Looks like the routine fiitmage_emit_section_boot_scrip Has not updated it syntax for node name or hash node
Still using’@’
|
By
richard allen
·
#53680
·
|
|
Re: How to switch yocto INIT_MANAGER from systemd to sysvinit
#dunfell
Please find out which layer is adding this bbappend you could use
bitbake-layers show-appends sysvinit
It seems recipe version is newer perhaps and the bbappend is still made for older recipe, these
Please find out which layer is adding this bbappend you could use
bitbake-layers show-appends sysvinit
It seems recipe version is newer perhaps and the bbappend is still made for older recipe, these
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53679
·
|
|
Re: How to switch yocto INIT_MANAGER from systemd to sysvinit
#dunfell
it will depend on release, if you are on 3.0+ then yes single setting will work, older releases would mean above is needed.
it will depend on release, if you are on 3.0+ then yes single setting will work, older releases would mean above is needed.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53678
·
|
|
Re: How to switch yocto INIT_MANAGER from systemd to sysvinit
#dunfell
as i recall, all of the above can be replaced by a single assignment
to the INIT_MANAGER variable.
rday
as i recall, all of the above can be replaced by a single assignment
to the INIT_MANAGER variable.
rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#53677
·
|
|
How to switch yocto INIT_MANAGER from systemd to sysvinit
#dunfell
Hello Yocto team:
I just started with yocto and would like to know the process for switching the init manager from systemd to sysvinit.
I tried this options in config file
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager
Hello Yocto team:
I just started with yocto and would like to know the process for switching the init manager from systemd to sysvinit.
I tried this options in config file
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager
|
By
Swapna Nannapaneni
·
#53676
·
|
|
[announcement] jumpnow/meta-bbb and jumpnow/meta-jumpnow
Hello Folks,
In order to continue to develop my:
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto
And advance to yocto hardknott, I did the temporary moves:
Cloned both jumpnow repos to my github
Hello Folks,
In order to continue to develop my:
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto
And advance to yocto hardknott, I did the temporary moves:
Cloned both jumpnow repos to my github
|
By
Zoran
·
#53675
·
|
|
Re: a recipe that launches a docker container to build a custom library...
maybe take a look at some of the work toradex has done,
maybe in their torizon tree you can find some creative ways
maybe take a look at some of the work toradex has done,
maybe in their torizon tree you can find some creative ways
|
By
Yocto
·
#53674
·
|
|
Error while updating sources using "$ opkg update". [ opkg_verify_gpg_signature: GPG signature checking not supported ] [ pkg_src_verify: Signature verification failed for *. ]
#yocto
#raspberrypi
Hi everyone.
I am trying to setup a Package Feed with signed ipk packages. For this, I first set up the key pair on my build host.
This is the result of "$ gpg --list-keys" :
Hi everyone.
I am trying to setup a Package Feed with signed ipk packages. For this, I first set up the key pair on my build host.
This is the result of "$ gpg --list-keys" :
|
By
tokuchiprime@...
·
#53673
·
|
|
a recipe that launches a docker container to build a custom library...
Has anyone seen suck an animal before, and if not, how hard would it be to launch a container, then get the output to install like a normal recipe does?
Has anyone seen suck an animal before, and if not, how hard would it be to launch a container, then get the output to install like a normal recipe does?
|
By
flobro30101@...
·
#53672
·
|