|
Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 3.4
All,
Below is the list as of top 50 bug owners as of the end of WW18 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.4. There are 125 possible work days left until the final
All,
Below is the list as of top 50 bug owners as of the end of WW18 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.4. There are 125 possible work days left until the final
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#53351
·
|
|
Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#53350
·
|
|
Reminder: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting @ Monthly from 8am on the first Tuesday (PDT)
All,
Just a reminder we will hold the monthly Yocto Project Technical Meeting at 8am PST tomorrow. (5/4)
Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting: We encourage people attending the meeting to
All,
Just a reminder we will hold the monthly Yocto Project Technical Meeting at 8am PST tomorrow. (5/4)
Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting: We encourage people attending the meeting to
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#53349
·
|
|
Re: Criteria for bitbake to skip recipes
#bitbake
I'm not aware of a specific list but two that come to mind are,
(in meta-openembedded):
$ rgrep PNBLACKLIST meta-*| wc -l
10
$ rgrep COMPATIBLE_HOST meta-*| wc -l
115
Maybe you can explain why you
I'm not aware of a specific list but two that come to mind are,
(in meta-openembedded):
$ rgrep PNBLACKLIST meta-*| wc -l
10
$ rgrep COMPATIBLE_HOST meta-*| wc -l
115
Maybe you can explain why you
|
By
Randy MacLeod
·
#53348
·
|
|
SSH_AUTH_SOCK unavailable when pulling modules
#golang
Hi,
I have put together a recipe inheriting from go-mod. This project depends on out-of-repo modules that sit in private repos. As long as the SSH key required to pull the requirements is present as
Hi,
I have put together a recipe inheriting from go-mod. This project depends on out-of-repo modules that sit in private repos. As long as the SSH key required to pull the requirements is present as
|
By
Sven
·
#53347
·
|
|
Re: [meta-gplv2][PATCH] elfutils: ignore format-truncation and stringop-overflow issues to fix build with gcc-11
looks ok. Thanks for fixing it
looks ok. Thanks for fixing it
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53346
·
|
|
[meta-gplv2][PATCH] elfutils: ignore format-truncation and stringop-overflow issues to fix build with gcc-11
* works around:
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/580076/
elfutils-0.148/src/ar.c:1088:56: error: '%-*ld' directive output may be truncated writing between 6 and 10 bytes into a region
* works around:
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/580076/
elfutils-0.148/src/ar.c:1088:56: error: '%-*ld' directive output may be truncated writing between 6 and 10 bytes into a region
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#53345
·
|
|
[meta-selinux] MAINTAINERS: Remove myself.
I have been inactive for an extended period.
Signed-off-by: Philip Tricca <flihp@...>
---
MAINTAINERS | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index
I have been inactive for an extended period.
Signed-off-by: Philip Tricca <flihp@...>
---
MAINTAINERS | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index
|
By
flihp@...
·
#53344
·
|
|
Observed issue regarding hostapd
Hi
can you please help out with following issue
ERROR: core-image-minimal-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Postinstall scriptlets of ['hostapd'] have failed. If the intention is to defer them to first boot,then
Hi
can you please help out with following issue
ERROR: core-image-minimal-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Postinstall scriptlets of ['hostapd'] have failed. If the intention is to defer them to first boot,then
|
By
rohit jadhav
·
#53343
·
|
|
#yocto cmake configurations
#yocto
I am using zeus, standard SDK, cmake…
Can I pre-configure the SDK to setup cmake package search paths ?, say for find_package, etc. (i.e. detecting external libraries/programs)…
The
I am using zeus, standard SDK, cmake…
Can I pre-configure the SDK to setup cmake package search paths ?, say for find_package, etc. (i.e. detecting external libraries/programs)…
The
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#53342
·
|
|
[meta-raspberrypi] Booting a Raspberry Pi 4 using PXE
Hello all!
Since a certain eeprom version, the Raspberry Pi 4 can directly boot from network. Has anyone experience on this?
I already managed to to have the Raspi to load the kernel and all the
Hello all!
Since a certain eeprom version, the Raspberry Pi 4 can directly boot from network. Has anyone experience on this?
I already managed to to have the Raspi to load the kernel and all the
|
By
Manuel Wagesreither
·
#53341
·
|
|
[meta-mingw] [PATCH 2/2] nativesdk-mingw-w64-winpthreads: Implement __udivmoddi4
Fixes build with gcc 11+
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
.../0001-winpthreads-Add-__udivmoddi4.patch | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
.../nativesdk-mingw-w64-winpthreads_8.0.0.bb | 2
Fixes build with gcc 11+
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
.../0001-winpthreads-Add-__udivmoddi4.patch | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
.../nativesdk-mingw-w64-winpthreads_8.0.0.bb | 2
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53340
·
|
|
[meta-mingw] [PATCH 1/2] mingw-w64-runtime,mingw-w64-winpthreads: Upgrade to 8.0.0
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
recipes-devtools/mingw-w64/mingw-w64.inc | 2 +-
...64-headers_7.0.0.bb => nativesdk-mingw-w64-headers_8.0.0.bb} | 0
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...>
---
recipes-devtools/mingw-w64/mingw-w64.inc | 2 +-
...64-headers_7.0.0.bb => nativesdk-mingw-w64-headers_8.0.0.bb} | 0
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53339
·
|
|
devtool modify fails
To my way of thinking, a
$ devtool modify linux
should NEVER fail if it is preceded by
$ bitbake -c do_cleanall linux
The intended staging of the kernel into the workspace fails, saying
that it
To my way of thinking, a
$ devtool modify linux
should NEVER fail if it is preceded by
$ bitbake -c do_cleanall linux
The intended staging of the kernel into the workspace fails, saying
that it
|
By
Kent Dorfman <kent.dorfman766@...>
·
#53338
·
|
|
Re: any compelling reason to use SDK rather than eSDK?
Hi,
It's very big and probably include your proprietary SW header and
libraries at the very least... or third party prebuilt
binaries/libraries you're not supposed to share outside of your
Hi,
It's very big and probably include your proprietary SW header and
libraries at the very least... or third party prebuilt
binaries/libraries you're not supposed to share outside of your
|
By
Quentin Schulz
·
#53337
·
|
|
[meta-gplv2][PATCH] gnutls: add possibility to build with cryptodev support
Add possibility, via PACKAGECONFIG variable, to enable cryptodev
(hardware crypto acceleration) for gnutls in a very similar way
as it is already present for openssl.
Signed-off-by: Federico
Add possibility, via PACKAGECONFIG variable, to enable cryptodev
(hardware crypto acceleration) for gnutls in a very similar way
as it is already present for openssl.
Signed-off-by: Federico
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
·
#53336
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH yocto-autobuilder2 1/2] meta-arm has a hardknott branch now
The plan is that today-ish we roll the 3.3 release for hardknott and
also tag point releases on the stable branches too.
Ross
The plan is that today-ish we roll the 3.3 release for hardknott and
also tag point releases on the stable branches too.
Ross
|
By
Ross Burton <ross@...>
·
#53335
·
|
|
any compelling reason to use SDK rather than eSDK?
colleague wants to get into working with SDKs, and as i'm just
diving into the intricacies of that myself, i'm not sure how to
answser the question: "is there any reason to use the regular SDK
colleague wants to get into working with SDKs, and as i'm just
diving into the intricacies of that myself, i'm not sure how to
answser the question: "is there any reason to use the regular SDK
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
·
#53334
·
|
|
Re: Can layer maintainers add yocto-X.Y tags for yocto-3.3 and later?
I think its perhaps also that distros have mechanisms to lock layers at a given
revision whatever tooling they use ( git submod, android repo,
combotools something else)
so distro manifest at that
I think its perhaps also that distros have mechanisms to lock layers at a given
revision whatever tooling they use ( git submod, android repo,
combotools something else)
so distro manifest at that
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#53333
·
|
|
Re: Can layer maintainers add yocto-X.Y tags for yocto-3.3 and later?
To be honest I don't see much value of these tags for layers not
included in the QA testing with oe-core release.
I believe we agreed on promoting latest revisions in the branches for
selected
To be honest I don't see much value of these tags for layers not
included in the QA testing with oe-core release.
I believe we agreed on promoting latest revisions in the branches for
selected
|
By
Martin Jansa
·
#53332
·
|